*University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH; †Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and ‡Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA.
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Mar;28(3):e49-55. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182a5a045.
Hip fractures are common, morbid, and costly health events that threaten independence and function of older patients. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine if orthogeriatric collaboration models improve outcomes.
Articles in English and Spanish languages were searched in the electronic databases including MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Registry from 1992 to 2012.
Studies were included if they described an inpatient multidisciplinary approach to hip fracture management involving an orthopaedic surgeon and a geriatrician. Studies were grouped into 3 following categories: routine geriatric consultation, geriatric ward with orthopaedic consultation, and shared care. After independent review of 1480 citations by 2 authors, 18 studies (9094 patients) were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria.
In-hospital mortality, length of stay, and long-term mortality outcomes were collected.
A random effects model meta-analysis determined whether orthogeriatric collaboration was associated with improved outcomes. The overall meta-analysis found that orthogeriatric collaboration was associated with a significant reduction of in-hospital mortality [relative risk 0.60; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.43-0.84) and long-term mortality (relative risk 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94). Length of stay (standardized mean difference -0.25; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.05) was significantly reduced, particularly in the shared care model (standardized mean difference -0.61; 95% CI, -0.95 to -0.28), but heterogeneity limited this interpretation. Other variables such as time to surgery, delirium, and functional status were measured infrequently.
This meta-analysis supports orthogeriatric collaboration to improve mortality after hip repair. Further study is needed to determine the best model of orthogeriatric collaboration and if these partnerships improve functional outcomes.
髋部骨折是常见的、严重的且耗费巨大的健康事件,会威胁老年患者的独立性和身体机能。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是确定矫形外科与老年医学协作模式是否能改善预后。
检索了从 1992 年至 2012 年在电子数据库中发表的英文和西班牙文文献,包括 MEDLINE、护理学及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 注册中心。
如果研究描述了涉及矫形外科医生和老年病医生的髋部骨折管理多学科方法,则将其纳入研究。研究分为以下 3 类:常规老年医学咨询、配备矫形外科咨询的老年病房和共同护理。2 位作者独立审查了 1480 条引文后,确定了 18 项符合纳入标准的研究(9094 例患者)。
收集了院内死亡率、住院时间和长期死亡率的结果。
采用随机效应模型荟萃分析确定矫形外科与老年医学协作是否与改善预后相关。总体荟萃分析发现,矫形外科与老年医学协作显著降低了院内死亡率[相对风险 0.60;95%置信区间(95%CI),0.43-0.84]和长期死亡率(相对风险 0.83;95%CI,0.74-0.94)。住院时间(标准化均数差值-0.25;95%CI,-0.44 至-0.05)显著缩短,特别是在共同护理模式中(标准化均数差值-0.61;95%CI,-0.95 至-0.28),但异质性限制了这一解释。其他变量,如手术时间、谵妄和功能状态,测量频率较低。
荟萃分析支持矫形外科与老年医学协作可改善髋部修复术后的死亡率。需要进一步研究以确定最佳的矫形外科与老年医学协作模式,以及这些合作关系是否能改善功能结局。