Fafo Institute for Labour and Social Research, Norway.
Scand J Public Health. 2021 Mar;49(2):219-227. doi: 10.1177/1403494820946543. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
This study aimed to investigate whether introducing workplace health-promotion interventions targeting employees with health problems or reduced work ability affected overall sick leave and disability risk.
The study population comprised data from an establishment survey from 2010 identifying who had introduced workplace health promotion (the intervention) linked to register data on all employees and their sickness absence and disability pension uptake from 2000 through 2010.
Interventions had moderate effects due to varying efficacy in different parts of the labour market. Intervention success was more likely among white-collar workers (e.g. in public administration) compared to blue-collar workers (e.g. in manufacturing), probably due to variations in both organisational and technological constraints. Effects were small among men and moderate among older workers, particularly among women. Overall, disability risk reduction was accompanied by an increase in sickness absence. Sometimes, sickness absence increased in groups with no change in disability risk, suggesting that presenteeism in one group may increase absenteeism in other groups.
本研究旨在探讨针对有健康问题或工作能力下降的员工实施工作场所健康促进干预措施,是否会影响总病假和残疾风险。
研究人群为 2010 年一项机构调查的数据,该调查确定了哪些人引入了与 2000 年至 2010 年所有员工的注册数据相关的工作场所健康促进(干预),以及他们的病假和残疾养老金的情况。
由于在劳动力市场的不同部分的疗效不同,干预措施的效果中等。白领工人(例如公共管理部门)比蓝领工人(例如制造业)更有可能成功实施干预措施,这可能是由于组织和技术限制的差异造成的。男性和老年工人(特别是女性)的效果较小,而残疾风险降低伴随着病假的增加。有时,在残疾风险没有变化的情况下,某些群体的病假增加,这表明一个群体的出勤主义可能会增加其他群体的旷工。