• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于抑郁症患者,在选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)治疗失败后使用安非他酮缓释片、舍曲林或文拉法辛缓释片。

Bupropion-SR, sertraline, or venlafaxine-XR after failure of SSRIs for depression.

作者信息

Rush A John, Trivedi Madhukar H, Wisniewski Stephen R, Stewart Jonathan W, Nierenberg Andrew A, Thase Michael E, Ritz Louise, Biggs Melanie M, Warden Diane, Luther James F, Shores-Wilson Kathy, Niederehe George, Fava Maurizio

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9086, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 23;354(12):1231-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052963.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa052963
PMID:16554525
Abstract

BACKGROUND

After unsuccessful treatment for depression with a selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), it is not known whether switching to one antidepressant is more effective than switching to another.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 727 adult outpatients with a nonpsychotic major depressive disorder who had no remission of symptoms or could not tolerate the SSRI citalopram to receive one of the following drugs for up to 14 weeks: sustained-release bupropion (239 patients) at a maximal daily dose of 400 mg, sertraline (238 patients) at a maximal daily dose of 200 mg, or extended-release venlafaxine (250 patients) at a maximal daily dose of 375 mg. The study was conducted in 18 primary and 23 psychiatric care settings. The primary outcome was symptom remission, defined by a total score of 7 or less on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17) at the end of the study. Scores on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report (QIDS-SR-16), obtained at treatment visits, determined secondary outcomes, including remission (a score of 5 or less at exit) and response (a reduction of 50 percent or more on baseline scores).

RESULTS

Remission rates as assessed by the HRSD-17 and the QIDS-SR-16, respectively, were 21.3 percent and 25.5 percent for sustained-release bupropion, 17.6 percent and 26.6 percent for sertraline, and 24.8 percent and 25.0 percent for extended-release venlafaxine. QIDS-SR-16 response rates were 26.1 percent for sustained-release bupropion, 26.7 percent for sertraline, and 28.2 percent for extended-release venlafaxine. These treatments did not differ significantly with respect to outcomes, tolerability, or adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

After unsuccessful treatment with an SSRI, approximately one in four patients had a remission of symptoms after switching to another antidepressant. Any one of the medications in the study provided a reasonable second-step choice for patients with depression. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00021528.).

摘要

背景

使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)治疗抑郁症失败后,换用一种抗抑郁药是否比换用另一种更有效尚不清楚。

方法

我们将727例患有非精神病性重度抑郁症的成年门诊患者随机分组,这些患者症状未缓解或无法耐受SSRI西酞普兰,让他们接受以下药物之一治疗长达14周:最大日剂量400mg的缓释安非他酮(239例患者)、最大日剂量200mg的舍曲林(238例患者)或最大日剂量375mg的缓释文拉法辛(250例患者)。该研究在18个初级医疗机构和23个精神科护理机构进行。主要结局为症状缓解,定义为研究结束时17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HRSD-17)总分≤7分。治疗访视时获得的抑郁症状快速自评量表(QIDS-SR-16)评分确定次要结局,包括缓解(出组时评分≤5分)和反应(较基线评分降低50%或更多)。

结果

根据HRSD-17和QIDS-SR-16评估,缓释安非他酮的缓解率分别为21.3%和25.5%,舍曲林分别为17.6%和26.6%,缓释文拉法辛分别为24.8%和25.0%。QIDS-SR-16反应率方面,缓释安非他酮为26.1%,舍曲林为26.7%,缓释文拉法辛为28.2%。这些治疗在结局、耐受性或不良事件方面无显著差异。

结论

使用SSRI治疗失败后,约四分之一的患者换用另一种抗抑郁药后症状缓解。研究中的任何一种药物都为抑郁症患者提供了合理的第二步选择。(ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT00021528。)

