Suppr超能文献

三种免疫层析检测方法快速检测 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的评价。

Evaluation of three immunochromatographic tests for rapid detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.

机构信息

Clinical Microbiology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de La Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.

Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;39(12):2289-2297. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04010-7. Epub 2020 Aug 17.

Abstract

Lateral flow immunoassays (LFIA) for rapid detection of specific antibodies (IgM and IgG) against SARS-CoV-2 in different human specimens have been developed in response to the pandemic. The aim of this study is to evaluate three immunocromathographic assays (Sienna®, Wondfo® and Prometheus®) for detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in serum samples, considering RT-qPCR as a reference. A total of 145 serum samples from 145 patients with clinical suspicion of COVID-19 were collected: all of the samples were tested with Sienna®, 117 with Wondfo® and 89 with Prometheus®. The overall results of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value obtained were as follows: 64.4%, 75%, 85.5% and 47.8% with Sienna®; 45.2%, 81.8%, 80.5% and 47.4% with Wondfo® and 75.5%, 12.5%, 51.4% and 29.4% with Prometheus®. The accuracy of the test for Sienna®, Wondfo® and Prometheus® was 67.6%, 59% and 47.2%, with a prevalence of COVID-19 of 69.7%, 62.4% and 55.1% respectively. Sensitivity of the three tests (Sienna®, Wondfo® and Prometheus® respectively) along the three different stages was 36.6%, 18.8% and 68.6% in the early stage (first week); 81.3%, 74.1% and 90.9% in the intermediate stage (second week) and 100%, 83.3% and 100% in the late stage (third week). The results demonstrate that even though Prometheus® presented a high sensitivity, the specificity was notably lower than the other two tests. Sienna® showed the greatest contrast between sensitivity and specificity, achieving the best accuracy, followed by Wondfo®. The sensitivity of the three ICT assays was higher in late stages of the disease.

摘要

侧向流动免疫分析(LFIA)用于快速检测针对 SARS-CoV-2 的特定抗体(IgM 和 IgG),已针对大流行而开发。本研究旨在评估三种免疫层析测定法(Sienna ® 、Wondfo ® 和 Prometheus ® )在血清样本中检测针对 SARS-CoV-2 的抗体,以 RT-qPCR 为参考。共收集了 145 例有 COVID-19 临床疑似症状的患者的 145 份血清样本:所有样本均用 Sienna ® 进行检测,117 份用 Wondfo ® 检测,89 份用 Prometheus ® 检测。获得的总体敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值结果如下:Sienna ® 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 64.4%、75%、85.5%和 47.8%;Wondfo ® 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 45.2%、81.8%、80.5%和 47.4%;Prometheus ® 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 75.5%、12.5%、51.4%和 29.4%。Sienna ® 、Wondfo ® 和 Prometheus ® 检测的准确性分别为 67.6%、59%和 47.2%,COVID-19 的流行率分别为 69.7%、62.4%和 55.1%。三种检测方法(Sienna ® 、Wondfo ® 和 Prometheus ® )的敏感性在早期(第一周)分别为 36.6%、18.8%和 68.6%;在中期(第二周)分别为 81.3%、74.1%和 90.9%;在晚期(第三周)分别为 100%、83.3%和 100%。结果表明,尽管 Prometheus ® 具有较高的敏感性,但特异性明显低于其他两种检测方法。Sienna ® 在敏感性和特异性之间显示出最大的差异,其准确性最高,其次是 Wondfo ® 。三种 ICT 检测方法的敏感性在疾病的晚期更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6af1/7431115/60d06f3af90d/10096_2020_4010_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验