• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Lifetime abortion incidence when abortion care is covered by Medicaid: Maryland versus five comparison states.当医疗补助计划涵盖堕胎护理时的终身堕胎发生率:马里兰州与五个对比州。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;59(5):e14358. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14358. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
2
Out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage for abortion in the United States.美国堕胎的自付费用和保险覆盖范围。
Womens Health Issues. 2014 Mar-Apr;24(2):e211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.01.003.
3
Surveillance for Health Care Access and Health Services Use, Adults Aged 18-64 Years - Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2014.18-64岁成年人医疗保健可及性与医疗服务利用情况监测——美国行为危险因素监测系统,2014年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Feb 24;66(7):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6607a1.
4
At what cost? Payment for abortion care by U.S. women.付出了什么代价?美国女性堕胎护理的支付方式。
Womens Health Issues. 2013 May-Jun;23(3):e173-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.03.001.
5
A Qualitative Exploration of Low-Income Women's Experiences Accessing Abortion in Massachusetts.对马萨诸塞州低收入女性获取堕胎服务经历的定性探索。
Womens Health Issues. 2015 Sep-Oct;25(5):463-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Jun 13.
6
Does Medicaid Insurance Confer Adequate Access to Adult Orthopaedic Care in the Era of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act?在《患者保护与平价医疗法案》时代,医疗补助保险能否提供足够的成人骨科护理服务?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jun;475(6):1527-1536. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5263-3. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
7
Does medicaid coverage matter?: A qualitative multi-state study of abortion affordability for low-income women.医疗补助覆盖范围重要吗?:一项针对低收入女性堕胎可负担性的多州定性研究。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2014 Nov;25(4):1571-85. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2014.0151.
8
Estimating Prevalence of Abortion Using List Experiments: Findings from a Survey of Women in Delaware and Maryland.使用列表实验估计堕胎的流行率:来自特拉华州和马里兰州妇女调查的结果。
Womens Health Issues. 2022 Jan-Feb;32(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
9
Implications of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act on Insurance Coverage and Rehabilitation Use Among Young Adult Trauma Patients.《患者保护与平价医疗法案》对青年创伤患者保险覆盖范围和康复使用的影响。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Dec 21;151(12):e163609. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.3609.
10
Distance traveled for Medicaid-covered abortion care in California.加利福尼亚州为医疗补助覆盖的堕胎护理所行进的距离。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 19;17(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2241-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing Abortion Underreporting in Surveys with the List Experiment: Lifetime and Five-Year Abortion Incidence with Multivariate Estimation of Socio-demographic Associations in two U.S. States.使用列表实验解决调查中堕胎报告不足的问题:美国两个州的终生和五年堕胎发生率以及社会人口学关联的多变量估计
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2025 Feb;44(1). doi: 10.1007/s11113-024-09925-z. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
2
Changes in abortion access after implementation of Medicaid coverage in Illinois: a retrospective analysis.伊利诺伊州实施医疗补助覆盖范围后堕胎服务可及性的变化:一项回顾性分析
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Apr 17;3(1):e001966. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001966. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Making sense of the economics of abortion in the United States.理解美国堕胎经济学。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):199-210. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12288. Epub 2024 Nov 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicaid's role in alleviating some of the financial burden of abortion: Findings from the 2021-2022 Abortion Patient Survey.医疗补助在减轻堕胎部分经济负担方面的作用:2021-2022 年堕胎患者调查结果。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):244-254. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12250. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
2
The Provision of Abortion Care via Telehealth in the United States: A Rapid Review.美国通过远程医疗提供堕胎护理:快速审查。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023 Nov-Dec;68(6):744-758. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13586. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
3
Respondent-Driven Sampling for Estimation of the Cumulative Lifetime Incidence of Abortion in Soweto, Johannesburg, South Africa: A Methodological Assessment.南非约翰内斯堡索韦托地区堕胎累积终身发病率估计中的应答者驱动抽样:方法学评估
Am J Epidemiol. 2023 Jul 7;192(7):1081-1092. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad074.
4
Design and Implementation of the Surveys of Women: Protocol for an Address-Based Sampling Multimodal Study.女性调查的设计与实施:基于地址抽样的多模式研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 15;12:e40675. doi: 10.2196/40675.
5
Randomized experimental testing of new survey approaches to improve abortion reporting in the United States.随机实验测试新的调查方法,以改善美国的堕胎报告。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2022 Dec;54(4):142-155. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12217. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
6
Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.美国多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案前后的堕胎设施出行时间估计和空间可达性。
JAMA. 2022 Nov 22;328(20):2041-2047. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.20424.
7
The End of Roe v Wade and New Legal Frontiers on the Constitutional Right to Abortion.罗诉韦德案的终结与堕胎宪法权利的新法律前沿
JAMA. 2022 Jul 26;328(4):325-326. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.12397.
8
Comparison of abortion incidence estimates derived from direct survey questions versus the list experiment among women in Ohio.俄亥俄州妇女直接调查问题与列表实验得出的堕胎发生率估计值比较。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0269476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269476. eCollection 2022.
9
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2019.《2019 年美国堕胎监测报告》。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2021 Nov 26;70(9):1-29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7009a1.
10
Estimating Prevalence of Abortion Using List Experiments: Findings from a Survey of Women in Delaware and Maryland.使用列表实验估计堕胎的流行率:来自特拉华州和马里兰州妇女调查的结果。
Womens Health Issues. 2022 Jan-Feb;32(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

