• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管内超声指导下与未指导下冠状动脉支架置入术的长期疗效对比

Long-Term Outcomes of Coronary Stenting With and Without Use of Intravascular Ultrasound.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.

Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation Center (CADRE), Iowa City VA Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Aug 24;13(16):1880-1890. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.052.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.052
PMID:32819477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7444477/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to explore if intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) use in real-world patients is associated with improved long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

The benefit of IVUS use with PCI in real world is uncertain.

METHODS

We identified Medicare patients who underwent PCI from 2009 to 2017 and evaluated the association of IVUS use with long-term risk of mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization. We used propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting to adjust for baseline characteristics. To account for hospital effects, patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI were matched to non-IVUS patients in the same hospital and year. Sensitivity analyses comparing outcomes with and without IVUS in stable coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome, PCI with bare-metal stents and drug-eluting stents, complex and noncomplex PCI, and facilities with 1% to 5%, 5% to 10%, and >10% IVUS use were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, IVUS was used in 5.6% of all PCI patients (105,787 out of 1,877,177 patients). Patients with IVUS-guided PCI had a higher prevalence of most comorbidities. In the propensity matched analysis, IVUS-guided PCI was associated with lower 1-year mortality (11.5% vs. 12.3%), MI (4.9% vs. 5.2%), and repeat revascularization (6.1% vs. 6.7%) (p < 0.001 for all). In inverse probability weighting analysis with a median follow-up of 3.7 years (interquartile range: 1.7 to 6.4 years), IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a lower risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.903; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.885 to 0.922), MI (aHR: 0.899; 95% CI: 0.893 to 0.904), and repeat revascularization (aHR: 0.893; 95% CI: 0.887 to 0.898) (p < 0.001 for all). These findings were consistent in all subgroups in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In this contemporary U.S. Medicare cohort, the use of IVUS guidance in PCI remains low. Use of IVUS is associated with lower long-term mortality, MI, and repeat revascularization.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨血管内超声(IVUS)在真实世界患者中的应用是否与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的长期预后改善相关。

背景

IVUS 在真实世界中联合 PCI 的获益尚不确定。

方法

我们确定了 2009 年至 2017 年间接受 PCI 的医疗保险患者,并评估了 IVUS 应用与长期死亡率、心肌梗死(MI)和再次血运重建风险之间的关系。我们使用倾向评分匹配和逆概率加权法调整基线特征。为了考虑医院效应,在同一医院和年份,对接受 IVUS 指导的 PCI 患者进行了与非 IVUS 患者的匹配。在稳定性冠状动脉疾病和急性冠状动脉综合征、裸金属支架和药物洗脱支架的 PCI、复杂和非复杂 PCI 以及 IVUS 使用率为 1%5%、5%10%和>10%的设施中,进行了比较 IVUS 与无 IVUS 治疗的结局的敏感性分析。

结果

总体而言,IVUS 在所有 PCI 患者中的使用率为 5.6%(1877177 例患者中有 105787 例)。接受 IVUS 指导 PCI 的患者更常见大多数合并症。在倾向评分匹配分析中,IVUS 指导 PCI 与 1 年死亡率(11.5% vs. 12.3%)、MI(4.9% vs. 5.2%)和再次血运重建(6.1% vs. 6.7%)较低相关(均<0.001)。在中位随访 3.7 年(四分位距:1.76.4 年)的逆概率加权分析中,IVUS 指导 PCI 与死亡率降低相关(校正后的危险比[aHR]:0.903;95%置信区间[CI]:0.8850.922)、MI(aHR:0.899;95%CI:0.8930.904)和再次血运重建(aHR:0.893;95%CI:0.8870.898)相关(均<0.001)。在所有亚组的敏感性分析中,这些发现均一致。

