• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

市民对城市滨水空间的偏好和态度:以钱塘江边开发为例。

Citizens' preferences and attitudes towards urban waterfront spaces: a case study of Qiantang riverside development.

机构信息

Department of Architecture, KeYi College of Zhe Jiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, 312369, China.

Faculty of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu, 808-0135, Japan.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Dec;27(36):45787-45801. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10419-6. Epub 2020 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-10419-6
PMID:32803586
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7429094/
Abstract

Many cities are facing various environmental problems, where performance-based planning and nature-based solutions have been proposed to address such problems. As a natural landscape in the city, urban waterfront space has efficient ecological benefits, high-quality landscape vision and environment, and it is an important carrier of citizens' activities. However, existing studies have mainly focused on coping with environmental problems, while social functions and strategies have been neglected. Therefore, this study aims to fill such research gaps by understanding the social performance of urban waterfront spaces. Field observation and questionnaire survey were conducted in a famous urban waterfront space, Qiantang riverside walkway, in Hangzhou, China. The results indicate that the Qiantang riverside walkway serves as a space for tourism, leisure and entertainment, as the visitors who lived more than 5 km away from here accounted for about 50% and the local people also accounted for about 50%. People's activities exhibited significantly temporal differences, where the occupation of the Qiantang riverside walkway reached a peak at night. For the people who lived far from here, they mainly depended on self-driving, which led to two critical problems relevant to transport linkage with the city and parking lot. Results also indicate that the landscape, supporting facilities and road functions could perform well among the mind of 102 respondents. However, public service and main facilities should be improved to meet more people's requirements. Moreover, importantly, the results indicate the phenomenon of stratification and agglomeration so that the similar aspects (e.g. rest seat quantity, rest seat style) could be merged into the same cluster (e.g. rest seat) for consideration in the urban waterfront space planning and design. This study also generates some implications for the renovation of urban waterfront spaces. Overall, this study provides people with basic understanding of the social performance of existing urban waterfront spaces, which can further promote urban planners and designers to comprehensively build sustainable, resilient and healthy water-based living environments.

