• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using Green Chemistry and Engineering Principles To Design, Assess, and Retrofit Chemical Processes for Sustainability.运用绿色化学与工程原理设计、评估和改造化学工艺以实现可持续发展。
ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2016 Nov 7;4(11):6208-6221. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02200.
2
Optimization of multi-pathway production chains and multi-criteria decision-making through sustainability evaluation: a biojet fuel production case study.通过可持续性评估优化多途径生产链和多标准决策:生物喷气燃料生产案例研究
Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2018;20(7):1697-1719. doi: 10.1007/s10098-018-1576-5.
3
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
4
Assessing the sustainability of advanced materials using multicriteria decision analysis and the triple bottom line.使用多准则决策分析和三重底线评估先进材料的可持续性。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2019 Nov;15(6):1021-1028. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4205. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
5
Principles and perspectives.原则与观点。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2004;11(5):284-90. doi: 10.1007/BF02979640.
6
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
7
Digital technologies, sustainability, and work: How can these themes be brought together to promote a human-centered future in industry 5.0 implementation?数字技术、可持续性与工作:如何将这些主题结合起来,以在工业5.0实施中推动以人为本的未来?
Appl Ergon. 2025 May;125:104475. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104475. Epub 2025 Feb 16.
8
No perfect tools: trade-offs of sustainability principles and user requirements in designing support tools for land-use decisions between greenfields and brownfields.没有完美的工具:在设计绿地和棕地之间土地利用决策支持工具时,可持续性原则和用户需求之间的权衡。
J Environ Manage. 2015 Apr 15;153:11-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.040. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
9
A Visualization and Control Strategy for Dynamic Minimization of Chemical Process Releases.一种用于动态最小化化学过程排放的可视化与控制策略。
Processes (Basel). 2020 Mar 7;8(3):310. doi: 10.3390/pr8030310.
10
Assisting decision-makers select multi-dimensionally efficient infrastructure designs - Application to urban drainage systems.协助决策者选择多维高效的基础设施设计——应用于城市排水系统。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jun 15;336:117689. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117689. Epub 2023 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances and opportunities in integrating economic and environmental performance of renewable products.可再生产品经济与环境绩效整合的进展与机遇。
Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2022 Dec 22;15(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13068-022-02239-2.
2
Sustainable Design Approach for Modeling Bioprocesses from Laboratory toward Commercialization: Optimizing Chitosan Production.从实验室到商业化的生物过程建模的可持续设计方法:优化壳聚糖生产
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Dec 22;14(1):25. doi: 10.3390/polym14010025.
3
Comparison of Biobutanol Production Pathways via Acetone-Butanol-Ethanol Fermentation Using a Sustainability Exergy-Based Metric.基于可持续性可用能指标对丙酮-丁醇-乙醇发酵生产生物丁醇途径的比较。
ACS Omega. 2020 Jul 21;5(30):18710-18730. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01656. eCollection 2020 Aug 4.
4
Application of Techno-economic and Sensitivity Analyses as Decision-Making Tools for Assessing Emerging Large-Scale Technologies for Production of Chitosan-Based Adsorbents.技术经济分析与敏感性分析作为决策工具在评估基于壳聚糖的吸附剂新兴大规模生产技术中的应用
ACS Omega. 2020 Jul 10;5(28):17601-17610. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c02064. eCollection 2020 Jul 21.
5
Applying Environmental Release Inventories and Indicators to the Evaluation of Chemical Manufacturing Processes in Early Stage Development.应用环境排放清单和指标评估早期开发阶段的化学制造工艺
ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2019;7(12):10937-10950. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01961.

本文引用的文献

1
Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment, Part I: a critical review.计入生命周期评价的生态系统服务,第一部分:批判性回顾。
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Apr 1;44(7):2232-42. doi: 10.1021/es9021156.
2
Design through the 12 principles of green engineering.通过绿色工程的12条原则进行设计。
Environ Sci Technol. 2003 Mar 1;37(5):94A-101A. doi: 10.1021/es032373g.

运用绿色化学与工程原理设计、评估和改造化学工艺以实现可持续发展。

Using Green Chemistry and Engineering Principles To Design, Assess, and Retrofit Chemical Processes for Sustainability.

作者信息

Ruiz-Mercado Gerardo J, Carvalho Ana, Cabezas Heriberto

机构信息

National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, United States.

CEG-IST, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, no. 1, Lisboa 1049-001, Portugal.

出版信息

ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2016 Nov 7;4(11):6208-6221. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02200.

DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02200
PMID:32802597
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7425743/
Abstract

The concepts of green chemistry and engineering (GC&E) have been promoted as an effective qualitative framework for developing more sustainable chemical syntheses, processes, and material management techniques. This has been demonstrated by many theoretical and practical cases. In addition, there are several approaches and frameworks focused on demonstrating that improvements were achieved through GC&E technologies. However, the application of these principles is not always straightforward. We propose using systematic frameworks and tools that help practitioners when deciding which principles can be applied, the levels of implementation, prospective of obtaining simultaneous improvements in all sustainability aspects, and ways to deal with multiobjective problems. Therefore, this contribution aims to provide a systematic combination of three different and complementary design tools for assisting designers in evaluating, developing, and improving chemical manufacturing and materials management systems under GC&E perspectives. The WAR Algorithm, GREENSCOPE, and SustainPro were employed for this synergistic approach of incorporating sustainability at early stages of process development. In this demonstration, simulated ammonia production is used as a case study to illustrate this advancement. Results show how to identify process design areas for improvements, key factors, multicriteria decision-making solutions, and optimal trade-offs. Finally, conclusions were presented regarding the tools' use in more robust sustainable process and material management designs.

摘要

绿色化学与工程(GC&E)的概念已被推广为一种有效的定性框架,用于开发更具可持续性的化学合成、工艺和材料管理技术。许多理论和实际案例都证明了这一点。此外,有几种方法和框架专注于证明通过GC&E技术实现了改进。然而,这些原则的应用并不总是简单直接的。我们建议使用系统的框架和工具,在从业者决定可应用哪些原则、实施水平、在所有可持续性方面同时取得改进的前景以及处理多目标问题的方法时提供帮助。因此,本论文旨在提供三种不同且互补的设计工具的系统组合,以协助设计师在GC&E视角下评估、开发和改进化学制造与材料管理系统。WAR算法、GREENSCOPE和SustainPro被用于这种在工艺开发早期阶段纳入可持续性的协同方法。在本演示中,模拟氨生产被用作案例研究来说明这一进展。结果展示了如何识别有待改进的工艺设计领域、关键因素、多标准决策解决方案以及最佳权衡。最后,给出了关于这些工具在更稳健的可持续工艺和材料管理设计中的使用结论。