• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在初始 SSRI 治疗无效后改用第二种抗抑郁药时的预期:来自随机临床试验 STAR*D 的报告。

What to Expect When Switching to a Second Antidepressant Medication Following an Ineffective Initial SSRI: A Report From the Randomized Clinical STAR*D Study.

机构信息

Duke-National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Odessa, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 11;81(5):19m12949. doi: 10.4088/JCP.19m12949.

DOI:10.4088/JCP.19m12949
PMID:32780949
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

An antidepressant medication switch often follows a failed initial trial with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). When, for whom, and how often second-step response and remission occur are unclear, as is preferred second-step trial duration. As more treatments are approved for use following 2 failed "adequate" trials, researchers and clinicians require an evidence-based definition of "adequate."

METHODS

Following citalopram in the randomized Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) clinical trial (which ran July 2001-September 2006), participants with score ≥ 11 on the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Rated (QIDS-SR₁₆) were randomized to bupropion sustained release, sertraline, or venlafaxine extended release (up to 14 weeks). The QIDS-SR₁₆ defined response, remission, and no clinically meaningful benefit based on the modified intent-to-treat sample.

RESULTS

About 80% of 438 participants completed ≥ 6 weeks of treatment with the switch medication. All treatments had comparable outcomes. Overall, 21% (91/438) remitted, 9% (40/438) responded without remission, and 58% (255/438) had no meaningful benefit. Half of the responses and two-thirds of remissions occurred after 6 weeks of treatment. Overall, 33% of responses (43/131) occurred after ≥ 9 weeks of treatment. No baseline features differentiated early from later responders or remitters. No early triage point was found, but those with at least 20% reduction from baseline in QIDS-SR₁₆ score around week 2 were 6 times more likely to respond or remit than those without this reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Following nonefficacy with an initial SSRI, only about 20% remit and more than half achieve no meaningful benefit with a second-step switch to another monoaminergic antidepressant. A 12-week trial duration seems necessary to capture as many second-step switch responders as possible.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00021528.

摘要

目的

在选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)初始治疗失败后,通常会进行抗抑郁药物转换。目前尚不清楚第二步反应和缓解发生的时间、人群以及频率,也不清楚第二步试验的最佳持续时间。随着越来越多的治疗方法在两次“充分”试验失败后被批准使用,研究人员和临床医生需要一个基于证据的“充分”定义。

方法

在随机序贯治疗选择缓解抑郁(STAR*D)临床试验(2001 年 7 月至 2006 年 9 月进行)中,西酞普兰治疗后,16 项快速抑郁症状自评量表-自我报告(QIDS-SR₁₆)评分≥11 的参与者被随机分配至安非他酮缓释片、舍曲林或文拉法辛缓释片(最长 14 周)。根据修改后的意向治疗样本,QIDS-SR₁₆ 定义了反应、缓解和无临床意义获益。

结果

约 438 名参与者中的 80%完成了切换药物的治疗≥6 周。所有治疗的结果都相当。总体而言,21%(91/438)缓解,9%(40/438)有反应但未缓解,58%(255/438)无明显获益。约一半的反应和三分之二的缓解发生在治疗 6 周后。总体而言,33%的反应(43/131)发生在治疗≥9 周后。没有基线特征可以区分早期和晚期反应者或缓解者。没有发现早期分诊点,但那些在 QIDS-SR₁₆ 评分第 2 周左右基线降低至少 20%的患者,比没有这种降低的患者有 6 倍的可能性出现反应或缓解。

结论

在初始 SSRIs 治疗无效后,只有约 20%的患者缓解,超过一半的患者在进行第二步切换至另一种单胺类抗抑郁药后无明显获益。12 周的试验持续时间似乎是尽可能多地捕获第二步切换反应者所必需的。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT00021528。

