Gkioka Mara, Tsolaki Magdalini, Papagianopoulos Sotirios, Teichmann Birgit, Moraitou Despina
Network Aging Research University of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany.
School of Medicine Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Greece.
Nurs Open. 2020 Jul 3;7(5):1623-1633. doi: 10.1002/nop2.546. eCollection 2020 Sep.
Τo validate the Greek version of the Dementia Knowledge Assessment Tool 2, the Dementia Attitudes Scale and Confidence in Dementia Scale.
A quantitative cross-sectional design was applied for translation and validation. The STROBE checklist for observational research has been followed to this survey.
Two hundred and twelve students from the School of Psychology (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki). Psychometric properties were assessed through construct validity (principal component analysis), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and convergent validity.
High internal reliability was found for Confidence in Dementia Scale (α = 0.85), adequate reliability for Dementia Attitudes Scale (α = 0.74) and acceptable reliability for Dementia Knowledge Assessment Tool 2 (α = 0.68). Construct validity was satisfactory for Dementia Attitudes Scale (two factors: social comfort and knowledge). The convergent validity was supported to this survey. All three tools are reliable and valid to measure knowledge, confidence and attitudes towards dementia in Greek research context.
验证痴呆知识评估工具2的希腊语版本、痴呆态度量表和痴呆信心量表。
采用定量横断面设计进行翻译和验证。本次调查遵循了观察性研究的STROBE清单。
来自塞萨洛尼基亚里士多德大学心理学院的212名学生。通过结构效度（主成分分析）、内部一致性（克朗巴哈系数）和收敛效度评估心理测量特性。
痴呆信心量表具有较高的内部信度（α = 0.85），痴呆态度量表具有足够的信度（α = 0.74），痴呆知识评估工具2具有可接受的信度（α = 0.68）。痴呆态度量表的结构效度令人满意（两个因素：社会舒适度和知识）。本次调查支持收敛效度。在希腊研究背景下，所有这三种工具在测量对痴呆症的知识、信心和态度方面都是可靠且有效的。
