• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

房颤患者缺血性与非缺血性心肌病结局分析:来自 GARFIELD-AF 注册研究的报告。

Analysis of Outcomes in Ischemic vs Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report From the GARFIELD-AF Registry.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Catholic University School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile.

University of Besançon, Besançon, France.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Jun 1;4(6):526-548. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4729.

DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4729
PMID:31066873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6506904/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is commonly associated with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF), and their combination may affect treatment strategies and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the treatment strategies and 1-year clinical outcomes of antithrombotic and CHF therapies for patients with newly diagnosed AF with concomitant CHF stratified by etiology (ischemic cardiomyopathy [ICM] vs nonischemic cardiomyopathy [NICM]).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The GARFIELD-AF registry is a prospective, noninterventional registry. A total of 52 014 patients with AF were enrolled between March 2010 and August 2016. A total of 11 738 patients 18 years and older with newly diagnosed AF (≤6 weeks' duration) and at least 1 investigator-determined stroke risk factor were included. Data were analyzed from December 2017 to September 2018.

EXPOSURES

One-year follow-up rates of death, stroke/systemic embolism, and major bleeding were assessed.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Event rates per 100 person-years were estimated from the Poisson model and Cox hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

The median age of the population was 71.0 years, 22 987 of 52 013 were women (44.2%) and 31 958 of 52 014 were white (61.4%). Of 11 738 patients with CHF, 4717 (40.2%) had ICM and 7021 (59.8%) had NICM. Prescription of oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs was not balanced between groups. Oral anticoagulants with or without antiplatelet drugs were used in 2753 patients with ICM (60.1%) and 5082 patients with NICM (73.7%). Antiplatelets were prescribed alone in 1576 patients with ICM (34.4%) and 1071 patients with NICM (15.5%). Compared with patients with NICM, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (72.6% [3439] vs 60.3% [4236]) and of β blockers (63.3% [2988] vs 53.2% [3737]) was higher in patients with ICM. Rates of all-cause and cardiovascular death per 100 patient-years were significantly higher in the ICM group (all-cause death: ICM, 10.2; 95% CI, 9.2-11.1; NICM, 7.0; 95% CI, 6.4-7.6; cardiovascular death: ICM, 5.1; 95% CI, 4.5-5.9; NICM, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.5-3.4). Stroke/systemic embolism rates tended to be higher in ICM groups compared with NICM groups (ICM, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.6-2.5; NICM, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.9). Major bleeding rates were significantly higher in the ICM group (1.1; 95% CI, 0.8-1.4) compared with the NICM group (0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Patients with ICM received oral anticoagulants with or without antiplatelet drugs less frequently and antiplatelets alone more frequently than patients with NICM, but they received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers more often than patients with NICM. All-cause and cardiovascular death rates were higher in patients with ICM than patients with NICM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01090362.

摘要

重要性

充血性心力衰竭(CHF)通常与非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)相关,两者的合并可能会影响治疗策略和结局。

目的

评估新诊断的 AF 合并 CHF 患者的抗血栓和 CHF 治疗策略,根据病因(缺血性心肌病 [ICM] 与非缺血性心肌病 [NICM])分层。

设计、设置和参与者:GARFIELD-AF 登记处是一项前瞻性、非干预性登记研究。2010 年 3 月至 2016 年 8 月期间共纳入 52014 例 AF 患者。共纳入 11738 例年龄≥18 岁、新诊断的 AF(≤6 周)且至少有 1 项研究者确定的卒中危险因素的患者。数据分析于 2017 年 12 月至 2018 年 9 月进行。