当医疗补助计划涵盖堕胎护理时的终身堕胎发生率:马里兰州与五个对比州。

Lifetime abortion incidence when abortion care is covered by Medicaid: Maryland versus five comparison states.

机构信息

Maryland Population Research Center, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Maryland, USA.

Maryland Population Research Center and Department of Sociology, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;59(5):e14358. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14358. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14358
PMID:39009037
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11366969/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the association of Medicaid coverage of abortion care with cumulative lifetime abortion incidence among women insured by Medicaid.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

We use 2016-2019 (Pre-Dobbs) data from the Survey of Women studies that represent women aged 18-44 living in six U.S. states. One state, Maryland, has a Medicaid program that has long covered the cost of abortion care. The other five states, Alabama, Delaware, Iowa, Ohio, and South Carolina, have Medicaid programs that do not cover the cost of abortion care. Our sample includes 8972 women residing in the study states.

STUDY DESIGN

Our outcome, cumulative lifetime abortion incidence, is identified using an indirect survey method, the double list experiment. We use a multivariate regression of cumulative lifetime abortion on variables including whether women were Medicaid-insured and whether they were residing in Maryland versus in one of the other five states.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: This study used secondary survey data.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We estimate that Medicaid coverage of abortion care in Maryland is associated with a 37.0 percentage-point (95% CI: 12.3-61.4) higher cumulative lifetime abortion incidence among Medicaid-insured women relative to women not insured by Medicaid compared with those differences by insurance status in states whose Medicaid programs do not cover the cost of abortion care.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that Medicaid coverage of abortion care is associated with a much higher lifetime incidence of abortion among individuals insured by Medicaid. We infer that Medicaid coverage of abortion care costs may have a very large impact on the accessibility of abortion care for low-income women.

摘要

目的

评估医疗补助计划覆盖堕胎护理与接受医疗补助的女性累积终身堕胎发生率之间的关联。

数据来源和研究设置

我们使用了 2016 年至 2019 年(多布斯前)来自妇女调查研究的数据,这些数据代表了居住在美国六个州的 18-44 岁的女性。其中一个州,马里兰州,其医疗补助计划长期以来一直覆盖堕胎护理费用。其他五个州,阿拉巴马州、特拉华州、爱荷华州、俄亥俄州和南卡罗来纳州,其医疗补助计划不涵盖堕胎护理费用。我们的样本包括居住在研究州的 8972 名女性。

研究设计

我们的结果,即累积终身堕胎发生率,是通过间接调查方法,即双列表实验确定的。我们使用多元回归分析,将累积终身堕胎与包括女性是否接受医疗补助以及她们是否居住在马里兰州与其他五个州中的一个州相关的变量进行回归。

数据收集/提取方法:本研究使用了二手调查数据。

主要发现

我们估计,马里兰州的医疗补助计划覆盖堕胎护理与接受医疗补助的女性的累积终身堕胎发生率相比,其差异为 37.0 个百分点(95%置信区间:12.3-61.4),而在那些不覆盖堕胎护理费用的州,医疗补助计划对堕胎护理的覆盖与保险状况之间的差异要小得多。

结论

我们发现,医疗补助计划对堕胎护理的覆盖与接受医疗补助的个人堕胎终身发生率之间存在很强的关联。我们推断,医疗补助计划对堕胎护理费用的覆盖可能对低收入女性获得堕胎护理的可及性产生非常大的影响。