Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department Woman and Baby, Wilhelmina Childrens Hospital, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Mar 12;19(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-0529-z.
The availability of interventions for bereaved parents have increased. However, most are practice based. To enhance the implementation of bereavement care for parents, an overview of interventions which are replicable and evidence-based are needed. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of well-defined bereavement interventions, focused on the parents, and delivered by regular health care professionals. Also, we explore the alignment between the interventions identified and the concepts contained in theories on grief in order to determine their theoretical evidence base.
A systematic review was conducted using the methods PALETTE and PRISMA. The search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. We included articles containing well-defined, replicable, paediatric bereavement interventions, focused on the parent, and performed by regular health care professionals. We excluded interventions on pathological grief, or interventions performed by healthcare professionals specialised in bereavement care. Quality appraisal was evaluated using the risk of bias, adapted risk of bias, or COREQ. In order to facilitate the evaluation of any theoretical foundation, a synthesis of ten theories about grief and loss was developed showing five key concepts: anticipatory grief, working models or plans, appraisal processes, coping, and continuing bonds.
Twenty-one articles were included, describing fifteen interventions. Five overarching components of intervention were identified covering the content of all interventions. These were: the acknowledgement of parenthood and the child's life; establishing keepsakes; follow-up contact; education and information, and; remembrance activities. The studies reported mainly on how to conduct, and experiences with, the interventions, but not on their effectiveness. Since most interventions lacked empirical evidence, they were evaluated against the key theoretical concepts which showed that all the components of intervention had a theoretical base.
In the absence of empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of most interventions, their alignment with theoretical components shows support for most interventions on a conceptual level. Parents should be presented with a range of interventions, covered by a variety of theoretical components, and aimed at supporting different needs. Bereavement interventions should focus more on the continuous process of the transition parents experience in readjusting to a new reality.
This systematic review was registered in Prospero (registration number: CRD42019119241).
可供丧亲父母使用的干预措施有所增加。然而,大多数干预措施都是基于实践的。为了增强对父母丧亲之痛的护理实施,需要对可复制和基于证据的干预措施进行概述。本综述的目的是概述以父母为重点并由常规保健专业人员提供的明确界定的丧亲干预措施。此外,我们还探讨了确定的干预措施与悲伤理论中包含的概念之间的一致性,以确定其理论依据。
使用 PALETTE 和 PRISMA 方法进行系统综述。检索范围包括 MEDLINE、Embase 和 CINAHL。我们纳入了包含明确界定、可复制、以儿科丧亲之痛为重点且由常规保健专业人员实施的干预措施的文章。我们排除了针对病理性悲伤或由专门从事丧亲护理的医疗保健专业人员实施的干预措施。使用风险偏倚、适应性风险偏倚或 COREQ 进行质量评估。为了便于评估任何理论基础,我们综合了十种关于悲伤和失落的理论,提出了五个关键概念:预期悲伤、工作模型或计划、评估过程、应对和持续联系。
共纳入 21 篇文章,描述了 15 项干预措施。确定了干预措施的五个总体组成部分,涵盖了所有干预措施的内容。这些组成部分是:承认父母身份和孩子的生命;建立纪念品;后续联系;教育和信息;以及纪念活动。这些研究主要报告了如何实施干预措施以及实施干预措施的经验,但没有报告干预措施的效果。由于大多数干预措施缺乏实证证据,因此根据关键理论概念对其进行了评估,这些概念表明干预措施的所有组成部分都有理论基础。
在缺乏大多数干预措施有效性的实证证据的情况下,它们与理论组成部分的一致性表明,大多数干预措施在概念层面上得到了支持。应向父母提供一系列干预措施,涵盖各种理论组成部分,并旨在满足不同的需求。丧亲干预措施应更侧重于父母在重新适应新现实的过程中所经历的持续转变。
本系统评价在 Prospero 注册(注册号:CRD42019119241)。