• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CrossFit体能表现与基于实验室的体能测量之间的关系。

The Relationship between CrossFit Performance and Laboratory-Based Measurements of Fitness.

作者信息

Zeitz Elisabeth K, Cook Lena F, Dexheimer Joshua D, Lemez Srdjan, Leyva Whitney D, Terbio Immanuel Y, Tran Justin R, Jo Edward

机构信息

Human Performance Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, California State University Pomona, Pomona, CA 92805, USA.

Department of Kinesiology, Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, CA 91702, USA.

出版信息

Sports (Basel). 2020 Aug 11;8(8):112. doi: 10.3390/sports8080112.

DOI:10.3390/sports8080112
PMID:32796573
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7466681/
Abstract

To date, research has examined the physiological determinants of performance in standardized CrossFit (CF) workouts but not without the influence of CF familiarity. Therefore, the purpose of this present study was to examine the predictive value of aerobic fitness, body composition, and total body strength on performance of two standardized CF workouts in CF-naïve participants. Twenty-two recreationally trained individuals (males = 13, females = 9) underwent assessments of peak oxygen consumption (VO peak), ventilatory thresholds, body composition, and one repetition maximum tests for the back squat, deadlift, and overhead press in which the sum equaled the CF Total. Participants also performed two CF workouts: a scaled version of the CF Open workout 19.1 and a modified version of the CF Benchmark workout Fran to determine scores based on total repetitions completed and time-to-completion, respectively. Simple Pearson's r correlations were used to determine the relationships between CF performance variables (19.1 and modified Fran) and the independent variables. A forward stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed and significant variables that survived the regression analysis were used to create a predictive model of CF performance. Absolute VO peak was a significant predictor of 19.1 performance, explaining 39% of its variance (adjusted R = 0.39, = 0.002). For modified Fran, CF Total was a significant predictor and explained 33% of the variance in performance (adjusted R = 0.33, = 0.005). These results suggest, without any influence of CF familiarity or experience, that performance in these two CF workouts could be predicted by distinct laboratory-based measurements of fitness.

摘要

迄今为止,已有研究探讨了标准化CrossFit(CF)训练中运动表现的生理决定因素,但这些研究都受到了对CF熟悉程度的影响。因此,本研究的目的是在从未接触过CF的参与者中,检验有氧适能、身体成分和全身力量对两项标准化CF训练表现的预测价值。22名接受过休闲训练的个体(男性13名,女性9名)接受了峰值耗氧量(VO₂峰值)、通气阈值、身体成分评估,以及后深蹲、硬拉和卧推的一次重复最大值测试,这些测试的总和等于CF总分。参与者还进行了两项CF训练:CF公开赛19.1训练的简化版和CF基准训练Fran的修改版,分别根据完成的总重复次数和完成时间来确定分数。使用简单的Pearson积矩相关系数来确定CF表现变量(19.1训练和修改后的Fran训练)与自变量之间的关系。进行了向前逐步多元线性回归分析,将回归分析中留存的显著变量用于建立CF表现的预测模型。绝对VO₂峰值是19.1训练表现的显著预测指标,解释了其39%的方差(调整后R² = 0.39,p = 0.002)。对于修改后的Fran训练,CF总分是显著预测指标,解释了33%的表现方差(调整后R² = 0.33,p = 0.005)。这些结果表明,在没有CF熟悉程度或经验影响的情况下,这两项CF训练的表现可以通过基于实验室的不同体能测量来预测。

相似文献

1
The Relationship between CrossFit Performance and Laboratory-Based Measurements of Fitness.CrossFit体能表现与基于实验室的体能测量之间的关系。
Sports (Basel). 2020 Aug 11;8(8):112. doi: 10.3390/sports8080112.
2
Physiological Performance Measures as Indicators of CrossFit Performance.作为CrossFit运动表现指标的生理性能测量
Sports (Basel). 2019 Apr 22;7(4):93. doi: 10.3390/sports7040093.
3
Do physiological measures predict selected CrossFit(®) benchmark performance?生理指标能否预测特定的CrossFit(®)基准测试表现?
Open Access J Sports Med. 2015 Jul 31;6:241-7. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S88265. eCollection 2015.
4
Predicting the Unknown and the Unknowable. Are Anthropometric Measures and Fitness Profile Associated with the Outcome of a Simulated CrossFit Competition?预测未知和不可知的事情。人体测量指标和健康状况与模拟 CrossFit 比赛的结果有关吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;18(7):3692. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073692.
5
The relationship of aerobic capacity, anaerobic peak power and experience to performance in CrossFit exercise.有氧能力、无氧峰值功率与经验对CrossFit运动表现的关系。
Biol Sport. 2015 Nov;32(4):315-20. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1174771. Epub 2015 Oct 18.
6
Analysis of Morphofunctional Variables Associated with Performance in Crossfit Competitors.与Crossfit运动员表现相关的形态功能变量分析。
J Hum Kinet. 2020 Jul 21;73:83-91. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0134. eCollection 2020 Jul.
7
Physical and Physiological Predictors of FRAN CrossFit WOD Athlete's Performance.FRAN 交叉健身运动员表现的身体和生理预测指标。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 12;18(8):4070. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084070.
8
Determination of a CrossFit Benchmark Performance Profile.确定一项CrossFit基准表现概况。
Sports (Basel). 2021 Jun 2;9(6):80. doi: 10.3390/sports9060080.
9
Workout Pacing Predictors of Crossfit Open Performance: A Pilot Study.Crossfit公开赛事表现的训练节奏预测因素:一项初步研究。
J Hum Kinet. 2021 Mar 31;78:89-100. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2021-0043. eCollection 2021 Mar.
10
Physiological Predictors of Competition Performance in CrossFit Athletes.CrossFit 运动员比赛表现的生理预测因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 24;17(10):3699. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103699.

