Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia.
Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia; Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Australia.
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Oct;263:113259. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113259. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
Recent research illuminates the characteristics of non-vaccinating parents in well-defined geographic communities, however the process by which they came to reject vaccines is less clearly understood. Between September 11th, 2017 and February 20th, 2019, we recruited a nationally derived sample of Australian parents of children under 18 years who rejected some or all vaccines for semi-structured interviews. We used various strategies, including advertising on national radio, in community centres and playgrounds in low coverage areas, and snowballing. Grounded Theory methodology guided data collection and analysis. Twenty-one parents from regional and urban locations were interviewed. All spoke of wanting happy, healthy, robust children. All endorsed parenting values and approaches aligned with modern societal expectations of taking responsibility for their child's health. They varied, however, in their lifestyle and vaccination trajectories. Participants self-identified as situated along an 'alternative' to 'mainstream' lifestyle spectrum and had moved both away from and toward vaccination over time. Some had decided before birth that they never would vaccinate their children and had not changed. Others stopped vaccinating after perceived post-vaccine reactions in their children. Still others initially rejected vaccines, but eventually accepted them. The variation and dynamic nature of the vaccination trajectories described in this study suggests that vaccine refusal is not a static trait but rather the result of ever-changing experience and continual risk assessment; not all non-vaccinating parents fit the 'alternative lifestyle' stereotype. This suggests that nuanced personalised engagement with non-vaccinating parents is more appropriate than a one-size-fits-all approach.
最近的研究揭示了在特定地理社区中拒绝接种疫苗的父母的特征,但他们拒绝接种疫苗的过程却不太清楚。在 2017 年 9 月 11 日至 2019 年 2 月 20 日期间,我们招募了来自澳大利亚的 18 岁以下儿童的父母,他们对某些或所有疫苗持拒绝态度,并对他们进行了半结构化访谈。我们使用了各种策略,包括在全国性广播、低覆盖率地区的社区中心和操场做广告,以及滚雪球。扎根理论方法指导了数据收集和分析。从区域和城市地点采访了 21 位家长。所有人都表示希望孩子快乐、健康、强壮。所有人都赞同育儿价值观和方法,与现代社会对孩子健康负责的期望一致。然而,他们在生活方式和接种轨迹上存在差异。参与者自认为处于“替代”主流生活方式的光谱上,并随着时间的推移,在远离和靠近疫苗接种方面都有所变化。有些人在孩子出生前就决定永远不会给孩子接种疫苗,而且没有改变。其他人则在孩子出现疫苗接种后反应后停止接种。还有一些人最初拒绝接种疫苗,但最终还是接受了。本研究描述的接种轨迹的变化和动态性质表明,疫苗拒绝不是一种静态特征,而是不断变化的经验和持续风险评估的结果;并非所有拒绝接种疫苗的父母都符合“替代生活方式”的刻板印象。这表明,与非接种父母进行细致入微的个性化接触比一刀切的方法更合适。