Ridley Ashley, Frache Sandra
University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Palliat Med. 2020 Dec;34(10):1340-1350. doi: 10.1177/0269216320947951. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
Childhood bereavement after sibling death is common, but often unrecognized. The psychosomatic and socioeconomic outcomes of bereaved children can be compromised if appropriate care is unavailable during the formative years leading into adulthood.
This review aims to describe the methods, structures and procedures of bereavement care for children and adolescents after the loss of a sibling, and the impact on the families benefiting from these interventions.
A systematic review without restriction on study design was conducted.
Four databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library) were searched for articles published from 2000 to 2019. The search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and the protocol is registered on PROSPERO under number CRD42019124675. Articles were assessed against eligibility criteria by both authors, and quality was appraised using CASP checklists and NHMRC grading guidelines.
Twenty-three studies met inclusion criteria. Bereavement care was most often accessed by children ages 6-18 who lost a sibling to cancer 6-12 months prior. The interventions were typically group sessions or weekend camps, run predominantly by unpaid staff from a variety of backgrounds. Some staff members received priori specific training. Grief education is taught through mediated discussion and bereavement-centered activities balanced with playful and relaxed activities. Several services have effectuated evaluations of their interventions, and preliminary results show a positive effect for families.
Existing literature most likely gives an incomplete picture of appropriate childhood bereavement care, and many interventions possibly remain unpublished or published in other non-scientific sources. An effective response to childhood grief would involve collaboration between medical resources and community services, reinforced through the development of outreach and training programs.
兄弟姐妹死亡后的童年丧亲情况很常见,但往往未被认识到。如果在步入成年的成长阶段得不到适当的照料,丧亲儿童的身心健康和社会经济状况可能会受到损害。
本综述旨在描述兄弟姐妹离世后为儿童和青少年提供丧亲照料的方法、结构和程序,以及这些干预措施对受益家庭的影响。
进行了一项对研究设计无限制的系统综述。
检索了四个数据库(MEDLINE、PsycINFO、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆)中2000年至2019年发表的文章。检索按照PRISMA指南进行,方案已在PROSPERO上注册,注册号为CRD42019124675。两位作者根据纳入标准对文章进行评估,并使用CASP清单和NHMRC分级指南对质量进行评价。
23项研究符合纳入标准。6至18岁的儿童在6至12个月前因癌症失去兄弟姐妹后最常获得丧亲照料。干预措施通常是小组会议或周末营地,主要由来自各种背景的无薪工作人员开展。一些工作人员接受了预先的特定培训。通过调解讨论和以丧亲为中心的活动,并与有趣和轻松的活动相结合来教授悲伤教育。一些服务机构对其干预措施进行了评估,初步结果显示对家庭有积极影响。
现有文献很可能没有完整呈现适当的童年丧亲照料情况,许多干预措施可能仍未发表或发表在其他非科学来源上。对童年悲伤的有效应对需要医疗资源和社区服务之间的合作,并通过开展外展和培训项目加以强化。