Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (Dr Forman), Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System (Drs Lutz and Forman and Mss Delligatti and Allsup), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Drs Lutz and Forman); Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (Dr Afilalo); and University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Forman).
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2020 Sep;40(5):310-318. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000537.
Frailty is highly prevalent among older adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and is associated with greater than 2-fold risk for morbidity and mortality, independent of age and comorbidities. Many candidates are not referred to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) under the assumption that they are too frail to benefit. We hypothesized that CR is associated with similar benefits for frail adults as for intermediate-frail and nonfrail adults.
Retrospective analysis of CVD patients who completed a phase II CR program. Patients classified as frail by meeting ≥2 frailty criteria and intermediate-frail by meeting 1 criterion, including 6-min walk distance (6MWD) <300 m, gait speed ≤0.65 m/sec or 0.76 m/sec normalized to height and sex, tandem stand <10 sec, Timed Up & Go (TUG) <15 sec, and weak hand grip strength per Fried criteria. Changes within and between groups were compared before and after completion of CR.
We evaluated 243 patients; 75 were classified as frail, 70 as intermediate-frail, and 98 as nonfrail. Each group improved in all measures of frailty except for tandem stand. There were no significant differences in pre- to post-CR measures for 6MWD, gait speed, tandem stand, or hand grip strength between groups. Frail patients showed greater improvement in TUG than the other groups (P = .007).
Among frail patients, CR was associated with improvements in multiple domains of physical function. Gains achieved by frail adults were similar to or greater than those achieved by intermediate-frail and nonfrail patients. These data provide strong rationale for referring all eligible patients to CR, including frail patients. Those who are most physically impaired may derive gains that have proportionally greater ramifications.
虚弱在患有心血管疾病(CVD)的老年人中非常普遍,与发病率和死亡率增加超过两倍相关,独立于年龄和合并症。许多候选人没有被转介到心脏康复(CR),因为他们被认为太虚弱而无法受益。我们假设 CR 对虚弱成年人的益处与对中等虚弱和非虚弱成年人的益处相似。
对完成 II 期 CR 计划的 CVD 患者进行回顾性分析。符合≥2 项虚弱标准的患者被归类为虚弱,符合 1 项标准的患者被归类为中等虚弱,包括 6 分钟步行距离(6MWD)<300m、步态速度≤0.65m/sec 或 0.76m/sec 归一化为身高和性别、并足站立<10 秒、起立-行走测试(TUG)<15 秒和根据 Fried 标准的握力弱。比较 CR 完成前后组内和组间的变化。
我们评估了 243 名患者;75 名患者被归类为虚弱,70 名患者被归类为中等虚弱,98 名患者被归类为非虚弱。每个组在除并足站立外的所有虚弱测量指标上都有所改善。在 6MWD、步态速度、并足站立或握力方面,各组在 CR 前后的测量值之间没有显著差异。与其他组相比,虚弱患者的 TUG 改善更大(P =.007)。
在虚弱患者中,CR 与身体功能的多个领域的改善相关。虚弱成年人取得的收益与中等虚弱和非虚弱患者相当或更大。这些数据为向所有符合条件的患者转介 CR 提供了强有力的依据,包括虚弱患者。那些身体受损最严重的患者可能会获得更大比例的收益。