Gerner B T, Barth E, Albrektsson T, Rönningen H, Solheim L F, Wie H
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Oslo, Norway.
Scand J Dent Res. 1988 Apr;96(2):143-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1988.tb01421.x.
Titanium and TCP-coated implants were compared after insertion in the canine iliac crest. Observation time was 14 wk. Evaluation included pull-out tests, energy dispersive X-ray analysis, and histologic examination of in situ, undemineralized implants. The TCP-coated implants were more firmly attached to bone than were the titanium implants. The calcium/phosphorus ratios around the titanium implants were higher than around the TCP-coated implants. Both types of implants were closely surrounded by bone after a 14-wk implantation.
将钛涂层和磷酸三钙（TCP）涂层植入物植入犬髂嵴后进行比较。观察时间为14周。评估包括拔出试验、能量色散X射线分析以及对原位未脱矿植入物的组织学检查。TCP涂层植入物比钛植入物与骨的附着更牢固。钛植入物周围的钙/磷比值高于TCP涂层植入物周围。两种类型的植入物在植入14周后均被骨紧密包围。
