Suppr超能文献

与Crossfit运动员表现相关的形态功能变量分析。

Analysis of Morphofunctional Variables Associated with Performance in Crossfit Competitors.

作者信息

Gómez-Landero Luis Arturo, Frías-Menacho Juan Miguel

机构信息

Department of Sport and Computer Science, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain.

Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain.

出版信息

J Hum Kinet. 2020 Jul 21;73:83-91. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0134. eCollection 2020 Jul.

Abstract

CrossFit® is a competitive sport and fitness modality characterized by multiple physical capabilities and multi-joint movements. This study aimed to analyse and classify variables related to CrossFit® competitors' specific performance. Fifteen male CrossFit® competitors were selected (n = 15; 30.57 ± 5.5 years; 1.76 ± 0.06 m; 78.55 ± 9.12 kg). Mean values were obtained for body mass index (25.3 ± 2.14 kg/m2), 4 skinfolds, 1 repetition maximum in the squat (137.60 ± 19.65 kg) and the bench press (101.67 ± 10.64 kg), maximum pull-ups (18.87 ± 5.05), sit-ups in 60 s (46.60 ± 4.22), peak power in the countermovement jump (3908.04 ± 423.68 W), VO2max with a shuttle run test (47.70 ± 4.79 ml kg-1·min-1), and time in the Workout of the Day (WOD) "Fran" (337.13 ± 119.19 s) and "Donkey Kong" (417.47 ± 98.44 s) components. Principal component analysis was conducted to classify variables and to select those most related to each new component ("strength and muscle mass", "adiposity" and "aerobic capacity"). The correlation matrix was analysed, indicating significant correlations between "Donkey Kong" and VO2max (r = -.675; p " .01), suprailiac skinfold (r = .713; p " .01) and sit-ups (r = -.563; p " .05); and between "Fran" and squat (r = -.528; p " .05). Three important components characterizing CrossFit® competitors were identified: "strength and muscle mass", low "adiposity" and "aerobic capacity". Significant relationships between morphofunctional variables and Crossfit® performance were found in Crossfit® competitors.

摘要

CrossFit®是一项竞技运动和健身方式,其特点是具备多种身体能力和多关节运动。本研究旨在分析和分类与CrossFit®参赛者特定表现相关的变量。选取了15名男性CrossFit®参赛者(n = 15;年龄30.57±5.5岁;身高1.76±0.06米;体重78.55±9.12千克)。获取了以下各项的平均值:体重指数(25.3±2.14千克/平方米)、4处皮褶厚度、深蹲1次最大重复量(137.60±19.65千克)和卧推1次最大重复量(101.67±10.64千克)、最大引体向上次数(18.87±5.05)、60秒内仰卧起坐次数(46.60±4.22)、反向纵跳峰值功率(3908.04±423.68瓦)、通过往返跑测试测得的最大摄氧量(47.70±4.79毫升·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹),以及每日训练(WOD)“Fran”项目用时(337.13±119.19秒)和“Donkey Kong”项目用时(417.47±98.44秒)。进行主成分分析以对变量进行分类,并选出与每个新成分(“力量和肌肉量”、“肥胖度”和“有氧能力”)最相关的变量。分析了相关矩阵,结果表明“Donkey Kong”与最大摄氧量(r = -0.675;p < 0.01)、髂上皮肤褶厚度(r = 0.713;p < 0.01)和仰卧起坐次数(r = -0.563;p < 0.05)之间存在显著相关性;“Fran”与深蹲(r = -0.528;p < 0.05)之间存在显著相关性。确定了表征CrossFit®参赛者的三个重要成分:“力量和肌肉量”、低“肥胖度”和“有氧能力”。在CrossFit®参赛者中发现了形态功能变量与Crossfit®表现之间的显著关系。

相似文献

5
Physiological Predictors of Competition Performance in CrossFit Athletes.CrossFit 运动员比赛表现的生理预测因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 24;17(10):3699. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103699.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
CrossFit Overview: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.CrossFit概述:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Sports Med Open. 2018 Feb 26;4(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40798-018-0124-5.
3
The Benefits and Risks of CrossFit: A Systematic Review.CrossFit的益处与风险:一项系统综述
Workplace Health Saf. 2017 Dec;65(12):612-618. doi: 10.1177/2165079916685568. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
5
Electromyographic analysis of muscle activation during pull-up variations.引体向上变式动作中肌肉激活的肌电图分析
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2017 Feb;32:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
6
Physical Predictors of Elite Skeleton Start Performance.优秀雪橇起始表现的身体预测指标
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Jan;12(1):81-89. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0631. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
8
Core Muscle Activation in One-Armed and Two-Armed Kettlebell Swing.单臂和双臂壶铃摆动时的核心肌肉激活
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 May;30(5):1196-204. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001240.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验