Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Department of Pharmacology and Personalised Medicine, MeHNS, FHML, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2021;264:169-204. doi: 10.1007/164_2020_382.
The 1998 Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology for the discovery of nitric oxide, a nitrogen containing reactive oxygen species (also termed reactive nitrogen or reactive nitrogen/oxygen species) stirred great hopes. Clinical applications, however, have so far pertained exclusively to the downstream signaling of cGMP enhancing drugs such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors and soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators. All clinical attempts, so far, to inhibit NOS have failed even though preclinical models were strikingly positive and clinical biomarkers correlated perfectly. This rather casts doubt on our current way of target identification in drug discovery in general and our way of patient stratification based on correlating but not causal biomarkers or symptoms. The opposite, NO donors, nitrite and enhancing NO synthesis by eNOS/NOS3 recoupling in situations of NO deficiency, are rapidly declining in clinical relevance or hold promise but need yet to enter formal therapeutic guidelines, respectively. Nevertheless, NOS inhibition in situations of NO overproduction often jointly with enhanced superoxide (or hydrogen peroxide production) still holds promise, but most likely only in acute conditions such as neurotrauma (Stover et al., J Neurotrauma 31(19):1599-1606, 2014) and stroke (Kleinschnitz et al., J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1508-1512, 2016; Casas et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116(14):7129-7136, 2019). Conversely, in chronic conditions, long-term inhibition of NOS might be too risky because of off-target effects on eNOS/NOS3 in particular for patients with cardiovascular risks or metabolic and renal diseases. Nitric oxide synthases (NOS) and their role in health (green) and disease (red). Only neuronal/type 1 NOS (NOS1) has a high degree of clinical validation and is in late stage development for traumatic brain injury, followed by a phase II safety/efficacy trial in ischemic stroke. The pathophysiology of NOS1 (Kleinschnitz et al., J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1508-1512, 2016) is likely to be related to parallel superoxide or hydrogen peroxide formation (Kleinschnitz et al., J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1508-1512, 2016; Casas et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(46):12315-12320, 2017; Casas et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116(14):7129-7136, 2019) leading to peroxynitrite and protein nitration, etc. Endothelial/type 3 NOS (NOS3) is considered protective only and its inhibition should be avoided. The preclinical evidence for a role of high-output inducible/type 2 NOS (NOS2) isoform in sepsis, asthma, rheumatic arthritis, etc. was high, but all clinical development trials in these indications were neutral despite target engagement being validated. This casts doubt on the role of NOS2 in humans in health and disease (hence the neutral, black coloring).
1998 年诺贝尔医学和生理学奖授予发现一氧化氮(一种含氮的活性氧物质,也称为活性氮或活性氮/氧物质)的科学家,这一发现激发了人们的巨大希望。然而,临床应用迄今为止仅限于 cGMP 增强药物的下游信号转导,如磷酸二酯酶抑制剂和可溶性鸟苷酸环化酶刺激剂。尽管临床前模型非常积极,临床生物标志物也完全相关,但迄今为止,所有抑制 NOS 的临床尝试都失败了。这让人对我们目前在药物发现中的靶点识别方式以及基于相关但非因果生物标志物或症状进行患者分层的方式产生了怀疑。相反,NO 供体、亚硝酸盐和在 NO 缺乏时通过 eNOS/NOS3 重新偶联增强 NO 合成,在临床相关性方面正在迅速下降,或者有希望但仍需要进入正式的治疗指南,分别。然而,NO 过度产生时的 NOS 抑制通常与增强的超氧化物(或过氧化氢产生)联合使用仍有希望,但很可能仅在神经创伤等急性情况下有效(Stover 等人,J Neurotrauma 31(19):1599-1606, 2014)和中风(Kleinschnitz 等人,J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1508-1512, 2016;Casas 等人,Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116(14):7129-7136, 2019)。相反,在慢性疾病中,由于对 eNOS/NOS3 的脱靶效应,特别是对心血管风险或代谢和肾脏疾病患者,长期抑制 NOS 可能风险太大。一氧化氮合酶(NOS)及其在健康(绿色)和疾病(红色)中的作用。只有神经元/类型 1 NOS(NOS1)具有高度的临床验证,并处于创伤性脑损伤的后期开发阶段,随后在缺血性中风中进行 II 期安全性/疗效试验。NOS1 的病理生理学(Kleinschnitz 等人,J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1508-1512, 2016)可能与平行的超氧化物或过氧化氢形成(Kleinschnitz 等人,J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1508-1512, 2016;Casas 等人,Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(46):12315-12320, 2017;Casas 等人,Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116(14):7129-7136, 2019)导致过氧亚硝酸盐和蛋白质硝化等。内皮/类型 3 NOS(NOS3)被认为是保护性的,应避免抑制。高输出诱导/类型 2 NOS(NOS2)同工酶在败血症、哮喘、风湿性关节炎等方面的作用的临床前证据很高,但所有这些适应症的临床开发试验均为中性,尽管已验证了靶点结合。这让人对 NOS2 在健康和疾病中的人类作用产生了怀疑(因此为中性,黑色)。