Padalkar Tanvi V, Henderson Nicole L, Dent D'Ambra N, Hendrix Emma, Smith Catherine, Huang Chao-Hui Sylvia, Kaufmann Tara, McGowan Chelsea, Young Pierce Jennifer, Ingram Stacey A, Stover Angela M, Basch Ethan M, Howell Doris, Weiner Bryan J, Odom J Nicholas, Rocque Gabrielle B
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025 Jun;9:e2400232. doi: 10.1200/CCI-24-00232. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
Remote symptom monitoring (RSM) using electronic patient-reported outcomes leverages digital technologies to gather real-time information on patient experiences for symptom management. This study reports a formative evaluation of technology-related barriers encountered by patients participating in RSM and implementation strategies used to address those barriers in real-world, large-scale RSM implementations.
Purposive sampling was conducted to recruit patients diagnosed with cancer and participating in RSM at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and USA Health Mitchell Cancer Institute for semi-structured interviews. Interviews were coded to identify technology-related barriers using a constant comparative method. Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change list was used to address the barriers to optimize RSM implementation. Barrier-associated themes from the interviews were mapped to implementation strategies.
Forty participants age 24-77 years, half of whom were 60 years or older, were interviewed from December 2021 to February 2024. Three barrier themes relevant to technology utilization in RSM were identified: (1) , (2) , and (3) . Themes were mapped to the implementation strategies as identified by the implementation team. Eight total implementation strategies were used to address these technology barriers: (1) assess for readiness and identify barriers and facilitators, (2) obtain and use patients/consumers and family/caregiver feedback, (3) involve patients/consumers and family members/caregivers, (4) access new funding, (5) change physical structure and equipment, (6) centralize technical assistance, (7) prepare patients/consumers to be active participants, and (8) intervene with patients/consumers to enhance uptake and adherence.
Technology-related barriers may limit the uptake of RSM by patients. Addressing these barriers through multimodel assessment and intervention strategies is crucial to ensuring successful implementation of RSM in real-world settings.
使用电子患者报告结局的远程症状监测(RSM)利用数字技术收集有关患者症状管理体验的实时信息。本研究报告了对参与RSM的患者所遇到的技术相关障碍的形成性评估,以及在现实世界大规模RSM实施中用于解决这些障碍的实施策略。
采用目的抽样法,招募在阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校和美国健康米切尔癌症研究所被诊断为癌症并参与RSM的患者进行半结构化访谈。使用恒定比较法对访谈进行编码,以识别技术相关障碍。使用《实施变革专家建议清单》来解决障碍,以优化RSM实施。将访谈中与障碍相关的主题映射到实施策略上。
2021年12月至2024年2月对40名年龄在24 - 77岁之间的参与者进行了访谈,其中一半年龄在60岁及以上。确定了与RSM技术应用相关的三个障碍主题:(1) ,(2) ,以及(3) 。这些主题被映射到实施团队确定的实施策略上。总共使用了八种实施策略来解决这些技术障碍:(1)评估准备情况并识别障碍和促进因素,(2)获取并利用患者/消费者以及家庭/护理人员的反馈,(3)让患者/消费者以及家庭成员/护理人员参与,(4)获取新资金,(5)改变物理结构和设备,(6)集中技术援助,(7)让患者/消费者做好积极参与者的准备,以及(8)对患者/消费者进行干预以提高接受度和依从性。
技术相关障碍可能会限制患者对RSM的接受度。通过多模式评估和干预策略解决这些障碍对于确保RSM在现实环境中成功实施至关重要。