Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Surg Res. 2020 Dec;256:492-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.019. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
The impact that distance traveled to receive treatment has on treatments and outcomes among patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremity has yet to be thoroughly investigated.
Information on patients treated for STS of the extremity between 2006 and 2015 was obtained from the National Cancer Database. Patients were stratified into two groups based on median distance traveled to receive treatment. Chi-square tests assessed associations between categorical variables and distance to treatment. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox regression were used to estimate survival.
The sample included 21,763 patients. The mean age was 59.3 y, 54.6% were men, and 83.2% were white. The median distance traveled to the treating facility was 15.6 miles. Compared with patients who traveled <15 miles, those who traveled ≥15 miles were more likely to have undifferentiated rather than well-differentiated tumors (odds ratio [OR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.10-1.37), and stage II rather than stage I disease (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.24). They were also more likely to undergo limb-sparing resection (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.39-1.79) or amputation (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.44-2.07) rather than no surgery and less likely to have positive margins (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.93). There was no difference in the risk of death between patients who traveled ≥15 miles and those who did not (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.94-1.07).
Although clinical characteristics and treatments may differ based on distance traveled, survival appears equivalent. Further research into reasons why greater distance traveled is associated with more advanced disease, but comparable survival is warranted.
患者接受治疗的路程远近对软组织肉瘤(STS)患者的治疗效果和结局的影响尚未得到充分研究。
从国家癌症数据库获取了 2006 年至 2015 年间接受治疗的肢体软组织肉瘤患者的数据。根据到治疗机构的距离中位数将患者分为两组。卡方检验评估了分类变量与治疗距离之间的关系。采用 Kaplan-Meier 生存估计和 Cox 回归来估计生存。
样本包括 21763 名患者。患者的平均年龄为 59.3 岁,54.6%为男性,83.2%为白人。到治疗机构的平均距离为 15.6 英里。与行驶距离<15 英里的患者相比,行驶距离≥15 英里的患者更有可能患有未分化而非分化良好的肿瘤(比值比 [OR],1.23;95%置信区间 [95%CI],1.10-1.37)和 II 期而非 I 期疾病(OR,1.14;95%CI,1.04-1.24)。他们更有可能接受保肢切除术(OR,1.58;95%CI,1.39-1.79)或截肢术(OR,1.72;95%CI,1.44-2.07),而非不手术,并且更有可能出现切缘阳性(OR,0.86;95%CI,0.79-0.93)。行驶距离≥15 英里和未行驶的患者的死亡风险无差异(风险比,1.00;95%CI,0.94-1.07)。
尽管基于行驶距离,患者的临床特征和治疗方法可能有所不同,但生存情况似乎相同。需要进一步研究为什么行驶距离越远与更晚期的疾病相关,但生存情况相当的原因。