• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头颈肿瘤学实践中电子患者报告结局作为护理标准整合的案例研究:障碍与机遇

Case study of the integration of electronic patient-reported outcomes as standard of care in a head and neck oncology practice: Obstacles and opportunities.

作者信息

Strachna Olga, Cohen Marc A, Allison Monica M, Pfister David G, Lee Nancy Y, Wong Richard J, McBride Sean M, Mohammed Raia R, Kemeny Elizabeth, Polubriaginof Fernanda C G, Kassa Alyse, Hannon Michael, Cracchiolo Jennifer R

机构信息

Division of Health Informatics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey.

出版信息

Cancer. 2021 Feb 1;127(3):359-371. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33272. Epub 2020 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.33272
PMID:33107986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8375640/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) allow for the direct measurement of functional and psychosocial effects related to treatment. However, technological barriers, survey fatigue, and clinician adoption have hindered the meaningful integration of PROs into clinical care. The objective of the authors was to develop an electronic PROs (ePROs) program that meets a range of clinical needs across a head and neck multidisciplinary disease management team.

METHODS

The authors developed the ePROs module using literature review and stakeholder input in collaboration with health informatics. They designed an ePROs platform that was integrated as the standard of care for personalized survey delivery by diagnosis across the disease management team. Tableau software was used to create dashboards for data visualization and monitoring at the clinical enterprise, disease subsite, and patient levels. All patients who were treated for head and neck cancer were eligible for ePROs assessment as part of the standard of care. A descriptive analysis of ePROs program implementation is presented herein.

RESULTS

The Head and Neck Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center has integrated ePROs into clinical care. Surveys are delivered via the patient portal at the time of diagnosis and longitudinally through care. From August 1, 2018, to February 1, 2020, a total of 4154 patients completed ePROs surveys. The average patient participation rate was 69%, with a median time for completion of 5 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Integration of the head and neck ePROs program as part of clinical care is feasible and could be used to assess value and counsel patients in the future. Continued qualitative assessments of stakeholders and workflow will refine content and enhance the health informatics platform.

LAY SUMMARY

Patients with head and neck cancer experience significant changes in their quality of life after treatment. Measuring and integrating patient-reported outcomes as a part of clinical care have been challenging given the multimodal treatment options, vast subsites, and unique domains affected. The authors present a case study of the successful integration of electronic patient-reported outcomes into a high-volume head and neck cancer practice.

摘要

背景

患者报告结局(PROs)能够直接衡量与治疗相关的功能和心理社会影响。然而,技术障碍、调查疲劳以及临床医生的接受度阻碍了将PROs有意义地整合到临床护理中。作者的目标是开发一个电子PROs(ePROs)项目,以满足头颈多学科疾病管理团队的一系列临床需求。

方法

作者通过文献综述和利益相关者的意见,并与健康信息学合作,开发了ePROs模块。他们设计了一个ePROs平台,该平台被整合为疾病管理团队中按诊断进行个性化调查交付的护理标准。Tableau软件用于创建仪表板,以便在临床机构、疾病亚部位和患者层面进行数据可视化和监测。所有接受头颈癌治疗的患者都有资格接受ePROs评估,作为护理标准的一部分。本文介绍了ePROs项目实施的描述性分析。

结果

纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心的头颈科已将ePROs整合到临床护理中。调查在诊断时通过患者门户网站进行,并在整个护理过程中纵向开展。从2018年8月1日至2020年2月1日,共有4154名患者完成了ePROs调查。患者的平均参与率为69%,完成调查的中位时间为5分钟。

结论

将头颈ePROs项目作为临床护理的一部分进行整合是可行的,并且未来可用于评估价值并为患者提供咨询。对利益相关者和工作流程持续进行定性评估将完善内容并增强健康信息学平台。

简要概述

头颈癌患者在治疗后生活质量会发生显著变化。鉴于多模式治疗选择、众多亚部位以及受影响的独特领域,将患者报告结局作为临床护理的一部分进行测量和整合一直具有挑战性。作者展示了一个将电子患者报告结局成功整合到大量头颈癌诊疗实践中的案例研究。

相似文献

1
Case study of the integration of electronic patient-reported outcomes as standard of care in a head and neck oncology practice: Obstacles and opportunities.头颈肿瘤学实践中电子患者报告结局作为护理标准整合的案例研究:障碍与机遇
Cancer. 2021 Feb 1;127(3):359-371. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33272. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
2
Real-World Use of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) Tools Integrated in the Electronic Medical Record During Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Feasibility Study.电子病历中整合的电子患者报告结局(ePRO)工具在头颈部癌症放射治疗中的真实世界应用:可行性研究。
Perm J. 2023 Sep 15;27(3):60-67. doi: 10.7812/TPP/23.046. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
3
Acceptance, Usage, and Barriers of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Among German Rheumatologists: Survey Study.德国风湿病学家对电子患者报告结局的接受度、使用情况和障碍:调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 20;8(7):e18117. doi: 10.2196/18117.
4
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trials: From an Endpoint to an Intervention in Cancer Care.临床试验中的患者报告结局:从终点指标到癌症治疗中的干预措施。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2023 Oct;33(4):358-366. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.07.002.
5
Head and Neck Cancer: Improving Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Clinical Practice.头颈部癌症:改善临床实践中的患者报告结局测量。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;19(11):59. doi: 10.1007/s11864-018-0578-1.
6
Patient motivators of postoperative electronic patient-reported outcome symptom monitoring use in thoracic surgery patients: a qualitative study.术后电子患者报告结局症状监测在胸外科患者中的使用:一项定性研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jul 25;8(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00766-0.
7
Electronic reporting of patient-reported outcomes in a fragile and comorbid population during cancer therapy - a feasibility study.电子报告在癌症治疗期间脆弱且合并症较多的患者中的患者报告结局 - 一项可行性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jul 11;18(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01480-3.
8
Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy.成人抗肿瘤治疗后症状远程监测项目分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e221078. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1078.
9
Adapting an integrated care pathway for implementing electronic patient reported outcomes assessment in routine oncology care: Lessons learned from a case study.改编综合护理路径以在常规肿瘤护理中实施电子患者报告结局评估:来自案例研究的经验教训。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Dec;28(6):1072-1083. doi: 10.1111/jep.13688. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
10
Leveraging patient-reported outcomes data to inform oncology clinical decision making: Introducing the FACE-Q Head and Neck Cancer Module.利用患者报告结局数据为肿瘤学临床决策提供信息:引入 FACE-Q 头颈部癌症模块。
Cancer. 2019 Mar 15;125(6):863-872. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31900. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Electronic patient-reported outcome systems and capabilities in cancer care: a systematic review.癌症护理中的电子患者报告结局系统及功能:一项系统综述
Front Digit Health. 2025 Aug 18;7:1560533. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1560533. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploratory analysis of electronic patient-reported outcomes collection: comparing online and in-clinic modalities in cancer care.电子患者报告结局收集的探索性分析:比较癌症护理中的在线和门诊模式
Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03975-2.
3
Advancing patient-centered cancer care: a systematic review of electronic patient-reported outcome measures.

