Suppr超能文献

对于因急性胸痛到急诊科就诊的患者,联合应激心肌 CT 灌注和冠状动脉 CT 血管造影是一种可行的策略。

Combined stress myocardial CT perfusion and coronary CT angiography as a feasible strategy among patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department.

机构信息

Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Medicine, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Radiology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021 Mar-Apr;15(2):129-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.06.195. Epub 2020 Jul 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A combined approach of myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) with coronary CT angiography (CTA) was shown to have better diagnostic accuracy than coronary CTA alone. However, data on cost benefits and length of stay when compared to other perfusion imaging modalities has not been evaluated. Therefore, we aim to perform a feasibility study to assess direct costs and length of stay of a combined stress CTP/CTA and use SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) as a benchmark, among chest pain patients at intermediate-risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) presenting to the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

This is a prospective two-arm clinical trial (NCT02538861) with 43 patients enrolled in stress CTP/CTA arm (General Electric Revolution CT) and 102 in SPECT-MPI arm. Mean age of the study population was 65 ​± ​12 years; 56% were men. We used multivariable linear regression analysis to compare length of stay and direct costs between the two modalities.

RESULTS

Overall, 9 out of the 43 patients (21%) with CTP/CTA testing had an abnormal test. Of these 9 patients, 7 patients underwent invasive coronary angiography and 6 patients were found to have obstructive coronary artery disease. Normal CTP/CTA test was found in 34 patients (79%), who were discharged home and all patients were free of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days. The mean length of stay was significantly shorter by 28% (mean difference: 14.7 ​h; 95% CI: 0.7, 21) among stress CTP/CTA (20 ​h [IQR: 16, 37]) compared to SPECT-MPI (30 ​h [IQR: 19, 44.5]). Mean direct costs were significantly lower by 44% (mean difference: $1535; 95% CI: 987, 2082) among stress CTA/CTP ($1750 [IQR: 1474, 2114] compared to SPECT-MPI ($2837 [IQR: 2491, 3554]).

CONCLUSION

Combined stress CTP/CTA is a feasible strategy for evaluation of chest pain patients presenting to ED at intermediate-risk for ACS and has the potential to lead to shorter length of stay and lower direct costs.

摘要

背景

心肌 CT 灌注(CTP)与冠状动脉 CT 血管造影(CTA)相结合的方法比单独进行冠状动脉 CTA 具有更高的诊断准确性。然而,与其他灌注成像方式相比,其成本效益和住院时间的数据尚未得到评估。因此,我们旨在进行一项可行性研究,评估在急诊科(ED)就诊的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)中危胸痛患者中,联合应激 CTP/CTA 的直接成本和住院时间,并以单光子发射计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像(SPECT-MPI)作为基准。

方法

这是一项前瞻性的双臂临床试验(NCT02538861),43 名患者入组 CTP/CTA 组(GE Revolution CT),102 名患者入组 SPECT-MPI 组。研究人群的平均年龄为 65±12 岁,56%为男性。我们使用多变量线性回归分析比较两种方式的住院时间和直接成本。

结果

总体而言,43 名接受 CTP/CTA 检测的患者中有 9 名(21%)的检测结果异常。在这 9 名患者中,有 7 名患者进行了冠状动脉造影,有 6 名患者被发现有阻塞性冠状动脉疾病。34 名(79%)正常 CTP/CTA 检测的患者出院回家,所有患者在 30 天内无重大不良心脏事件。应激 CTP/CTA 组的平均住院时间明显缩短了 28%(平均差异:14.7 小时;95%CI:0.7,21),为 20 小时(IQR:16,37),而 SPECT-MPI 组为 30 小时(IQR:19,44.5)。应激 CTP/CTA 组的直接成本平均降低了 44%(平均差异:$1535;95%CI:$987,$2082),为$1750(IQR:$1474,$2114),而 SPECT-MPI 组为$2837(IQR:$2491,$3554)。

结论

对于急诊科就诊的中危 ACS 胸痛患者,联合应激 CTP/CTA 是一种可行的评估策略,有潜力缩短住院时间和降低直接成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验