Suppr超能文献

巨细胞动脉炎的症状、体征和实验室检查的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Diagnostic Accuracy of Symptoms, Physical Signs, and Laboratory Tests for Giant Cell Arteritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, NIHR (National Institute for Health Research) Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS (National Health Service) Trust, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1295-1304. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3050.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Current clinical guidelines recommend selecting diagnostic tests for giant cell arteritis (GCA) based on pretest probability that the disease is present, but how pretest probability should be estimated remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms, physical signs, and laboratory tests for suspected GCA.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from November 1940 through April 5, 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Trials and observational studies describing patients with suspected GCA, using an appropriate reference standard for GCA (temporal artery biopsy, imaging test, or clinical diagnosis), and with available data for at least 1 symptom, physical sign, or laboratory test.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Screening, full text review, quality assessment, and data extraction by 2 investigators. Diagnostic test meta-analysis used a bivariate model.

MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURES: Diagnostic accuracy parameters, including positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs).

RESULTS

In 68 unique studies (14 037 unique patients with suspected GCA; of 7798 patients with sex reported, 5193 were women [66.6%]), findings associated with a diagnosis of GCA included limb claudication (positive LR, 6.01; 95% CI, 1.38-26.16), jaw claudication (positive LR, 4.90; 95% CI, 3.74-6.41), temporal artery thickening (positive LR, 4.70; 95% CI, 2.65-8.33), temporal artery loss of pulse (positive LR, 3.25; 95% CI, 2.49-4.23), platelet count of greater than 400 × 103/μL (positive LR, 3.75; 95% CI, 2.12-6.64), temporal tenderness (positive LR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.14-8.65), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate greater than 100 mm/h (positive LR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.43-6.78). Findings that were associated with absence of GCA included the absence of erythrocyte sedimentation rate of greater than 40 mm/h (negative LR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.08-0.44), absence of C-reactive protein level of 2.5 mg/dL or more (negative LR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25-0.59), and absence of age over 70 years (negative LR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27-0.86).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study identifies the clinical and laboratory features that are most informative for a diagnosis of GCA, although no single feature was strong enough to confirm or refute the diagnosis if taken alone. Combinations of these symptoms might help direct further investigation, such as vascular imaging, temporal artery biopsy, or seeking evaluation for alternative diagnoses.

摘要

重要性

目前的临床指南建议根据疾病存在的先验概率选择用于巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)的诊断测试,但如何估计先验概率仍不清楚。

目的

评估疑似 GCA 的症状、体征和实验室检查的诊断准确性。

数据来源

从 1940 年 11 月至 2020 年 4 月 5 日,检索了 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库。

研究选择

描述疑似 GCA 患者的试验和观察性研究,使用适当的 GCA 参考标准(颞动脉活检、影像学检查或临床诊断),并具有至少 1 种症状、体征或实验室检查的可用数据。

数据提取和综合

由 2 名研究人员进行筛选、全文审查、质量评估和数据提取。使用双变量模型进行诊断测试荟萃分析。

主要结果和措施

诊断准确性参数,包括阳性和阴性似然比(LR)。

结果

在 68 项独特的研究中(14037 名疑似 GCA 患者;在报告性别为 7798 名患者中,5193 名为女性[66.6%]),与 GCA 诊断相关的发现包括四肢跛行(阳性 LR,6.01;95%CI,1.38-26.16)、下颌跛行(阳性 LR,4.90;95%CI,3.74-6.41)、颞动脉增厚(阳性 LR,4.70;95%CI,2.65-8.33)、颞动脉搏动丧失(阳性 LR,3.25;95%CI,2.49-4.23)、血小板计数大于 400×103/μL(阳性 LR,3.75;95%CI,2.12-6.64)、颞部压痛(阳性 LR,3.14;95%CI,1.14-8.65)和红细胞沉降率大于 100mm/h(阳性 LR,3.11;95%CI,1.43-6.78)。与不存在 GCA 相关的发现包括不存在红细胞沉降率大于 40mm/h(阴性 LR,0.18;95%CI,0.08-0.44)、不存在 C 反应蛋白水平为 2.5mg/dL 或更高(阴性 LR,0.38;95%CI,0.25-0.59)和不存在年龄大于 70 岁(阴性 LR,0.48;95%CI,0.27-0.86)。

结论和相关性

本研究确定了最有助于 GCA 诊断的临床和实验室特征,但没有任何单一特征足以单独确认或排除诊断。这些症状的组合可能有助于指导进一步的检查,如血管成像、颞动脉活检或寻求替代诊断的评估。

相似文献

7
Does this patient have temporal arteritis?这位患者患有颞动脉炎吗?
JAMA. 2002 Jan 2;287(1):92-101. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.1.92.

引用本文的文献

5
Anti-endothelial cell antibodies in pathogenesis of vasculitis.抗内皮细胞抗体在血管炎发病机制中的作用
Front Immunol. 2025 Apr 30;16:1567293. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1567293. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

2
What can negative temporal artery biopsies tell us?颞动脉活检阴性能告诉我们什么?
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 May 1;59(5):925-927. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez628.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验