摘要

许多城市都面临着各种环境问题,因此提出了基于绩效的规划和基于自然的解决方案来解决这些问题。作为城市中的自然景观,城市滨水空间具有高效的生态效益、高质量的景观视野和环境,是市民活动的重要载体。然而,现有研究主要集中在应对环境问题上,而忽视了社会功能和策略。因此,本研究旨在通过了解城市滨水空间的社会绩效来填补这一研究空白。本研究在中国杭州著名的城市滨水空间——钱塘江边步道进行了实地观察和问卷调查。结果表明,钱塘江边步道是一个旅游、休闲和娱乐的空间,因为居住在 5 公里以外的游客约占 50%,当地居民也占 50%左右。人们的活动呈现出明显的时间差异,钱塘江边步道的使用率在夜间达到高峰。对于那些居住在远离这里的人来说,他们主要依靠自驾出行,这导致了与城市交通联系和停车场相关的两个关键问题。研究结果还表明,景观、配套设施和道路功能在 102 位受访者的心目中表现良好。然而,公共服务和主要设施需要改进,以满足更多人的需求。此外,重要的是,研究结果表明了分层和集聚的现象,因此类似的方面(如休息座位数量、休息座位风格)可以合并到同一聚类(如休息座位)中,以便在城市滨水空间规划和设计中进行考虑。本研究还为城市滨水空间的改造提供了一些启示。总的来说,本研究为人们提供了对现有城市滨水空间社会绩效的基本了解,这可以进一步促进城市规划师和设计师全面建设可持续、有弹性和健康的滨水生活环境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/28ba8614a9ec/11356_2020_10419_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/ebc24b0d2f16/11356_2020_10419_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/5decd3cd11d4/11356_2020_10419_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/dd70141f6adc/11356_2020_10419_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/9fe0d380993a/11356_2020_10419_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/25ac2d51db8c/11356_2020_10419_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/41bfef62bbfe/11356_2020_10419_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/2f21ec963e90/11356_2020_10419_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/968ed40364d5/11356_2020_10419_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/b2a2ebb60a92/11356_2020_10419_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/28ba8614a9ec/11356_2020_10419_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/ebc24b0d2f16/11356_2020_10419_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/5decd3cd11d4/11356_2020_10419_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/dd70141f6adc/11356_2020_10419_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/9fe0d380993a/11356_2020_10419_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/25ac2d51db8c/11356_2020_10419_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/41bfef62bbfe/11356_2020_10419_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/2f21ec963e90/11356_2020_10419_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/968ed40364d5/11356_2020_10419_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/b2a2ebb60a92/11356_2020_10419_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/7429094/28ba8614a9ec/11356_2020_10419_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Citizens' preferences and attitudes towards urban waterfront spaces: a case study of Qiantang riverside development.市民对城市滨水空间的偏好和态度:以钱塘江边开发为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Dec;27(36):45787-45801. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10419-6. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
2
Landscape Aesthetic Value of Waterfront Green Space Based on Space-Psychology-Behavior Dimension: A Case Study along Qiantang River (Hangzhou Section).基于空间-心理-行为维度的滨水绿地景观美学价值:以钱塘江(杭州段)为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 10;20(4):3115. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043115.
3
[The possibility of fulfilling the needs of senior individuals through the activation of waterfront areas using mobile architectural-urban elements].[通过使用移动建筑-城市元素激活滨水区来满足老年人需求的可能性]
Med Pr. 2024 Jul 25;75(3):211-222. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.01519. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
4
How Do Ecological and Recreational Features of Waterfront Space Affect Its Vitality? Developing Coupling Coordination and Enhancing Waterfront Vitality. waterfront 空间的生态和娱乐特征如何影响其活力?发展耦合协调,提升 waterfront 活力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;20(2):1196. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021196.
5
Bridging the gap: Public engagement in blue-green space development for healthier urban futures.弥合差距:公众参与蓝绿空间开发,共创更健康的城市未来。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;360:121173. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121173. Epub 2024 May 19.
6
Restorative effect of audio and visual elements in urban waterfront spaces.城市滨水空间中视听元素的修复作用
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 6;14:1113134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1113134. eCollection 2023.
7
Analysis and optimization of 15-minute community life circle based on supply and demand matching: A case study of Shanghai.基于供需匹配的 15 分钟社区生活圈分析与优化——以上海为例。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 31;16(8):e0256904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256904. eCollection 2021.
8
Perception and attitude of residents toward urban green spaces in Guangzhou (China).中国广州居民对城市绿地的认知与态度
Environ Manage. 2006 Sep;38(3):338-49. doi: 10.1007/s00267-005-0166-6.
9
Assessing public aesthetic preferences towards some urban landscape patterns: the case study of two different geographic groups.评估公众对某些城市景观格局的审美偏好:以两个不同地理群体为例的研究。
Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Jan;188(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-5007-3. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
10
The Role of Urban Morphology Design on Enhancing Physical Activity and Public Health.城市形态设计在促进身体活动和公共健康方面的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 31;17(7):2359. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072359.

引用本文的文献

1
Landscape Aesthetic Value of Waterfront Green Space Based on Space-Psychology-Behavior Dimension: A Case Study along Qiantang River (Hangzhou Section).基于空间-心理-行为维度的滨水绿地景观美学价值:以钱塘江(杭州段)为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 10;20(4):3115. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043115.
2
How Do Ecological and Recreational Features of Waterfront Space Affect Its Vitality? Developing Coupling Coordination and Enhancing Waterfront Vitality. waterfront 空间的生态和娱乐特征如何影响其活力?发展耦合协调,提升 waterfront 活力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;20(2):1196. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021196.