• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度尼西亚健康专业学生中痴呆症问卷调查方法(ADQ)的有效性和可靠性。

Validity and reliability of the Approaches to Dementia Questionnaire (ADQ) in Indonesian health students.

作者信息

Mulyani Sri, Mitchell Gary, Carter Gillian, Woods Bob, Warsini Sri, Saifullah Azam David, Ulayya Aisyah Iffah, Brown Wilson Christine

机构信息

Department of Mental Health and Community Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 29;25(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07332-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-07332-2
PMID:40442706
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individuals living with dementia often visit healthcare settings, so it is important for health professionals to have appropriate dementia care training. A key component of dementia care is a positive, person-centred attitude towards people with dementia. As future healthcare workers, health students need to develop positive attitudes early in their education. To assess and support the development of such attitudes, a brief, valid, and reliable tool is needed in Indonesia. However, no such tool is currently available in Indonesia. The Approaches to Dementia Questionnaire (ADQ) is a well-established instrument that measures care staff attitudes and has been shown to predict staff behaviour and the recognition of people with dementia. Therefore, this study aims to translate, adapt, and assess the validity and reliability of the Indonesian translation of the modified ADQ for use with health students.

METHODS

This methodological study was conducted from October to November 2023 to adapt the modified ADQ into Indonesian. The translation process followed established cross-cultural adaptation by Brislin guidelines, including translation, synthesis, expert review, and testing. Two translators from different language institutions translated the instrument into Indonesian (T1 & T2). These two versions were synthesised into an integrated version (T12) by a panel of experts. The final instrument was tested on 161 fourth-year nursing, medical, and health nutrition students recruited through consecutive sampling.

RESULTS

The Indonesian version of the ADQ demonstrated an overall internal consistency of 0.584 (Cronbach's alpha), which is considered acceptable. Subscale reliability was moderate for the Hope subscale (α = 0.552) and higher for the Personhood subscale (α = 0.701). Item-total correlation values ranged from 0.261 to 0.588, indicating moderate validity overall; however, three items (Items 1, 6, and 15) were identified as invalid with correlation coefficients below 0.195.

CONCLUSION

The Indonesian version of the ADQ demonstrated lower reliability and variable subscale consistency compared to adaptations in other countries. This may be due to limited public awareness and associated stigma towards dementia. These findings highlight the need for further refinement of item wording and better alignment with local contexts, to improve the tool's validity and reliability for use in different populations.

摘要

背景

痴呆症患者经常前往医疗机构就诊,因此医护人员接受适当的痴呆症护理培训非常重要。痴呆症护理的一个关键要素是对痴呆症患者持积极的、以人为本的态度。作为未来的医护人员,医学生需要在其教育早期就培养积极的态度。为了评估和支持这种态度的发展,印度尼西亚需要一种简短、有效且可靠的工具。然而,印度尼西亚目前尚无此类工具。痴呆症护理方法问卷(ADQ)是一种成熟的工具,用于测量护理人员的态度,并已被证明能够预测护理人员的行为以及对痴呆症患者的认知。因此,本研究旨在翻译、改编并评估修改后的ADQ印尼语版本用于医学生的有效性和可靠性。

方法

本方法学研究于2023年10月至11月进行,旨在将修改后的ADQ改编为印尼语版本。翻译过程遵循Brislin指南确定的跨文化改编方法,包括翻译、综合、专家评审和测试。来自不同语言机构的两名翻译人员将该工具翻译成印尼语(T1和T2)。这两个版本由一组专家综合成一个整合版本(T12)。最终工具在通过连续抽样招募的161名四年级护理、医学和健康营养专业学生中进行了测试。

结果

ADQ的印尼语版本总体内部一致性为0.584(克朗巴哈系数),被认为是可以接受的。希望子量表的信度适中(α = 0.552),人格子量表的信度较高(α = 0.701)。项目与总分的相关值范围为0.261至0.588,总体有效性适中;然而,有三个项目(项目1、6和15)被确定为无效,相关系数低于0.195。

结论

与其他国家改编的版本相比,ADQ的印尼语版本信度较低,子量表一致性也有所不同。这可能是由于公众对痴呆症的认识有限以及相关的污名化。这些发现凸显了进一步完善项目措辞并更好地与当地情况相契合的必要性,以提高该工具在不同人群中使用的有效性和可靠性。

