Najarian J S, Fryd D S, Strand M, Canafax D M, Ascher N L, Payne W D, Simmons R L, Sutherland D E
Ann Surg. 1985 Feb;201(2):142-57. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198502000-00003.
Between September 26, 1980 and December 31, 1983, 230 splenectomized, transfused renal allograft recipients were randomized to treatment with either cyclosporin-prednisone (N = 121, 68 diabetic and 53 nondiabetic recipients; 73 cadaver and 48 related donor grafts) or azathioprine-prednisone-antilymphocyte globulin (N = 109, 61 diabetic and 48 nondiabetic recipients; 69 cadaver and 40 related donor grafts). The results were analyzed on March 31, 1984. Actuarial patient survival rates at 2 years were 88% in the cyclosporin and 91% in the azathioprine groups (p = 0.649). Graft survival rates at 2 years were 82% in all cyclosporin and 77% in all azathioprine-treated recipients (p = 0.150); the corresponding figures in the recipients of related donor grafts were 87% vs. 83% (p = 0.656), and in the recipients of cadaver donor grafts were 78% vs. 73% (p = 0.178). The 2-year graft survival rates were 81% in cyclosporin and 74% in azathioprine-treated diabetic recipients (p = 0.150) and 83% in cyclosporin and 81% in azathioprine-treated nondiabetic recipients (p = 0.604). Within the cyclosporin and azathioprine treatment groups, the differences in graft survival rates between diabetic and nondiabetic recipients were not significant (p = 0.822 and 0.423, respectively). Although there were no significant differences in graft survival rates, the cumulative incidence of rejection episodes within the first post-transplant year was significantly lower in the cyclosporin (34%) than in the azathioprine (60%) treated recipients (p = 0.001). In recipients of technically successful cadaver kidney grafts, the incidence of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) was 31% in cyclosporin and 30% in azathioprine-treated recipients (p = 0.822). Graft survival rates in azathioprine- and cyclosporin-treated recipients who did or did not undergo ATN were 72% vs. 89% (p = 0.011). The mean (+/- S.D.) serum creatinine levels (mg/dl) at 1 year were higher in cyclosporin (2.0 +/- 0.6) than in azathioprine (1.5 +/- 0.5) treated recipients (p = less than 0.001). A reduction in cyclosporin dose because of nephrotoxicity was required in 96 of the cyclosporin-treated patients (70%), and 25 were switched to treatment with azathioprine (21%). The incidence of all infections in cyclosporin-treated patients was approximately half of that in azathioprine-treated patients, and only nine per cent of the cyclosporin-treated patients were diagnosed to have cytomegalovirus infections during the first post-transplant year vs. 28% in azathioprine-treated patients (p = 0.002).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在1980年9月26日至1983年12月31日期间,230例接受脾切除及输血的肾移植受者被随机分为两组进行治疗,一组采用环孢素 - 泼尼松治疗(N = 121例,其中糖尿病受者68例,非糖尿病受者53例;73例接受尸体供肾移植,48例接受亲属供肾移植),另一组采用硫唑嘌呤 - 泼尼松 - 抗淋巴细胞球蛋白治疗(N = 109例,其中糖尿病受者61例,非糖尿病受者48例;69例接受尸体供肾移植,40例接受亲属供肾移植)。1984年3月31日对结果进行分析。环孢素组和硫唑嘌呤组患者2年的精算生存率分别为88%和91%(p = 0.649)。所有接受环孢素治疗和硫唑嘌呤治疗的受者2年的移植物生存率分别为82%和77%(p = 0.150);亲属供肾移植受者的相应数据为87%对83%(p = 0.656),尸体供肾移植受者为78%对73%(p = 0.178)。糖尿病受者中环孢素组和硫唑嘌呤组2年的移植物生存率分别为81%和74%(p = 0.150),非糖尿病受者中分别为83%和81%(p = 0.604)。在环孢素组和硫唑嘌呤组内,糖尿病受者与非糖尿病受者的移植物生存率差异无统计学意义(分别为p = 0.822和0.423)。虽然移植物生存率无显著差异,但移植后第一年环孢素治疗组排斥反应的累积发生率(34%)显著低于硫唑嘌呤治疗组(60%)(p = 0.001)。在技术成功的尸体肾移植受者中,环孢素治疗组急性肾小管坏死(ATN)的发生率为31%,硫唑嘌呤治疗组为30%(p = 0.822)。发生或未发生ATN的硫唑嘌呤治疗组和环孢素治疗组受者的移植物生存率分别为72%对89%(p = 0.011)。环孢素治疗组受者1年时的平均(±标准差)血清肌酐水平(mg/dl)(2.0±0.6)高于硫唑嘌呤治疗组(1.5±0.5)(p < 0.001)。96例环孢素治疗患者(70%)因肾毒性需要减少环孢素剂量,25例(21%)改用硫唑嘌呤治疗。环孢素治疗患者的所有感染发生率约为硫唑嘌呤治疗患者的一半,移植后第一年环孢素治疗患者中仅9%被诊断为巨细胞病毒感染,而硫唑嘌呤治疗患者中为28%(p = 0.002)。(摘要截取自400字)