Marie Curie Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Marie Curie Research Centre and SURE, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Palliat Med. 2020 Jul;34(7):871-888. doi: 10.1177/0269216320920533. Epub 2020 May 18.
Bereavement support is a key component of palliative care, with different types of support recommended according to need. Previous reviews have typically focused on specialised interventions and have not considered more generic forms of support, drawing on different research methodologies.
To review the quantitative and qualitative evidence on the effectiveness and impact of interventions and services providing support for adults bereaved through advanced illness.
A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted, with narrative synthesis of quantitative results and thematic synthesis of qualitative results. The review protocol is published in PROSPERO ( www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero , CRD42016043530).
The databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Social Policy and Practice were searched from 1990 to March 2019. Studies were included which reported evaluation results of bereavement interventions, following screening by two independent researchers. Study quality was assessed using GATE checklists.
A total of 31 studies were included, reporting on bereavement support groups, psychological and counselling interventions and a mix of other forms of support. Improvements in study outcomes were commonly reported, but the quality of the quantitative evidence was generally poor or mixed. Three main impacts were identified in the qualitative evidence, which also varied in quality: 'loss and grief resolution', 'sense of mastery and moving ahead' and 'social support'.
Conclusions on effectiveness are limited by small sample sizes and heterogeneity in study populations, models of care and outcomes. The qualitative evidence suggests several cross-cutting benefits and helps explain the impact mechanisms and contextual factors that are integral to the support.
丧亲支持是姑息治疗的一个关键组成部分,根据需要推荐不同类型的支持。以前的综述通常侧重于专门的干预措施,而没有考虑到使用不同研究方法的更通用的支持形式。
综述为因重病而丧亲的成年人提供支持的干预措施和服务的有效性和影响的定量和定性证据。
进行了一项混合方法系统评价,对定量结果进行叙述性综合,对定性结果进行主题综合。该综述方案发表在 PROSPERO(www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero,CRD42016043530)。
从 1990 年到 2019 年 3 月,对 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL 和 Social Policy and Practice 数据库进行了搜索。纳入了报告丧亲干预评估结果的研究,这些研究由两名独立研究人员进行了筛选。使用 GATE 清单评估研究质量。
共纳入 31 项研究,报告了丧亲支持小组、心理和咨询干预以及其他形式的支持混合。研究结果通常报告有改善,但定量证据的质量普遍较差或参差不齐。定性证据中确定了三个主要影响,质量也各不相同:“失落和悲伤的解决”、“掌控感和前进”和“社会支持”。
结论受到研究人群、护理模式和结果的样本量小和异质性的限制。定性证据表明了几种交叉收益,并有助于解释支持的内在影响机制和背景因素。