暴露情况

评估 1 年死亡率、卒中/全身性栓塞和主要出血的发生率。

主要结局和测量

采用泊松模型和 Cox 风险比(HR)及 95%置信区间估计人群中每 100 人年的发生率。

结果

人群的中位年龄为 71.0 岁,52013 例患者中,22987 例(44.2%)为女性,52014 例患者中,31958 例(61.4%)为白人。在 11738 例 CHF 患者中,4717 例(40.2%)为 ICM,7021 例(59.8%)为 NICM。两组之间口服抗凝药和抗血小板药物的处方并不平衡。ICM 患者中有 2753 例(60.1%)和 NICM 患者中有 5082 例(73.7%)使用了口服抗凝药加或不加抗血小板药物。ICM 患者中有 1576 例(34.4%)和 NICM 患者中有 1071 例(15.5%)单独使用抗血小板药物。与 NICM 患者相比,ICM 患者更常使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(72.6%[3439 例]与 60.3%[4236 例])和β受体阻滞剂(63.3%[2988 例]与 53.2%[3737 例])。全因和心血管死亡的发生率在 ICM 组明显更高(全因死亡:ICM 组 10.2%(95%CI,9.2-11.1);NICM 组 7.0%(95%CI,6.4-7.6);心血管死亡:ICM 组 5.1%(95%CI,4.5-5.9);NICM 组 2.9%(95%CI,2.5-3.4))。与 NICM 组相比,ICM 组的卒中/全身性栓塞发生率有升高趋势(ICM 组 2.0%(95%CI,1.6-2.5);NICM 组 1.5%(95%CI,1.3-1.9))。主要出血的发生率在 ICM 组明显更高(1.1%(95%CI,0.8-1.4)),与 NICM 组(0.7%(95%CI,0.5-0.9))相比。