引用本文的文献

1
Workout Duration Alters the Importance of Predictive Traits on High-Intensity Functional Training Workout Performance.锻炼时长会改变预测性特征对高强度功能性训练锻炼表现的重要性。
Sports (Basel). 2025 May 22;13(6):156. doi: 10.3390/sports13060156.
2
Exploring the relationship between Total Athleticism score and CrossFit® Open Performance in amateur athletes: single measure involving body fat percentage, aerobic capacity, muscle power and local muscle endurance.探索业余运动员的综合运动能力得分与CrossFit®公开赛表现之间的关系:一项涉及体脂百分比、有氧能力、肌肉力量和局部肌肉耐力的单一测量。
Eur J Transl Myol. 2024 Aug 23;34(3):12309. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.12309.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Physiological Predictors of Competition Performance in CrossFit Athletes.CrossFit 运动员比赛表现的生理预测因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 24;17(10):3699. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103699.
2
Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults.高级 CrossFit 运动员、休闲 CrossFit 参与者和身体活跃成年人之间的生理差异。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 7;15(4):e0223548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223548. eCollection 2020.
3
Full-Squat as a Determinant of Performance in CrossFit.
Physical and Physiological Characteristics of Elite CrossFit Athletes.
精英CrossFit运动员的身体和生理特征。
Sports (Basel). 2024 Jun 12;12(6):162. doi: 10.3390/sports12060162.
4
The influence of sex-division, experience, and pacing strategy on performance in the 2020 CrossFit® Open.性别划分、经验和节奏策略对2020年CrossFit®公开赛成绩的影响。
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Jan 19;6:1344036. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1344036. eCollection 2024.
5
Assessment of Cardiorespiratory and Metabolic Contributions in an Extreme Intensity CrossFit Benchmark Workout.评估极端强度 CrossFit 基准训练中的心肺代谢贡献。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 14;24(2):513. doi: 10.3390/s24020513.
6
Differential improvements between men and women in repeated CrossFit open workouts.男性和女性在重复 CrossFit 公开赛训练中表现出的差异改善。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0283910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283910. eCollection 2023.
7
Pacing Strategies Differ by Sex and Rank in 2020 CrossFit Open Tests.2020年CrossFit公开赛测试中的配速策略因性别和级别而异。
Sports (Basel). 2023 Oct 11;11(10):199. doi: 10.3390/sports11100199.
8
CrossFit: 'Unknowable' or Predictable?-A Systematic Review on Predictors of CrossFit Performance.CrossFit:“不可知”还是可预测?——关于CrossFit运动表现预测因素的系统评价
Sports (Basel). 2023 May 30;11(6):112. doi: 10.3390/sports11060112.
9
Normative Scores for CrossFit Open Workouts: 2011-2022.CrossFit公开赛训练的标准分数:2011 - 2022年
Sports (Basel). 2023 Jan 18;11(2):24. doi: 10.3390/sports11020024.
10
Acute physiological outcomes of high-intensity functional training: a scoping review.高强度功能性训练的急性生理结果:范围综述。
PeerJ. 2023 Jan 3;11:e14493. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14493. eCollection 2023.
全蹲作为 CrossFit 表现的决定因素。
Int J Sports Med. 2019 Sep;40(9):592-596. doi: 10.1055/a-0960-9717. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
4
Is Perceived Exertion a Useful Indicator of the Metabolic and Cardiovascular Responses to a Metabolic Conditioning Session of Functional Fitness?自觉用力程度是否是功能性健身代谢训练课中代谢和心血管反应的有用指标?
Sports (Basel). 2019 Jul 4;7(7):161. doi: 10.3390/sports7070161.
5
Physiological Performance Measures as Indicators of CrossFit Performance.作为CrossFit运动表现指标的生理性能测量
Sports (Basel). 2019 Apr 22;7(4):93. doi: 10.3390/sports7040093.
6
Precision of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Reflection Scans in Muscular Athletes.双能X线吸收法反射扫描在肌肉发达运动员中的准确性
J Clin Densitom. 2020 Oct-Dec;23(4):647-655. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
7
High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT): Definition and Research Implications for Improved Fitness.高强度功能性训练(HIFT):改善体能的定义及研究意义
Sports (Basel). 2018 Aug 7;6(3):76. doi: 10.3390/sports6030076.
8
Effects of Combined Strength and Sprint Training on Lean Mass, Strength, Power, and Sprint Performance in Masters Road Cyclists.力量与短跑训练结合对成年自行车运动员瘦体重、力量、功率和短跑表现的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jan;33(1):66-79. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001960.
9
Self-reported Measures of Strength and Sport-Specific Skills Distinguish Ranking in an International Online Fitness Competition.自我报告的力量测量和运动专项技能在国际在线健身比赛中区分排名。
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Dec;32(12):3474-3484. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001843.
10
The relationship of aerobic capacity, anaerobic peak power and experience to performance in CrossFit exercise.有氧能力、无氧峰值功率与经验对CrossFit运动表现的关系。
Biol Sport. 2015 Nov;32(4):315-20. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1174771. Epub 2015 Oct 18.