相似文献

1
What to Expect When Switching to a Second Antidepressant Medication Following an Ineffective Initial SSRI: A Report From the Randomized Clinical STAR*D Study.在初始 SSRI 治疗无效后改用第二种抗抑郁药时的预期:来自随机临床试验 STAR*D 的报告。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 11;81(5):19m12949. doi: 10.4088/JCP.19m12949.
2
Bupropion-SR, sertraline, or venlafaxine-XR after failure of SSRIs for depression.对于抑郁症患者,在选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)治疗失败后使用安非他酮缓释片、舍曲林或文拉法辛缓释片。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 23;354(12):1231-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052963.
3
The impact of chronic depression on acute and long-term outcomes in a randomized trial comparing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor monotherapy versus each of 2 different antidepressant medication combinations.在一项比较选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂单药治疗与两种不同抗抑郁药物联合治疗的随机试验中,慢性抑郁症对急性和长期结局的影响。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;73(7):967-76. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07043. Epub 2012 May 29.
4
Selecting among second-step antidepressant medication monotherapies: predictive value of clinical, demographic, or first-step treatment features.在第二步抗抑郁药物单一疗法中进行选择:临床、人口统计学或第一步治疗特征的预测价值。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Aug;65(8):870-80. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.8.870.
5
Medication augmentation after the failure of SSRIs for depression.5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗抑郁症失败后的药物增效治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 23;354(12):1243-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052964.
6
Difference in treatment outcome in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression: a STAR*D report.伴有焦虑的门诊抑郁症患者与无焦虑抑郁症患者治疗结果的差异:一项STAR*D报告
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;165(3):342-51. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06111868. Epub 2008 Jan 2.
7
Cognitive therapy versus medication in augmentation and switch strategies as second-step treatments: a STAR*D report.作为第二步治疗的增效和换药策略中认知疗法与药物治疗的比较:STAR*D报告
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 May;164(5):739-52. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.5.739.
8
Frontoparietal Activation During Response Inhibition Predicts Remission to Antidepressants in Patients With Major Depression.前额顶叶激活在反应抑制期间预测了重度抑郁症患者对抗抑郁药的缓解。
Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 15;79(4):274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.02.037. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
9
Baseline depression severity as a predictor of single and combination antidepressant treatment outcome: results from the CO-MED trial.基线抑郁严重程度作为单药和联合抗抑郁治疗结局的预测因素:CO-MED 试验结果。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012 Mar;22(3):183-99. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.07.010. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
10
Increase in work productivity of depressed individuals with improvement in depressive symptom severity.抑郁症状严重程度改善可提高抑郁个体的工作生产力。
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;170(6):633-41. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12020250.

引用本文的文献

1
Antidepressant Switching as a Proxy Phenotype for Drug Nonresponse: Investigating Clinical, Demographic, and Genetic Characteristics.作为药物无反应替代表型的抗抑郁药换药:临床、人口统计学和遗传特征研究
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2025 Apr 10;5(4):100502. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100502. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Cross-species dissection of the modular role of the ventral tegmental area in depressive disorders.腹侧被盖区在抑郁症中模块化作用的跨物种剖析
Neuroscience. 2025 Mar 17;569:248-266. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.02.008. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
3
Neural and behavioral markers of inhibitory control predict symptom improvement during internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for depression.
神经和行为抑制控制标志物可预测互联网认知行为疗法治疗抑郁症过程中的症状改善。
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 23;14(1):303. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03020-9.
4
Challenges of research on treatment-resistant depression: a clinician's perspective.难治性抑郁症的研究挑战:临床医生视角
World Psychiatry. 2023 Oct;22(3):415-417. doi: 10.1002/wps.21136.
5
Buprenorphine as a Treatment for Major Depression and Opioid Use Disorder.丁丙诺啡作为重度抑郁症和阿片类物质使用障碍的一种治疗方法。
Adv Drug Alcohol Res. 2022;2. doi: 10.3389/adar.2022.10254. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
6
Cortical Thickness Predicts Response Following 2 Weeks of SSRI Regimen in First-Episode, Drug-Naive Major Depressive Disorder: An MRI Study.皮质厚度可预测首发、未服用过药物的重度抑郁症患者在接受2周选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)治疗方案后的反应:一项磁共振成像(MRI)研究
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 22;12:751756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.751756. eCollection 2021.
7
Does Psychedelic Therapy Have a Transdiagnostic Action and Prophylactic Potential?迷幻疗法是否具有跨诊断作用和预防潜力?
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 19;12:661233. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.661233. eCollection 2021.
8
Pharmacotherapy, drug-drug interactions and potentially inappropriate medication in depressive disorders.药物治疗、药物相互作用和抑郁障碍中的潜在不适当药物治疗。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0255192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255192. eCollection 2021.