• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

摒弃心理洞察,如同摒弃洗澡水。

Cleaning Up or Throwing out the Psychological Insight with the Bath Water.

机构信息

Department of Health, Social and Welfare Studies, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kjølnes Ring 56, 3918, Porsgrunn, Norway.

出版信息

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2022 Mar;56(1):308-319. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09573-w.

DOI:10.1007/s12124-020-09573-w
PMID:32809177
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8913457/
Abstract

In their article Psychology: a Giant with Feet of Clay, Zagaria, Andò and Zennaro aim to clean up the confusing and inconsistent conceptual landscape in current psychology. They find that evolutionary psychology with its dialectical focus on nature and nurture could be the unifying meta-theory that contemporary psychology is depending on in order to compete with harder sciences, such as biology and physiology. The aim of developing a unified conceptual consensus in psychology is flattering. However, the view depends on a worldview that one can reach a psychological science with objective properties through universal concepts that are non-effected by cognitive factors. My point of view is that psychological concepts carry a great deal of implicit theoretical baggage because they come with rich connotations, acquired through everyday usage. My view has got a methodological point that leads to considerations concerning the question: how psychologists are to study concepts in order to understand them? To grasp the meaning of a given concept in its context means to understand not only its literal meaning but also how it can be applied to the world and what is done by it. All these dimensions of the meaning of a concept are deeply rooted in the respective diachronic and synchronic contexts, and that is why a psychologist should be radically prepared to change her or his expectations considering the meaning of any concept under study.

摘要

在他们的文章《心理学:一块有黏土脚的巨人》中,扎加里亚、安多和泽纳罗旨在清理当前心理学中混乱和不一致的概念领域。他们发现,进化心理学以其对自然和教养的辩证关注,可能是当代心理学所依赖的统一元理论,以便与生物学和生理学等更硬的科学竞争。在心理学中发展统一的概念共识的目标是值得称赞的。然而,这种观点取决于一种世界观,即通过不受认知因素影响的普遍概念,可以达到具有客观属性的心理学科学。我的观点是,心理概念带有大量隐含的理论包袱,因为它们通过日常使用获得了丰富的内涵。我的观点有一个方法论上的观点,这导致了对以下问题的考虑:心理学家应该如何研究概念以理解它们?在上下文中理解一个给定概念的含义意味着不仅要理解其字面含义,还要理解它如何应用于世界以及它做了什么。一个概念的所有这些意义维度都深深地植根于各自的历时和共时语境中,这就是为什么心理学家应该彻底准备好根据正在研究的任何概念的意义来改变她或他的期望。

相似文献

1
Cleaning Up or Throwing out the Psychological Insight with the Bath Water.摒弃心理洞察,如同摒弃洗澡水。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2022 Mar;56(1):308-319. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09573-w.
2
The Need for Epistemological Vigilance : (Commentary to the Target Article "Psychology: A Giant With Feet of Clay", Zagaria, Andò & Zennaro).认识论警惕的必要性:(对目标文章《心理学:泥足巨人》的评论,扎加里亚、安多 & 泽纳罗)
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):677-685. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09533-4.
3
Staying with Questions and Resisting Quick Answers: Commentary on Zagaria, Andò, and Zennaro.带着问题并抵制快速给出答案:对扎加里亚、安多和泽纳罗的评论
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):572-578. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09542-3.
4
The Game of Science and Puzzles of Paradigm.科学游戏与范式之谜。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021 Mar;55(1):167-180. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09563-y.
5
Searching for an Integrative Theoretical Framework for Psychology: Evolutionary Psychology is Needed, But Not Sufficient.寻找心理学的综合理论框架:进化心理学是必要的,但并不充分。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):579-588. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09551-2.
6
A Wittgensteinian Comment on "Psychology: A Giant with Feet of Clay" A Question from Research on Creativity.对《心理学:泥足巨人》的维特根斯坦式评论——来自创造力研究的一个问题
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):651-659. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09544-1.
7
Musings about Metaphors and Models: the Need to Put Psychology Together Again.关于隐喻和模型的思考:重新整合心理学的必要性。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2022 Mar;56(1):280-296. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09575-8.
8
Moving On Our Feet: For a Nomadic Psychology.用双脚前行:关于一种游牧心理学
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):589-596. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09529-0.
9
Continuity and Discontinuity between the Psychological World and the Biological World.心理世界与生物世界之间的连续性和非连续性。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2022 Dec;56(4):954-963. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09557-w.
10
On the Foundations of Psychology: the Problem Is Grammatical, Not Theoretical.论心理学基础:问题出在语法而非理论。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021 Mar;55(1):181-188. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09569-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Essence of What it Is to Act Rationally: A Perspective on Distinctively Human Action Based on Aristotelian Philosophy and Evolutionary Science.理性行动的本质:基于亚里士多德哲学和进化科学的独特人类行动视角。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Sep;58(3):1016-1025. doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09831-1. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychology: a Giant with Feet of Clay.心理学:一个根基不稳的巨人。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):521-562. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09524-5.
2
Moving On Our Feet: For a Nomadic Psychology.用双脚前行:关于一种游牧心理学
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):589-596. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09529-0.
3
Psychological science in a postmodern context.后现代语境下的心理科学。
Am Psychol. 2001 Oct;56(10):803-13. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.56.10.803.