Vingerhoets A J, Marcelissen F H
Department of Medical Psychology, Free University Amsterdam, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Soc Sci Med. 1988;26(3):279-91. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90392-9.
In this article the contribution of nine approaches to stress research is discussed. These approaches are: (1) the biological approach; (2) the (classic) psychosomatic approach; (3) the life event approach; (4) interactionistic or transactional approaches; (5) life style and behavior; (6) group differences; (7) sociocultural (macro-)factors; (8) work and organizational psychology; and (9) intervention and prevention. It is concluded that, more and more, exchanges take place between different approaches and that the willingness to collaborate increases. Not only do we observe collaboration between different disciplines, there also are examples of an integration of laboratory research and field research. In addition, interest of animal workers for human research and vice versa seems to increase. Although it is realized that stress research has its own inherent characteristic problems (e.g. ethics), the authors feel that the future still can bring important progress.
本文讨论了九种压力研究方法的贡献。这些方法包括：（1）生物学方法；（2）（经典的）身心方法；（3）生活事件方法；（4）交互作用或交易方法；（5）生活方式和行为；（6）群体差异；（7）社会文化（宏观）因素；（8）工作与组织心理学；以及（9）干预与预防。得出的结论是，不同方法之间的交流越来越多，合作意愿也在增强。我们不仅观察到不同学科之间的合作，也有实验室研究与实地研究整合的例子。此外，动物研究人员对人类研究的兴趣以及反之亦然的情况似乎都在增加。尽管人们意识到压力研究有其自身固有的特征问题（如伦理问题），但作者们认为未来仍能取得重要进展。
