Theel Elitza S, Slev Patricia, Wheeler Sarah, Couturier Marc Roger, Wong Susan J, Kadkhoda Kamran
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00797-20.
The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) brought with it rapid development of both molecular and serologic assays for identification of COVID-19 infections. While Food and Drug Administration (FDA) emergency use authorization (EUA) is required for clinical application of SARS-CoV-2 molecular tests, submission for EUA is currently a voluntary process for manufacturers of serologic assays. The absence of FDA oversight of serologic tests is concerning given that the commercially available serologic assays are highly variable, differing in their format, the antibody class detected, the targeted antigen, and the acceptable specimen types. An added complication is the lack of a clear understanding for how such assays should be utilized and what the reported results ultimately indicate or, perhaps more importantly, what they do not indicate. Here, we provide a brief summary of the performance of a number of serologic assays reported in the literature, comment on what we do and do not know regarding our immune response to SARS-CoV-2, and provide a number of scenarios for which serologic testing will play a role during our global response to this pandemic.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的出现促使用于识别新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)感染的分子检测和血清学检测迅速发展。虽然SARS-CoV-2分子检测的临床应用需要美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的紧急使用授权(EUA),但目前血清学检测制造商提交EUA申请是一个自愿过程。鉴于市售血清学检测高度可变,在检测形式、检测的抗体类别、靶向抗原和可接受的标本类型方面存在差异,FDA对血清学检测缺乏监管令人担忧。另一个复杂问题是,对于如何使用此类检测以及报告的结果最终表明了什么,或者也许更重要的是,它们没有表明什么,人们缺乏清晰的认识。在此,我们简要总结了文献中报道的一些血清学检测的性能,对我们对SARS-CoV-2免疫反应的已知和未知情况进行评论,并提供血清学检测在全球应对这一疫情期间将发挥作用的一些场景。