结论

在这项美国当代医疗保险队列研究中,PCI 中 IVUS 的使用仍然较低。IVUS 的使用与较低的长期死亡率、MI 和再次血运重建相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a5/7444477/855ca815603a/nihms-1591971-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a5/7444477/c82e45dd45b6/nihms-1591971-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a5/7444477/8fe17c338351/nihms-1591971-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a5/7444477/855ca815603a/nihms-1591971-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a5/7444477/c82e45dd45b6/nihms-1591971-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a5/7444477/8fe17c338351/nihms-1591971-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87a5/7444477/855ca815603a/nihms-1591971-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-Term Outcomes of Coronary Stenting With and Without Use of Intravascular Ultrasound.血管内超声指导下与未指导下冠状动脉支架置入术的长期疗效对比
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Aug 24;13(16):1880-1890. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.052.
2
Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Complex Procedures.血管内超声指导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对复杂手术患者长期临床结局的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 8;12(7):607-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.227. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
3
Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance Is Associated With Better Outcome in Patients Undergoing Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting Compared With Angiography Guidance Alone.血管内超声指导与单独血管造影指导相比,可改善行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的无保护左主干患者的预后。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;10(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004813.
4
The Role of Vascular Imaging in Guiding Routine Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Bare Metal Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent Trials.血管成像在常规经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的作用:金属裸支架和药物洗脱支架试验的荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2015 Dec;33(6):360-6. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12160.
5
Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: 5-Year Follow-Up of the IVUS-XPL Randomized Trial.血管内超声指导药物洗脱支架置入的效果:IVUS-XPL 随机试验的 5 年随访结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jan 13;13(1):62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.09.033.
6
Comparison Between Optical Frequency Domain Imaging and Intravascular Ultrasound for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidance in Biolimus A9-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Randomized MISTIC-1 Non-Inferiority Trial.光学相干断层成像与血管内超声在生物可吸收支架中应用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:一项随机 MISTIC-1 非劣效性试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;13(11):e009314. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009314. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
7
Intravascular ultrasound to guide percutaneous coronary interventions: an evidence-based analysis.血管内超声引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(12):1-97. Epub 2006 Apr 1.
8
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With and Without Intravascular Ultrasound for Patients With Complex Lesions: Utilization, Mortality, and Target Vessel Revascularization.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗伴或不伴血管内超声用于复杂病变患者:使用率、死亡率和靶血管血运重建。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun;15(6):e011687. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011687. Epub 2022 May 11.
9
Impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention on long-term clinical outcomes in a real world population.血管内超声指导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对真实世界人群长期临床结局的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;81(3):407-16. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23279. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
10
Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with unstable angina and complex coronary artery true bifurcation lesions.血管内超声引导下药物洗脱支架植入术与不稳定型心绞痛和复杂冠状动脉真性分叉病变患者临床预后的改善相关。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Nov;34(11):1685-1696. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1393-2. Epub 2018 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation Between Intravascular Ultrasound Minimum Luminal Area and Quantitative Minimum Luminal Area in Intermediate Coronary Lesions.冠状动脉中度病变中血管内超声最小管腔面积与定量最小管腔面积的相关性
Cureus. 2025 Apr 8;17(4):e81924. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81924. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States: Results from Big Data Analysis.美国非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者血管内成像引导与血管造影引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:大数据分析结果
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Apr 17;12(4):161. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12040161.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Intravascular modality-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction.血管内模态引导与血管造影引导的急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 1;95(4):696-703. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28359. Epub 2019 May 27.
2
Real-world use of intravascular ultrasound in Japan: a report from contemporary multicenter PCI registry.血管内超声在日本的实际应用:来自当代多中心经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册研究的报告
Heart Vessels. 2019 Nov;34(11):1728-1739. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01427-9. Epub 2019 May 25.
3
Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Complex Procedures.
Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease on Maintenance Dialysis.
维持性透析的终末期肾病患者的血管内成像引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
JACC Asia. 2024 Nov 26;5(1):28-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.10.006. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
CVIT 2025 clinical expert consensus document on intravascular ultrasound.《血管内超声CVIT 2025临床专家共识文件》
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025 Apr;40(2):211-225. doi: 10.1007/s12928-025-01090-0. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
5
Quantitative Coronary Angiography Guidance for Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Narrative Review.药物洗脱支架植入的定量冠状动脉造影指导:一项叙述性综述。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 17;7(12):e70286. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70286. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Cutting-edge progress of intravascular ultrasound in lower-extremity vascular interventions.血管内超声在下肢血管介入治疗中的前沿进展。
Ultrasonography. 2025 Jan;44(1):5-18. doi: 10.14366/usg.24148. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
7
Enhancing Coronary Intervention Outcomes Using Intravascular Ultrasound: Analysis of Long-Term Benefits in a Japanese Multicenter Registry.使用血管内超声改善冠状动脉介入治疗结果:日本多中心注册研究的长期益处分析
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Oct 24;3(1):101190. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101190. eCollection 2024 Jan.
8
Association Between Intracoronary Imaging During PCI and Clinical Outcomes in a Real-World US Medicare Population.美国医疗保险实际参保人群中经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间冠状动脉内成像与临床结局的关联
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Dec 5;2(2):100556. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100556. eCollection 2023 Mar-Apr.
9
Accuracy of IVUS-Based Machine Learning Segmentation Assessment of Coronary Artery Dimensions and Balloon Sizing.基于血管内超声的机器学习分割对冠状动脉尺寸和球囊大小评估的准确性
JACC Adv. 2023 Aug 22;2(7):100564. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100564. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Long-term clinical outcomes of image-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究:影像引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死的长期临床结局。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 5;19(6):e0304843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304843. eCollection 2024.
血管内超声指导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对复杂手术患者长期临床结局的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 8;12(7):607-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.227. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
4
'Ten commandments' for the 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南的“十诫”
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):79-80. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy855.
5
Clinical Benefit of IVUS Guidance for Coronary Stenting: The ULTIMATE Step Toward Definitive Evidence?血管内超声引导冠状动脉支架置入术的临床益处:通向确凿证据的最终步骤?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 18;72(24):3138-3141. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.029.
6
Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: The ULTIMATE Trial.血管内超声与血管造影指导药物洗脱支架置入术:ULTIMATE 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 18;72(24):3126-3137. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
7
Impact and trends of intravascular imaging in diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in inpatients in the United States.美国住院患者诊断性冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入术中血管内影像学的影响和趋势。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 15;92(6):E410-E415. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27673. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
8
Intravascular Ultrasound for Guidance and Optimization of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.血管内超声用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的指导与优化
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2018 Jul;7(3):315-328. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
9
Temporal Trends in Inpatient Use of Intravascular Imaging Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States.美国接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者住院期间血管内成像使用情况的时间趋势
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 May 14;11(9):913-915. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.254.
10
Temporal trends in percutaneous coronary interventions thru the drug eluting stent era: Insights from 18,641 procedures performed over 12-year period.药物洗脱支架时代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的时间趋势:12 年期间完成的 18641 例手术的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct 1;92(4):E262-E270. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27375. Epub 2017 Oct 13.