Rørtveit Kristine, Saetre Hansen Britt, Joa Inge, Lode Kirsten, Severinsson Elisabeth
Department of Research, Nursing and Healthcare Research Group Stavanger University Hospital Stavanger Norway.
Nurs Open. 2020 Jun 2;7(5):1285-1298. doi: 10.1002/nop2.519. eCollection 2020 Sep.
To identify and synthesize qualitative evaluation methods used in nursing interventions.
A systematic qualitative review with a content analysis. Four databases were used: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and CINAHL using pre-defined terms. The included papers were published from 2014-2018.
We followed the guidelines of Dixon-Woods et al., Sandelowski and Barroso, the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist and The Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research Approach.
Of 103 papers, 15 were eligible for inclusion. The main theme described processes and characteristics of qualitative evaluation. Two analytic themes emerged: Evaluating the implementation process and Evaluating improvements brought about by the programme.
Different qualitative evaluation methods in nursing are a way of documenting knowledge that is difficult to illuminate in natural settings and make an important contribution when determining the pros and cons of an intervention.
识别并综合护理干预中使用的定性评估方法。
采用内容分析法进行系统的定性综述。使用了四个数据库：MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Embase和CINAHL，检索词为预先设定的。纳入的论文发表于2014年至2018年。
我们遵循了迪克森 - 伍兹等人、桑德洛斯基和巴罗佐的指南、批判性评估技能计划定性检查表以及定性研究证据综述的可信度方法。
103篇论文中，15篇符合纳入标准。主要主题描述了定性评估的过程和特征。出现了两个分析主题：评估实施过程和评估该计划带来的改进。
护理中不同的定性评估方法是记录在自然环境中难以阐明的知识的一种方式，并且在确定干预措施的优缺点时做出了重要贡献。
