From bench to bedside: 3D reconstruction and printing as a valuable tool for the chest wall surgeon.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The development of computer-aided design/manufacturing and digital image technology shows promise to revolutionize several medical and surgical fields. In this context, we propose a different approach for minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) including preoperative planning, ambulatory template fitting, and implant customization.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data on 130 consecutive patients who underwent a novel process of implant customization for MIRPE between November 2015 and September 2019 at our institution. This process consisted of: 1) preoperative planning using 3D computed tomography scan reconstruction and 3D printing of the implant template, 2) an ambulatory fitting session with the template, and 3) manufacture of a custom made, prebent, metallic implant based on the 3D printed templates. We described the process in detail and analyzed the "implant-deformity" match, need for rebending, modification of the curvature or shape of the pectus implant intraoperatively, and accuracy of the number of bars planned preoperatively.

RESULTS

Preoperative planning including 3D reconstruction and printing resulted in a 92.3% optimal "implant-deformity" anatomic match. Minimal rebending without flipping of the implants was required in 5.4% of the patients. In two cases (1.5%), the implants were too short, and they tended to sink into the intercostal space, and in one case (0.8%), the patient's chest was extremely asymmetric, and the implant had to be removed and rebent intraoperatively. The number of implants planned preoperatively was precise in 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we demonstrated that minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum assisted by preoperative planning, ambulatory template fitting, and implant customization enables an excellent anatomic match, leading to minimal rebending, and avoiding implant flipping or removal after retrosternal passage as well as accuracy in the number of bars programmed preoperatively.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prospective registry.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.