Teymourian Houman, Ghiasy Saleh, Tayebi-Azar Ali, Razzaghi Mohammadreza, Sadri Ghazal, Ansari Djafari Anahita, Hojjati Seyyed Ali, Poury Mohammad, Shahabi Vahid, Javanmard Babak
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Urology, Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University Of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Summer;11(3):305-309. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2020.51. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
Urinary stone disease is the third most common affliction of the urinary tract that has been associated with an increasing incidence. Over decades, great advances have been made in the minimally invasive treatment of urinary stones. Recently, transurethral lithotripsy (TUL) by holmium laser was introduced as a possible therapeutic option. This study evaluated the effect of propofol on the success rate of TUL by holmium laser. A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted on 180 patients to investigate the effect of propofol on the success and complication rate of TUL by holmium laser. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups: the first group received sodium thiopental (n=89) while the second group received propofol (n=91). The two groups were compared in terms of the fluctuations of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), operation time, future stone-free rate (SFR), stone migration, post-operative fever, and ureteral complications such as perforation and mucosal damage. Other developed complications were also recorded. After data gathering, statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 21. the patients' data such as age, sex, stone diameter, stone laterality, duration of stone impaction, primary SBP, DBP and HR were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). TUL and anesthesia duration, first-minute and fifth-minute SBP and DBP, and also changes of HR were significantly lower in the propofol group compared with the sodium thiopental group ( <0.001). Moreover, SFR of TUL was more evident in the propofol group. Ureteral mucosal damage was significantly less in the propofol group. Propofol was associated with a higher reduction in SBP and DBP, decreased duration of TUL, fewer fluctuations in HR, and an increased success rate of stone removal by TUL with holmium laser.
尿石症是泌尿系统第三常见的疾病,其发病率呈上升趋势。几十年来,尿石症的微创治疗取得了巨大进展。最近,钬激光经尿道碎石术(TUL)被引入作为一种可能的治疗选择。本研究评估了丙泊酚对钬激光TUL成功率的影响。对180例患者进行了一项双盲随机对照试验,以研究丙泊酚对钬激光TUL成功率和并发症发生率的影响。入选患者分为两组:第一组接受硫喷妥钠(n = 89),第二组接受丙泊酚(n = 91)。比较两组患者的收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、心率(HR)波动、手术时间、术后无石率(SFR)、结石移位、术后发热以及输尿管穿孔和黏膜损伤等并发症情况。还记录了其他发生的并发症。数据收集后,使用SPSS 21版进行统计分析。两组患者的年龄、性别、结石直径、结石位置、结石嵌顿时间、初始SBP、DBP和HR等数据无显著差异(P>0.05)。与硫喷妥钠组相比,丙泊酚组的TUL和麻醉时间、第1分钟和第5分钟的SBP和DBP以及HR变化显著更低(<0.001)。此外,丙泊酚组TUL的SFR更明显。丙泊酚组输尿管黏膜损伤明显更少。丙泊酚与SBP和DBP的更大降幅、TUL持续时间缩短、HR波动减少以及钬激光TUL结石清除成功率提高相关。