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Approaches to Dementia Questionnaire (ADQ) in Indonesian health students.印度尼西亚健康专业学生中痴呆症问卷调查方法(ADQ)的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 29;25(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07332-2.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the Indonesian version of the Person-centered Care Assessment Tool.以患者为中心的护理评估工具印尼语版本的心理测量学评估
Int J Older People Nurs. 2023 Nov;18(6):e12565. doi: 10.1111/opn.12565. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
3
Validity and reliability of the loco-check questionnaire after cross-cultural adaptation for Indonesia.针对印度尼西亚进行跨文化适应后,Loco-check问卷的有效性和可靠性。
J Orthop Sci. 2023 Jan;28(1):267-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
4
The Indonesian Version of the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale: Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Testing.《锻炼自我效能感量表印尼文版:跨文化调适与心理计量学测试》
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 Dec;14(5):300-305. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
5
Assessing the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Scale v1.2.评估印度尼西亚语版患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)全球健康量表v1.2的有效性和可靠性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Jan 31;23(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02336-4.
6
Cultural adaptation and validation of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children (PANAS-C) among Indonesian adolescents.文化适应和验证儿童正负情绪量表(PANAS-C)在印度尼西亚青少年中的应用。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 28;12(1):703. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02209-3.
7
Validation of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in an Indonesian population: a scale adaptation study.医院焦虑和抑郁量表在印度尼西亚人群中的验证:量表适应性研究。
Fam Med Community Health. 2023 Jun;11(2). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2022-001775.
8
The Chinese Version of the DigiHealthCom (Digital Health Competence) Instrument for Assessing Digital Health Competence of Health Care Professionals: Translation, Adaptation, and Validation Study.用于评估医疗保健专业人员数字健康能力的DigiHealthCom(数字健康能力)工具中文版:翻译、改编与验证研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 21;12:e65373. doi: 10.2196/65373.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-centred Climate Questionnaire - Staff version (PCQ-S).以患者为中心的气候问卷中文版——员工版(PCQ-S)的心理测量学评估。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 28;7(8):e017250. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017250.
10
Translation and Validation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire in Indonesian Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.《2 型糖尿病印度尼西亚患者糖尿病知识问卷的翻译及验证》
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2024 Dec;50(6):484-496. doi: 10.1177/26350106241287445. Epub 2024 Oct 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Dementia knowledge of family caregivers in Indonesia: A cross-sectional survey study.印度尼西亚家庭照顾者的痴呆症知识:一项横断面调查研究。
Belitung Nurs J. 2024 Oct 14;10(5):523-530. doi: 10.33546/bnj.3457. eCollection 2024.
2
Dementia diagnostic and treatment services in the Western Pacific: challenges, preparedness and opportunities in the face of amyloid-targeting therapies.西太平洋地区的痴呆症诊断与治疗服务:面对针对淀粉样蛋白疗法的挑战、准备情况与机遇
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 Sep 16;50:101183. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101183. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Identifying Gaps and Barriers in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia Research and Management in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Survey of Health Professionals and Researchers.
识别中低收入国家阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症研究和管理中的差距和障碍:对卫生专业人员和研究人员的调查。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;101(4):1307-1320. doi: 10.3233/JAD-240650.
4
Nursing students' perceptions and attitudes towards dementia care in Namibia.纳米比亚护理专业学生对痴呆症护理的认知与态度。
Health SA. 2024 Aug 20;29:2692. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2692. eCollection 2024.
5
Evaluation of a dementia awareness game for health professions students in Northern Ireland: a pre-/post-test study.评估北爱尔兰卫生专业学生的痴呆症意识游戏:一项前后测试研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jun 18;24(1):677. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05656-z.
6
Awareness, attitudes, and beliefs of dementia in Indonesia.印度尼西亚对痴呆症的认知、态度和信念。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2024 Apr 12;16(2):e12570. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12570. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
7
The Mediating Role of Attitudes Towards Dementia on the Relationship Between Dementia Knowledge and Behaviors Towards Persons with Dementia: A Cross-Sectional Study.痴呆症态度在痴呆症知识与痴呆症患者行为关系中的中介作用:一项横断面研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Dec 23;16:4213-4225. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S443189. eCollection 2023.
8
Construct validity, floor and ceiling effects, data completeness and magnitude of change for the eight-item HAKIR questionnaire: a patient-reported outcome in the Swedish National Healthcare Quality Registry for hand surgery.八项HAKIR问卷的结构效度、地板效应和天花板效应、数据完整性及变化幅度:瑞典国家手外科医疗质量登记处的一项患者报告结局
Hand Ther. 2021 Mar;26(1):3-16. doi: 10.1177/1758998320966018. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
9
Establishing appropriate sample size for developing and validating a questionnaire in nursing research.在护理研究中确定用于开发和验证问卷的合适样本量。
Belitung Nurs J. 2021 Oct 28;7(5):356-360. doi: 10.33546/bnj.1927. eCollection 2021.
10
Evaluation of a dementia awareness game for undergraduate nursing students in Northern Ireland: a Pre-/Post-Test study.北爱尔兰本科护理专业学生痴呆症认知游戏评估:一项前后测研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 May 22;22(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01345-2.