Ruiz-Mercado Gerardo J, Carvalho Ana, Cabezas Heriberto
National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, United States.
CEG-IST, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, no. 1, Lisboa 1049-001, Portugal.
ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2016 Nov 7;4(11):6208-6221. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02200.
The concepts of green chemistry and engineering (GC&E) have been promoted as an effective qualitative framework for developing more sustainable chemical syntheses, processes, and material management techniques. This has been demonstrated by many theoretical and practical cases. In addition, there are several approaches and frameworks focused on demonstrating that improvements were achieved through GC&E technologies. However, the application of these principles is not always straightforward. We propose using systematic frameworks and tools that help practitioners when deciding which principles can be applied, the levels of implementation, prospective of obtaining simultaneous improvements in all sustainability aspects, and ways to deal with multiobjective problems. Therefore, this contribution aims to provide a systematic combination of three different and complementary design tools for assisting designers in evaluating, developing, and improving chemical manufacturing and materials management systems under GC&E perspectives. The WAR Algorithm, GREENSCOPE, and SustainPro were employed for this synergistic approach of incorporating sustainability at early stages of process development. In this demonstration, simulated ammonia production is used as a case study to illustrate this advancement. Results show how to identify process design areas for improvements, key factors, multicriteria decision-making solutions, and optimal trade-offs. Finally, conclusions were presented regarding the tools' use in more robust sustainable process and material management designs.
绿色化学与工程(GC&E)的概念已被推广为一种有效的定性框架,用于开发更具可持续性的化学合成、工艺和材料管理技术。许多理论和实际案例都证明了这一点。此外,有几种方法和框架专注于证明通过GC&E技术实现了改进。然而,这些原则的应用并不总是简单直接的。我们建议使用系统的框架和工具,在从业者决定可应用哪些原则、实施水平、在所有可持续性方面同时取得改进的前景以及处理多目标问题的方法时提供帮助。因此,本论文旨在提供三种不同且互补的设计工具的系统组合,以协助设计师在GC&E视角下评估、开发和改进化学制造与材料管理系统。WAR算法、GREENSCOPE和SustainPro被用于这种在工艺开发早期阶段纳入可持续性的协同方法。在本演示中,模拟氨生产被用作案例研究来说明这一进展。结果展示了如何识别有待改进的工艺设计领域、关键因素、多标准决策解决方案以及最佳权衡。最后,给出了关于这些工具在更稳健的可持续工艺和材料管理设计中的使用结论。