Division of Medicine, Department of Vascular Medicine, Centre for Preventive Cardiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška 7, 1525, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2021 Mar;21(2):139-151. doi: 10.1007/s40256-020-00424-y.
The use of aspirin has been widely accepted for the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in all patient populations, as the benefits linked to the reduction of clinical events outweigh the risk of major bleeding. However, despite the undisputable, though modest, potential of aspirin to reduce atherothrombotic events, its overall efficacy and safety in primary ASCVD prevention remains debatable, despite being used for this purpose for decades. The net clinical benefit of aspirin was brought into question by three recent large contemporary randomized controlled trials evaluating its role in various primary prevention populations (individuals with diabetes [ASCEND], an elderly population [ASPREE], and middle-aged adults at high estimated cardiovascular risk [ARRIVE]) and numerous large meta-analyses published during the past year. As a result, the usual generalized recommendations for the use of aspirin in patients with estimated intermediate to high ASCVD risk but without overt ASCVD have already been removed from most international guidelines. Since the primary prevention framework encompasses heterogenous groups of subjects with variable absolute ASCVD risk, a more individualized approach based on the best possible estimated ratio between the potential health benefits from fewer atherothrombotic events and harms because of potential increases in major bleeding is warranted in clinical practice. With this compromise, clinicians can better decide on the personalized use of aspirin in patients at high risk of major adverse cardiovascular events.
阿司匹林已被广泛用于所有患者人群的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)二级预防,因为与临床事件减少相关的益处超过了大出血风险。然而,尽管阿司匹林具有降低动脉粥样血栓形成事件的无可争议但适度的潜力,但在 ASCVD 一级预防中,其总体疗效和安全性仍存在争议,尽管数十年来一直将其用于该目的。三项最近的大型当代随机对照试验评估了阿司匹林在各种一级预防人群(糖尿病患者[ASCEND]、老年人群[ASPREE]和高估计心血管风险的中年成年人[ARRIVE])中的作用,并在过去一年中发表了许多大型荟萃分析,对阿司匹林的净临床获益提出了质疑。因此,大多数国际指南已经不再推荐将阿司匹林用于估计有中到高 ASCVD 风险但没有明显 ASCVD 的患者。由于一级预防框架涵盖了具有不同绝对 ASCVD 风险的异质亚组人群,因此在临床实践中需要基于潜在的动脉粥样血栓形成事件减少带来的健康益处与因潜在大出血增加带来的危害之间的最佳估计比值进行更个体化的方法。通过这种妥协,临床医生可以更好地决定在发生主要不良心血管事件风险高的患者中个体化使用阿司匹林。