结论和相关性

与 NICM 患者相比,ICM 患者更常使用口服抗凝药加或不加抗血小板药物,而较少单独使用抗血小板药物,但 ICM 患者更常使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂。与 NICM 患者相比,ICM 患者的全因和心血管死亡发生率更高。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01090362。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Outcomes in Ischemic vs Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report From the GARFIELD-AF Registry.房颤患者缺血性与非缺血性心肌病结局分析:来自 GARFIELD-AF 注册研究的报告。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Jun 1;4(6):526-548. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4729.
2
Digoxin Initiation and Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.地高辛在射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者中的起始应用和结局。
Am J Med. 2020 Oct;133(10):1187-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.02.040. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
3
Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation and History of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights from GARFIELD-AF.新发心房颤动与急性冠状动脉综合征病史的结局:来自 GARFIELD-AF 的见解。
Am J Med. 2019 Dec;132(12):1431-1440.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
4
Stroke prevention, 1-year clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilization in patients with atrial fibrillation in France: Data from the GARFIELD-AF registry.法国心房颤动患者的卒中预防、1 年临床结局和医疗资源利用情况:来自 GARFIELD-AF 登记研究的数据。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Dec;111(12):749-757. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
5
Guideline-directed therapy at discharge in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation.心力衰竭合并心房颤动患者出院时的指南导向治疗。
Heart. 2020 Feb;106(4):292-298. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315240. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
6
Risk factors for death, stroke, and bleeding in 28,628 patients from the GARFIELD-AF registry: Rationale for comprehensive management of atrial fibrillation.来自加菲尔德房颤注册研究的28628例患者的死亡、中风和出血风险因素:房颤综合管理的基本原理
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):e0191592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191592. eCollection 2018.
7
Outcomes Associated With Oral Anticoagulants Plus Antiplatelets in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation.新发心房颤动患者使用口服抗凝药加抗血小板治疗的结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e200107. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0107.
8
Why are outcomes different for registry patients enrolled prospectively and retrospectively? Insights from the global anticoagulant registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF).为何前瞻性和回顾性登记的患者结局不同?来自 GARFIELD-AF(全球抗凝剂登记研究-房颤)的洞察。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):27-35. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx030.
9
Risk profile, antithrombotic treatment and clinical outcomes of patients in Nordic countries with atrial fibrillation - results from the GARFIELD-AF registry.北欧国家心房颤动患者的风险概况、抗栓治疗及临床结局——来自GARFIELD-AF注册研究的结果
Ann Med. 2021 Dec;53(1):485-494. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1893897.
10
Prescribing patterns of evidence-based heart failure pharmacotherapy and outcomes in the ASIAN-HF registry: a cohort study.基于证据的心力衰竭药物治疗的处方模式和 ASIAN-HF 注册研究的结果:一项队列研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Sep;6(9):e1008-e1018. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30306-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex differences in patients with working diagnosis of myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA).工作诊断为非阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死(MINOCA)患者的性别差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 22;15(1):2764. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87121-5.
2
Urinary Dickkopf-3 as a Potential Marker for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Decline in Patients With Heart Failure.尿Dickkopf-3作为心力衰竭患者估计肾小球滤过率下降的潜在标志物。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Dec 3;13(23):e036637. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036637. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
3
The Impact of Coronary Ischemia Assessment on Outcomes in Those With Scar-Dependent Ventricular Tachycardia.冠状动脉缺血评估对瘢痕依赖性室性心动过速患者预后的影响。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan;36(1):201-211. doi: 10.1111/jce.16495. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
4
Molecular characterization of PANoptosis-related genes in chronic kidney disease.慢性肾脏病中 PANoptosis 相关基因的分子特征。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 28;19(10):e0312696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312696. eCollection 2024.
5
Ischemic cardiomyopathy: epidemiology, pathophysiology, outcomes, and therapeutic options.缺血性心肌病:流行病学、病理生理学、结局和治疗选择。
Heart Fail Rev. 2024 Jan;29(1):287-299. doi: 10.1007/s10741-023-10377-4. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
6
Paving the way for patient centricity in real-world evidence (RWE): Qualitative interviews to identify considerations for wider implementation of patient-reported outcomes in RWE generation.为真实世界证据(RWE)中的以患者为中心铺平道路:定性访谈以确定在生成RWE时更广泛实施患者报告结果的考量因素。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 14;9(9):e20157. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20157. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Different expression and prognostic value of troponin in ischemic cardiomyopathy and non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.肌钙蛋白在缺血性心肌病和非缺血性扩张型心肌病中的不同表达及其预后价值。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jul 3;28(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01169-5.
8
Congestion and Use of Diuretics in Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies: a Practical Guide.心力衰竭和心肌病中的充血与利尿剂使用:实用指南
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 May;25(5):411-420. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01865-y. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
9
D-dimer and outcomes in hospitalized heart failure patients across the ejection fraction phenotypes.D-二聚体与射血分数表型住院心力衰竭患者结局的关系。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Oct;9(5):3060-3070. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14049. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
10
Preliminary development of recommendations for the inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical quality registries.患者报告结局测量纳入临床质量登记研究的建议的初步制定。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07657-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of implementation interventions in improving physician adherence to guideline recommendations in heart failure: a systematic review.实施干预措施在提高医生对心力衰竭指南建议的依从性方面的有效性:一项系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 6;8(3):e017765. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017765.
2
Heart Failure as a Risk Factor for Stroke.心力衰竭作为中风的一个风险因素。
J Stroke. 2018 Jan;20(1):33-45. doi: 10.5853/jos.2017.02810. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
3
Risk factors for death, stroke, and bleeding in 28,628 patients from the GARFIELD-AF registry: Rationale for comprehensive management of atrial fibrillation.来自加菲尔德房颤注册研究的28628例患者的死亡、中风和出血风险因素:房颤综合管理的基本原理
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):e0191592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191592. eCollection 2018.
4
Characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation prescribed antiplatelet monotherapy compared with those on anticoagulants: insights from the GARFIELD-AF registry.比较服用抗血小板单药治疗与抗凝治疗的房颤患者的特征:来自 GARFIELD-AF 登记研究的结果。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Feb 7;39(6):464-473. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx730.
5
Pathophysiological and therapeutic implications in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure.心房颤动和心力衰竭患者的病理生理和治疗意义。
Heart Fail Rev. 2018 Jan;23(1):27-36. doi: 10.1007/s10741-017-9657-9.
6
Evolving quality standards for large-scale registries: the GARFIELD-AF experience.不断发展的大规模注册研究质量标准:GARFIELD-AF 经验。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017 Apr 1;3(2):114-122. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcw058.
7
The Population-Based Long-Term Impact of Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Therapies in Low-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.抗凝和抗血小板治疗对低风险房颤患者的基于人群的长期影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;120(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.256. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
8
Medication regimen complexity in ambulatory older adults with heart failure.门诊老年心力衰竭患者的药物治疗方案复杂性
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Apr 12;12:679-686. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S130832. eCollection 2017.
9
Risk of stroke in chronic heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction, but without atrial fibrillation: analysis of the CHARM-Preserved and I-Preserve trials.射血分数保留的慢性心力衰竭患者中无房颤但有卒中风险:CHARMPreserved 和 I-Preserve 试验分析。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Mar 7;38(10):742-750. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw509.
10
Comparative effectiveness of transitional care services in patients discharged from the hospital with heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.从医院出院的心衰患者过渡性护理服务的效果比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Nov;19(11):1427-1443. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.765. Epub 2017 Feb 24.