• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国的灾难性医疗支出:堕胎

Abortion as a Catastrophic Health Expenditure in the United States.

机构信息

Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Womens Health Issues. 2020 Nov-Dec;30(6):416-425. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2020.07.001
PMID:32798085
Abstract

PURPOSE

Abortion is a critical reproductive health service that is difficult for many in the United States to afford owing to policies aimed at restricting insurance coverage of this basic health service. This article assesses whether the resulting high out-of-pocket cost for abortion could be considered a catastrophic health expenditure, and explores potential policies that could prevent households from experiencing financial hardship or impoverishment.

METHODS

We assessed if the average costs of a first and second trimester abortion procedure in 2016 were catastrophic health expenditures by applying a 40% threshold to the monthly nonsubsistence income of households earning their state's median income in all 50 states and Washington, DC.

RESULTS

The out-of-pocket cost for a first trimester abortion procedure would have been catastrophic for households earning their state's median monthly income in 39 states. In nine of these states, the average cost was between 100% and 199% of a household's nonsubsistence income, and in another nine states, this cost was at least double a household's nonsubsistence income. The out-of-pocket cost of a second trimester abortion would have been catastrophic for households earning their state's median monthly income in all 50 states and Washington, DC.

CONCLUSIONS

In a majority of states, the out-of-pocket cost of an abortion is financially catastrophic for households earning no more than their state's median monthly income. The United States should implement policies to create or improve health care safety nets to guarantee abortion care for all individuals, regardless of their income or insurance status.

摘要

目的

堕胎是一项重要的生殖健康服务,但由于政策旨在限制对这项基本健康服务的保险覆盖范围,许多美国人难以负担堕胎费用。本文评估了堕胎的高额自付费用是否可以被视为灾难性的健康支出,并探讨了一些潜在的政策,以防止家庭陷入经济困难或贫困。

方法

我们通过将 40%的门槛应用于各州和华盛顿特区中等收入家庭的月非生存收入,评估了 2016 年第一和第二孕期堕胎手术的平均费用是否构成灾难性的健康支出。

结果

在 39 个州,第一孕期堕胎手术的自付费用对于赚取本州中等月收入的家庭来说将是灾难性的。在其中九个州,平均费用在家庭非生存收入的 100%至 199%之间,在另外九个州,这一费用至少是家庭非生存收入的两倍。在所有 50 个州和华盛顿特区,第二孕期堕胎手术的自付费用对于赚取本州中等月收入的家庭来说将是灾难性的。

结论

在大多数州,对于收入不超过本州中等月收入的家庭来说,堕胎的自付费用在经济上是灾难性的。美国应该实施政策,建立或改善医疗保障安全网,以确保所有个人都能获得堕胎护理,无论其收入或保险状况如何。

相似文献

1
Abortion as a Catastrophic Health Expenditure in the United States.美国的灾难性医疗支出:堕胎
Womens Health Issues. 2020 Nov-Dec;30(6):416-425. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
2
Out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage for abortion in the United States.美国堕胎的自付费用和保险覆盖范围。
Womens Health Issues. 2014 Mar-Apr;24(2):e211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.01.003.
3
Porous safety net: catastrophic health expenditure and its determinants among insured households in Togo.多孔安全网:多哥参保家庭中的灾难性医疗支出及其决定因素
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 12;18(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2974-4.
4
Economic Burden of Chronic Ill Health and Injuries for Households in Low- and Middle-Income Countries低收入和中等收入国家家庭慢性疾病和伤害的经济负担
5
Association of Out-of-Pocket Annual Health Expenditures With Financial Hardship in Low-Income Adults With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in the United States.美国患有动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的低收入成年人中,年度自付医疗费用与经济困难的关联。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Aug 1;3(8):729-738. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1813.
6
Association of the US Affordable Care Act With Out-of-Pocket Spending and Catastrophic Health Expenditures Among Adult Patients With Traumatic Injury.美国平价医疗法案与创伤成年患者自付支出和灾难性医疗支出的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e200157. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0157.
7
Catastrophic healthcare expenditure and poverty related to out-of-pocket payments for healthcare in Bangladesh-an estimation of financial risk protection of universal health coverage.孟加拉国医疗保健支出的灾难性影响和与医疗保健自付费用相关的贫困问题——全民健康覆盖的财务风险保护评估。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Oct 1;32(8):1102-1110. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx048.
8
Catastrophic health expenses and impoverishment of households of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者家庭的灾难性医疗支出与贫困状况
Reumatol Clin. 2012 Jul-Aug;8(4):168-73. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
9
Medical cost trends under national health insurance benefit extension in Republic of Korea.韩国国家健康保险福利扩大下的医疗费用趋势。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2020 Nov;35(6):1351-1370. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3018. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
10
Catastrophic health care expenditure in Myanmar: policy implications in leading progress towards universal health coverage.缅甸灾难性医疗支出:在推动全民健康覆盖方面的政策意义。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jul 30;18(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1018-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Place Matters: Geographic Distribution of Abortion Fund Services.地点很重要:堕胎基金服务的地理分布
Health Equity. 2025 Aug 22;9(1):397-404. doi: 10.1177/24731242251369612. eCollection 2025.
2
Changes in abortion access after implementation of Medicaid coverage in Illinois: a retrospective analysis.伊利诺伊州实施医疗补助覆盖范围后堕胎服务可及性的变化:一项回顾性分析
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Apr 17;3(1):e001966. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001966. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Making sense of the economics of abortion in the United States.
理解美国堕胎经济学。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):199-210. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12288. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
4
Catastrophic Health Expenditures for In-State and Out-of-State Abortion Care.州内和州外堕胎护理的灾难性医疗支出。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2444146. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44146.
5
Seeking financial and practical support in an abortion-hostile state: Analysis of abortion fund data in Kentucky, 2014-2021: Analysis of abortion fund data in Kentucky.在堕胎敌对州寻求财务和实际支持:肯塔基州 2014-2021 年堕胎基金数据分析
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):222-227. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12279. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
6
Lifetime abortion incidence when abortion care is covered by Medicaid: Maryland versus five comparison states.当医疗补助计划涵盖堕胎护理时的终身堕胎发生率:马里兰州与五个对比州。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;59(5):e14358. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14358. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
7
Protect and Control: Coverture's Logics Across Welfare Policy and Abortion Law.保护与控制:“夫权制”在福利政策与堕胎法中的逻辑
Psychol Women Q. 2023 Dec;47(4):478-493. doi: 10.1177/03616843231186320. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
8
Patient experiences using public and private insurance coverage for abortion in Illinois: Implementation successes and remaining gaps.伊利诺伊州患者使用公共和私人保险覆盖堕胎的经历:实施成功和遗留差距。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):269-281. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12259. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
9
The Role of Telehealth in Promoting Equitable Abortion Access in the United States: Spatial Analysis.远程医疗在美国促进公平堕胎获取中的作用:空间分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Nov 7;9:e45671. doi: 10.2196/45671.
10
Measurement and Operationalization of the Social Determinants of Health and Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Use in the U.S.: A Systematic Scoping Review.美国健康社会决定因素与长效可逆避孕方法使用情况的测量及操作化:一项系统综述
AJPM Focus. 2022 Sep 12;1(2):100032. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100032. eCollection 2022 Dec.