• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Nurses' perceptions of patient participation in the myocardial infarction pathway.护士对患者参与心肌梗死治疗路径的看法。
Nurs Open. 2020 Jun 15;7(5):1606-1615. doi: 10.1002/nop2.544. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
Patients' narratives of their patient participation in the myocardial infarction pathway.患者对其参与心肌梗死治疗路径的叙述。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 May;75(5):1063-1073. doi: 10.1111/jan.13931. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
3
Thai Oncology Nurses' Perceptions of Patient Participation in Acute Cancer Care.泰国肿瘤护理人员对患者参与急性癌症护理的看法。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2018 Sep;12(3):209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
4
Physicians' and nurses' perceptions of patient involvement in myocardial infarction care.医生和护士对患者参与心肌梗死护理的看法。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008 Jun;7(2):113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 Jun 19.
5
Nurses' views of patient participation in nursing care.护士对患者参与护理的看法。
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Dec;71(12):2741-52. doi: 10.1111/jan.12740. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
6
Intensive care unit nurses' perceptions of patient participation in the acute phase of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation: an interview study.重症监护病房护士对慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重期患者参与急性阶段的看法:一项访谈研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2013 Feb;69(2):425-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06021.x. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
7
Patient involvement climate: views and behaviours among registered nurses in myocardial infarction care.患者参与氛围:心肌梗死护理中注册护士的观点和行为
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Feb;24(3-4):475-85. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12629. Epub 2014 May 10.
8
Nurse perceptions of person-centered handovers in the oncological inpatient setting: A qualitative study.护士对肿瘤住院患者环境中以患者为中心的交接班的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Oct;86:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
9
Perceptions of patient participation in symptom management: A qualitative study with cancer patients, doctors, and nurses.患者对症状管理参与度的认知:一项癌症患者、医生和护士参与的定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Feb;75(2):412-422. doi: 10.1111/jan.13853. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
10
Nurses' Perceptions of Patient Participation in the Postanesthesia Care Unit-A Qualitative Focus Group Study.护士对患者在麻醉后护理单元参与情况的认知——一项定性焦点小组研究
J Perianesth Nurs. 2021 Dec;36(6):656-663. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2021.02.005. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation and Validation for the Portuguese Population of the Bedside Handover Attitudes and Behaviors Questionnaire.《床边交接班态度与行为问卷》葡萄牙语版本的翻译与验证
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Jan 17;18:185-203. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S482728. eCollection 2025.
2
Translation and psychometric validation of the Patient Participation Culture Tool for healthcare workers in Chinese nursing context.《患者参与文化工具》在中国护理背景下针对医护人员的翻译及心理测量学验证
BMC Nurs. 2024 Aug 15;23(1):565. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02065-x.
3
Nurses' perceptions of factors influencing treatment engagement among patients with cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review.护士对影响心血管疾病患者治疗参与度因素的认知:一项系统综述
BMC Nurs. 2021 Dec 20;20(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00765-2.
4
Individual nursing promotes rehabilitation of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with arrhythmia.个体化护理促进急性心肌梗死合并心律失常患者的康复。
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Aug 15;13(8):9306-9314. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Unsatisfactory risk factor control and high rate of new cardiovascular events in patients with myocardial infarction and prior coronary artery disease.心肌梗死和既往有冠状动脉疾病患者的危险因素控制不佳及新发心血管事件发生率高。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Mar 28;19(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1062-y.
2
Facilitating patient participation by embracing patients' preferences-A discussion.通过接受患者偏好促进患者参与——一场讨论
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1070-1073. doi: 10.1111/jep.13126. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
3
PREPARED Study: A Study of Shared Decision-Making for Coronary Artery Disease.PREPARED研究:一项关于冠状动脉疾病共同决策的研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Feb;12(2):e005244. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005244.
4
Patients' narratives of their patient participation in the myocardial infarction pathway.患者对其参与心肌梗死治疗路径的叙述。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 May;75(5):1063-1073. doi: 10.1111/jan.13931. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
5
Challenges adhering to a medication regimen following first-time percutaneous coronary intervention: A patient perspective.初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后坚持药物治疗方案的挑战:患者视角。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Dec;88:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
6
Cardiac rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention: Results from a nationwide survey.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的心脏康复:一项全国性调查结果
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Mar;17(3):273-279. doi: 10.1177/1474515117737766. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
7
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
8
Continuity of care after percutaneous coronary intervention: The patient's perspective across secondary and primary care settings.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的连续护理:患者在二级和初级护理环境中的观点。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017 Jun;16(5):444-452. doi: 10.1177/1474515117690298. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
9
Challenges in secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction: A call for action.急性心肌梗死后二级预防面临的挑战:行动呼吁。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Dec;23(18):1994-2006. doi: 10.1177/2047487316663873. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
10
Acute Myocardial Infarction, Use of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, and Mortality: A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis Covering Seven European Countries.急性心肌梗死、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的应用与死亡率:一项涵盖七个欧洲国家的比较效果分析
Health Econ. 2015 Dec;24 Suppl 2:88-101. doi: 10.1002/hec.3263.

护士对患者参与心肌梗死治疗路径的看法。

Nurses' perceptions of patient participation in the myocardial infarction pathway.

作者信息

Bårdsgjerde Elise Kvalsund, Landstad Bodil J, Hole Torstein, Nylenna Magne, Gjeilo Kari Hanne, Kvangarsnes Marit

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences in Ålesund Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology Ålesund Norway.

Department of Health Sciences Mid Sweden University Sundsvall and Östersund Sweden.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2020 Jun 15;7(5):1606-1615. doi: 10.1002/nop2.544. eCollection 2020 Sep.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.544
PMID:32802382
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7424437/
Abstract

AIM

To explore nurses' perceptions of patient participation in different phases of the myocardial infarction pathway.

DESIGN

Qualitative design with a hermeneutical approach.

METHODS

Five focus groups were conducted at two hospitals, one with and one without percutaneous coronary intervention facilities, between February-November 2018. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling. Twenty-two nurses experienced in cardiac care participated. The analysis had a hermeneutical approach.

RESULTS

The findings revealed nurses' perceptions of patient participation in different phases of the myocardial infarction pathway. Four themes were identified: (a) variation between paternalism and autonomy in the acute phase; (b) individualization of dialogue and patient participation during treatment; (c) lack of coherence in the pathway hinders patient participation at discharge; and (d) cardiac rehabilitation promotes patients' autonomous decisions in lifestyle changes.

摘要

目的

探讨护士对患者在心肌梗死治疗路径不同阶段参与情况的看法。

设计

采用诠释学方法的定性设计。

方法

2018年2月至11月期间,在两家医院进行了五次焦点小组讨论,其中一家有经皮冠状动脉介入治疗设施,另一家没有。通过目的抽样招募参与者。22名有心脏护理经验的护士参与其中。分析采用诠释学方法。

结果

研究结果揭示了护士对患者在心肌梗死治疗路径不同阶段参与情况的看法。确定了四个主题:(a)急性期家长式作风与自主性之间的差异;(b)治疗期间对话的个性化与患者参与;(c)治疗路径缺乏连贯性阻碍患者出院时的参与;(d)心脏康复促进患者在生活方式改变方面做出自主决定。