利用“医疗监测器”在头颈部肿瘤学中成功实施常规症状监测的关键以及患者对医疗质量的看法。

Keys to successful implementation of routine symptom monitoring in head and neck oncology with "Healthcare Monitor" and patients' perspectives of quality of care.

作者信息

Dronkers Emilie A C, Baatenburg de Jong Robert J, van der Poel Egge F, Sewnaik Aniel, Offerman Marinella P J

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2020 Dec;42(12):3590-3600. doi: 10.1002/hed.26425. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Value-based health care is increasingly used to facilitate a systematic approach during follow-up of patients. We developed Healthcare Monitor (HM): a structure of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROs) for the longitudinal follow-up of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. This study shares key lessons from implementation and seeks to provide insight into how patients experience HM.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed-methods study using quantitative data from a nonrandomized retrospective survey of patients who received HM (n = 45) vs standard care (n = 46) and qualitative data from structured interviews (n = 15).

RESULTS

Implementation of HM included significant challenges. Finding common ground among clinicians, administrators, and IT staff was most important. Qualitative findings suggest that patients experienced better doctor-patient communication and increased efficiency of the consultation using HM. Patients felt better prepared and experienced more focus on critical issues. Quantitative analysis did not show significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Integration of HM into routine care for HNC patients may have increased patient-centered care and facilitated screening of symptoms. However, future research is needed to analyze the potential benefits more extensively.

摘要

背景

基于价值的医疗保健越来越多地用于在患者随访期间促进系统方法。我们开发了医疗保健监测器(HM):一种用于头颈癌(HNC)患者纵向随访的电子患者报告结局测量(ePRO)结构。本研究分享了实施过程中的关键经验教训,并试图深入了解患者对HM的体验。

方法

我们进行了一项混合方法研究,使用了来自接受HM的患者(n = 45)与接受标准护理的患者(n = 46)的非随机回顾性调查的定量数据,以及来自结构化访谈(n = 15)的定性数据。

结果

HM的实施面临重大挑战。在临床医生、管理人员和信息技术人员之间找到共同点最为重要。定性研究结果表明,患者通过使用HM体验到了更好的医患沟通,并提高了咨询效率。患者感觉准备更充分,并且体验到对关键问题的更多关注。定量分析未显示出显著差异。

结论

将HM纳入HNC患者的常规护理可能增加了以患者为中心的护理,并促进了症状筛查。然而,需要未来的研究更广泛地分析潜在益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfd5/7754276/0cde4bbfb80c/HED-42-3590-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索