Suppr超能文献

新冠病毒抗体检测的作用:有这样一种作用吗?

The Role of Antibody Testing for SARS-CoV-2: Is There One?

作者信息

Theel Elitza S, Slev Patricia, Wheeler Sarah, Couturier Marc Roger, Wong Susan J, Kadkhoda Kamran

机构信息

Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00797-20.

Abstract

The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) brought with it rapid development of both molecular and serologic assays for identification of COVID-19 infections. While Food and Drug Administration (FDA) emergency use authorization (EUA) is required for clinical application of SARS-CoV-2 molecular tests, submission for EUA is currently a voluntary process for manufacturers of serologic assays. The absence of FDA oversight of serologic tests is concerning given that the commercially available serologic assays are highly variable, differing in their format, the antibody class detected, the targeted antigen, and the acceptable specimen types. An added complication is the lack of a clear understanding for how such assays should be utilized and what the reported results ultimately indicate or, perhaps more importantly, what they do not indicate. Here, we provide a brief summary of the performance of a number of serologic assays reported in the literature, comment on what we do and do not know regarding our immune response to SARS-CoV-2, and provide a number of scenarios for which serologic testing will play a role during our global response to this pandemic.

摘要

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的出现促使用于识别新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)感染的分子检测和血清学检测迅速发展。虽然SARS-CoV-2分子检测的临床应用需要美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的紧急使用授权(EUA),但目前血清学检测制造商提交EUA申请是一个自愿过程。鉴于市售血清学检测高度可变,在检测形式、检测的抗体类别、靶向抗原和可接受的标本类型方面存在差异,FDA对血清学检测缺乏监管令人担忧。另一个复杂问题是,对于如何使用此类检测以及报告的结果最终表明了什么,或者也许更重要的是,它们没有表明什么,人们缺乏清晰的认识。在此,我们简要总结了文献中报道的一些血清学检测的性能,对我们对SARS-CoV-2免疫反应的已知和未知情况进行评论,并提供血清学检测在全球应对这一疫情期间将发挥作用的一些场景。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Testing for SARS-CoV-2: lessons learned and current use cases.SARS-CoV-2 检测:经验教训和当前应用案例。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Jun 13;37(2):e0007223. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00072-23. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

2
The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape.2019冠状病毒病疫苗的研发情况。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020 May;19(5):305-306. doi: 10.1038/d41573-020-00073-5.
7
Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019.住院 COVID-19 患者的病毒学评估。
Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):465-469. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
8
Follow-up of asymptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.新型冠状病毒2019感染无症状患者的随访
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Jul;26(7):957-959. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.03.024. Epub 2020 Mar 28.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验