Roeser Stephanea, Duval Sue, Luepker Russell V, Eder Milton, Finnegan John R, Van't Hof Jeremy R
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, 100134209 28th St, Long Island, NY 11101, USA.
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 1300 South Second Street, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Feb 8;21:100941. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.100941. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Aspirin use for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is widespread with over a third of the adult population using despite guidelines recommending against.
This population-based research documents rates of use and reasons for cessation from 2015 to 2020, a period when guidelines changed.
Three cross-sectional telephone surveys were conducted during 2015, 2017, and 2019-20.
A population-based survey in the states of Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.
The surveys included non-institutionalized resident adults ages 55-79 for women and 45-79 for men with landline telephones.
The analysis included 8,197 participants, 4,161 women and 4,036 men after excluding those with a history of cardiovascular disease (secondary prevention). Aspirin use for primary prevention was stable for the first two survey years (39 % in 2015 and 41 % in 2017) but fell significantly to 34 % in the final survey (2019-2020). The most common reason for cessation was "doctor's advice" (38 % of quitters) followed by "heard negative news" with a significant increase from 2015 to 2020 (4 % to 29 % of quitters).
Despite recent research findings and new guidelines, aspirin is still widely used for primary prevention of CVD in the general population. A combination of slow diffusion and implementation of guidelines, self-medication, and wide availability of low-cost aspirin underlies these trends. Physician advice is effective but more is needed. The influence of the popular media is also substantial. Appropriate implementation of aspirin guidelines requires additional clinician effort.
Clinicaltrials.gov registered on December 1, 2014, NCT02607917.
阿司匹林用于心血管疾病(CVD)一级预防的情况很普遍,超过三分之一的成年人口在使用,尽管指南并不推荐这样做。
这项基于人群的研究记录了2015年至2020年期间(指南发生变化的时期)的使用比率和停药原因。
在2015年、2017年以及2019 - 2020年期间进行了三次横断面电话调查。
在爱荷华州、明尼苏达州、北达科他州、南达科他州和威斯康星州开展的一项基于人群的调查。
调查对象包括年龄在55 - 79岁的非机构化成年女性居民以及年龄在45 - 79岁的成年男性居民,且他们拥有固定电话。
分析纳入了8197名参与者,在排除有心血管疾病病史(二级预防)的参与者后,有4161名女性和4036名男性。在前两个调查年份,阿司匹林用于一级预防的使用率保持稳定(2015年为39%,2017年为41%),但在最后一次调查(2019 - 2020年)中显著降至34%。最常见的停药原因是“医生建议”(38%的停药者),其次是“听到负面消息”,从2015年到2020年有显著增加(从4%增至29%的停药者)。
尽管有近期的研究结果和新的指南,但阿司匹林在普通人群中仍被广泛用于CVD的一级预防。这些趋势的背后是指南传播和实施缓慢、自我用药以及低成本阿司匹林广泛可得的综合作用。医生的建议是有效的,但还需要更多努力。大众媒体的影响也很大。阿司匹林指南的恰当实施需要临床医生付出更多努力。
Clinicaltrials.gov于2014年12月1日注册,NCT02607917。