Opinion: Science policy for scientists: A simple task for great effect.
作者信息
Gaieck William, Lawrence J P, Montchal Maria, Pandori William, Valdez-Ward Evelyn
机构信息
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697.
出版信息
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 1;117(35):20977-20981. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012824117. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Opinion: Science policy for scientists: A simple task for great effect.观点：面向科学家的科学政策：一项收效显著的简单任务。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 1;117(35):20977-20981. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012824117. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
2
Inadvertent advocacy.无意倡导。
Conserv Biol. 2012 Feb;26(1):39-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01805.x.
3
Values, objectivity and credibility of scientists in a contentious natural resource debate.有争议的自然资源争论中的科学家价值观、客观性和公信力。
Public Underst Sci. 2012 Jan;21(1):101-25. doi: 10.1177/0963662510371435.
4
Values in environmental research: Citizens' views of scientists who acknowledge values.环境研究中的价值观：公民对承认价值观的科学家的看法。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 25;12(10):e0186049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186049. eCollection 2017.
5
Researchers must be aware of their roles at the interface of ecosystem services science and policy.研究人员必须意识到自己在生态系统服务科学与政策界面中的角色。
Ambio. 2018 Feb;47(1):97-105. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-0939-1. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
6
Science, policy advocacy, and marine protected areas.科学、政策倡导与海洋保护区。
Conserv Biol. 2009 Apr;23(2):460-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01093.x. Epub 2008 Nov 2.
7
Can scientists and policy makers work together?科学家和政策制定者能携手合作吗？
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Aug;59(8):632-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.031765.
8
Influencing science policy in Japan.影响日本的科学政策。
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Dec;2(12):933-5. doi: 10.1038/35103093.
9
A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.理解生态学和保护学中科学实践差距成因观点的概念框架。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 May;93(2):1032-1055. doi: 10.1111/brv.12385. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?理性的诱惑：为何缺陷模型在科学传播中持续存在？
Public Underst Sci. 2016 May;25(4):400-14. doi: 10.1177/0963662516629749.
引用本文的文献
1
Engaging Scientists in Science Policy: Experiences From Canada.让科学家参与科学政策制定：来自加拿大的经验
Public Health Rev. 2025 Apr 25;46:1607130. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2025.1607130. eCollection 2025.
2
Methods in HIV-Related Intersectional Stigma Research: Core Elements and Opportunities.HIV 相关交叉污名研究方法：核心要素和机遇。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Jun;112(S4):S413-S419. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306710.
3
Politics overwhelms science in the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from the whole coverage of the Italian quality newspapers.在新冠疫情大流行期间，政治压倒了科学：来自意大利所有优质报纸全面报道的证据。
PLoS One. 2021 May 20;16(5):e0252034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252034. eCollection 2021.
Zotero 插件