Sibai Mamdouh, Solis Daniel, Röltgen Katharina, Stevens Bryan A, Mfuh Kenji O, Sahoo Malaya K, Shi Run Z, Zehnder James, Boyd Scott D, Pinsky Benjamin A
Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Clinical Virology Laboratory, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA.
J Clin Virol. 2021 Jun;139:104818. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104818. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) endgame may benefit from simple, accurate antibody testing to characterize seroprevalence and immunization coverage.
To evaluate the performance of the lateral flow QIAreach anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total rapid nanoparticle fluorescence immunoassay compared to reference isotype-specific IgG, IgM, and IgA SARS-CoV-2 ELISA using S1 or receptor binding domain (RBD) as antigens.
A diagnostic comparison study was carried out using 154 well-characterized heparin plasma samples. Agreement between assays was assessed by overall, positive, and negative percent agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient.
Overall agreement between the QIAreach anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total and any anti-spike domain (S1 or RBD) antibody isotype was 96.0 % (95 % CI 89.8-98.8), the positive percent agreement was 97.6 % (95 % CI 91.0-99.9), the negative percent agreement was 88.2 % (95 % CI 64.4-98.0). The kappa coefficient was 0.86 (95 % CI 0.72 to 0.99).
The QIAreach anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total rapid antibody test provides comparable performance to high-complexity, laboratory-based ELISA.
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的最终阶段可能受益于简单、准确的抗体检测,以确定血清流行率和免疫覆盖率。
与使用S1或受体结合域(RBD)作为抗原的参考同种型特异性IgG、IgM和IgA SARS-CoV-2 ELISA相比,评估侧向流动QIAreach抗SARS-CoV-2总快速纳米颗粒荧光免疫测定的性能。
使用154份特征明确的肝素血浆样本进行诊断比较研究。通过总体、阳性和阴性百分比一致性以及科恩kappa系数评估检测之间的一致性。
QIAreach抗SARS-CoV-2总检测与任何抗刺突域(S1或RBD)抗体同种型之间的总体一致性为96.0%(95%CI 89.8-98.8),阳性百分比一致性为97.6%(95%CI 91.0-99.9),阴性百分比一致性为88.2%(95%CI 64.4-98.0)。kappa系数为0.86(95%CI 0.72至0.99)。
QIAreach抗SARS-CoV-2总快速抗体检测与基于实验室的高复杂性ELISA具有相当的性能。