相似文献

1
Bupropion-SR, sertraline, or venlafaxine-XR after failure of SSRIs for depression.对于抑郁症患者,在选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)治疗失败后使用安非他酮缓释片、舍曲林或文拉法辛缓释片。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 23;354(12):1231-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052963.
2
Medication augmentation after the failure of SSRIs for depression.5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗抑郁症失败后的药物增效治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 23;354(12):1243-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052964.
3
The impact of chronic depression on acute and long-term outcomes in a randomized trial comparing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor monotherapy versus each of 2 different antidepressant medication combinations.在一项比较选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂单药治疗与两种不同抗抑郁药物联合治疗的随机试验中,慢性抑郁症对急性和长期结局的影响。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;73(7):967-76. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07043. Epub 2012 May 29.
4
Selecting among second-step antidepressant medication monotherapies: predictive value of clinical, demographic, or first-step treatment features.在第二步抗抑郁药物单一疗法中进行选择:临床、人口统计学或第一步治疗特征的预测价值。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Aug;65(8):870-80. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.8.870.
5
What to Expect When Switching to a Second Antidepressant Medication Following an Ineffective Initial SSRI: A Report From the Randomized Clinical STAR*D Study.在初始 SSRI 治疗无效后改用第二种抗抑郁药时的预期:来自随机临床试验 STAR*D 的报告。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 11;81(5):19m12949. doi: 10.4088/JCP.19m12949.
6
Venlafaxine extended release versus citalopram in patients with depression unresponsive to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.对于对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂无反应的抑郁症患者,文拉法辛缓释剂与西酞普兰的对比研究
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 May;23(3):113-9. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3282f424c2.
7
Double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of the antidepressant efficacy and tolerability of bupropion XR and venlafaxine XR.双盲、安慰剂对照比较安非他酮 XR 和文拉法辛 XR 的抗抑郁疗效和耐受性。
J Psychopharmacol. 2010 Aug;24(8):1209-16. doi: 10.1177/0269881109106953. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
8
Efficacy of venlafaxine in patients with major depressive disorder who have unsustained or no response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: an open-label, uncontrolled study.文拉法辛对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂反应不佳或无反应的重度抑郁症患者的疗效:一项开放标签、非对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2002 Jul;24(7):1194-200. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)80029-7.
9
Efficacy of escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder compared with conventional selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine XR: a meta-analysis.与传统选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂及文拉法辛缓释剂相比,艾司西酞普兰治疗重度抑郁症的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2006 Mar;31(2):122-31.
10
Randomized trial of sertraline versus venlafaxine XR in major depression: efficacy and discontinuation symptoms.舍曲林与文拉法辛缓释剂治疗重度抑郁症的随机试验:疗效与停药症状
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;66(10):1312-20. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n1015.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacological Monotherapy for Depressive Disorders: Current and Future-A Narrative Review.抑郁症的药物单药治疗:现状与未来——一篇叙述性综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 21;61(4):558. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040558.
2
The Use of an Artificial Intelligence Platform OpenEvidence to Augment Clinical Decision-Making for Primary Care Physicians.使用人工智能平台OpenEvidence辅助初级保健医生进行临床决策。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251332215. doi: 10.1177/21501319251332215. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
3
Restoring STAR*D: A Reanalysis of Drug-Switch Therapy After Failed SSRI Treatment Using Patient-Level Data with Fidelity to the Original STAR*D Research Protocol.
恢复STAR*D研究:使用与原始STAR*D研究方案一致的患者水平数据对SSRI治疗失败后的药物转换治疗进行重新分析。
medRxiv. 2025 Feb 12:2025.02.10.25321991. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.10.25321991.
4
Trajectory of peripheral inflammation during index ECT in association with clinical outcomes in treatment-resistant depression.难治性抑郁症中,首次ECT期间外周炎症轨迹与临床结局的关系
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2024 Dec 15;43:100925. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100925. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bupropion versus aripiprazole augmentation in adults with treatment-resistant depression: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea.安非他酮与阿立哌唑增效治疗难治性抑郁症成人患者的疗效和安全性比较:韩国一项全国性队列研究
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 17;68(1):e22. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1815.
6
Pilot evaluation on an adapted tele-behavioral activation to increase physical activity in persons with depression: a single-arm pilot study.适应远程的行为激活治疗以增加抑郁患者身体活动的初步评估:一项单臂初步研究。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 9;12(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02053-5.
7
Stereochemical optimization of ,2-substituted cycloalkylamines as norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.作为去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂的1,2-二取代环烷基胺的立体化学优化
RSC Med Chem. 2024 Sep 12;15(12):4068-79. doi: 10.1039/d4md00521j.
8
Comparing Email Versus Text Messaging as Delivery Platforms for Supporting Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.比较电子邮件和短信作为支持重度抑郁症患者的交付平台:非劣效性随机对照试验。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 9;8:e59003. doi: 10.2196/59003.
9
Non-improvement predicts subsequent non-response to repeated-dose intravenous ketamine for depression: a re-analysis of a 2-week open-label study in patients with unipolar and bipolar depression.非改善预示着重复静脉注射氯胺酮治疗抑郁症的后续无反应:单相和双相抑郁症患者为期 2 周开放标签研究的再分析。
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 6;14(1):324. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03027-2.
10
Comparison of the Efficacy Between Standard Measurement-Base Care (MBC) and Enhanced MBC for Major Depressive Disorder: A Pilot Study.标准测量基础护理(MBC)与强化MBC治疗重度抑郁症的疗效比较:一项试点研究。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2024 Jul 29;20:1465-1473. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S468332. eCollection 2024.