本文引用的文献

1
Ambulatory cancer care electronic symptom self-reporting (ACCESS) for surgical patients: a randomised controlled trial protocol.门诊癌症护理电子症状自我报告 (ACCESS) 用于手术患者:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):e030863. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030863.
2
Value of patient-reported symptoms in the follow up of patients potentially cured of laryngeal carcinoma.患者报告症状在潜在治愈喉癌患者随访中的价值
J Laryngol Otol. 2019 Jun;133(6):508-514. doi: 10.1017/S0022215119000677. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
3
Using Stakeholder Engagement to Overcome Barriers to Implementing Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs) in Cancer Care Delivery: Approaches From 3 Prospective Studies.
推进以患者为中心的癌症护理:电子患者报告结局指标的系统评价
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Sep 25;5:1427712. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1427712. eCollection 2024.
4
A Collection of Components to Design Clinical Dashboards Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Qualitative Study.纳入患者报告结局指标的临床仪表盘设计组件集:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 2;26:e55267. doi: 10.2196/55267.
5
Improving Practice in a Head and Neck Oncology Clinic Using the PRO-CTCAE Tool.使用PRO-CTCAE工具改善头颈肿瘤诊所的实践
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2024 Jul;15(5):303-310. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.5.2. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
6
The advantages, disadvantages, threats, and opportunities of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in cancer: A systematic review.癌症电子患者报告结局系统的优势、劣势、威胁与机遇:一项系统综述。
Digit Health. 2024 May 27;10:20552076241257146. doi: 10.1177/20552076241257146. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
7
Examining disparities in large-scale patient-reported data capture using digital tools among cancer patients at clinical intake.利用数字工具在癌症患者临床入组时大规模采集患者报告数据,考察其中的差异。
Cancer Med. 2023 Sep;12(18):19033-19046. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6459. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
8
Automated Dashboards for the Identification of Pathogenic Circulating Tumor DNA Mutations in Longitudinal Blood Draws of Cancer Patients.用于识别癌症患者纵向采血中致病性循环肿瘤DNA突变的自动化仪表盘
Methods Protoc. 2023 May 1;6(3):46. doi: 10.3390/mps6030046.
9
Implementation of electronic prospective surveillance models in cancer care: a scoping review.电子前瞻性监测模型在癌症护理中的实施:范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2023 Apr 26;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01265-4.
10
Real time patient-reported outcome measures in patients with cancer: Early experience within an integrated health system.癌症患者的实时患者报告结局测量:在综合卫生系统中的早期经验。
Cancer Med. 2023 Apr;12(7):8860-8870. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5635. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
利用利益相关者参与克服癌症护理提供中实施患者报告结局(PROs)的障碍:来自 3 项前瞻性研究的方法。
Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1:S92-S99. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001103.
4
Using Feedback Intervention Theory to Guide Clinical Dashboard Design.运用反馈干预理论指导临床仪表盘设计。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:395-403. eCollection 2018.
5
Leveraging patient-reported outcomes data to inform oncology clinical decision making: Introducing the FACE-Q Head and Neck Cancer Module.利用患者报告结局数据为肿瘤学临床决策提供信息:引入 FACE-Q 头颈部癌症模块。
Cancer. 2019 Mar 15;125(6):863-872. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31900. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
6
The Impact of Visualization Dashboards on Quality of Care and Clinician Satisfaction: Integrative Literature Review.可视化仪表盘对医疗质量和临床医生满意度的影响:综合文献综述
JMIR Hum Factors. 2018 May 31;5(2):e22. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.9328.
7
Is routine holistic assessment with a prompt list feasible during consultations after treatment for oral cancer?在口腔癌治疗后的会诊期间,使用提示清单进行常规整体评估是否可行?
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jan;56(1):24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
8
Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment.一项评估常规癌症治疗期间症状监测的患者报告结局的试验的总生存结果。
JAMA. 2017 Jul 11;318(2):197-198. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7156.
9
PRO-cision Medicine: Personalizing Patient Care Using Patient-Reported Outcomes.精准医学:利用患者报告的结果实现个性化医疗护理。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 20;34(6):527-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.9491. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
10
Dashboards for improving patient care: review of the literature.用于改善患者护理的仪表盘:文献综述
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Feb;84(2):87-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 12.