Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Alcohol Research Group, Emeryville, California, USA.
Subst Abus. 2021;42(4):559-568. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2020.1803176. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
In the United States, alcohol use disorder (AUD) is common and costly but substantially undertreated. Rurality is an important determinant of health that may influence receipt of evidence-based alcohol-related care. In a large, national sample of Veterans Health Administration (VA) patients with AUD with documented and non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, or non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity, we examine whether meeting national Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) quality measures for specialty addictions care and receiving evidence-based medications for AUD differs across patients living in urban, large rural, and small rural areas. VA electronic health record data were used to identify all patients with AUD documented in Fiscal Year 2012. Rurality was measured using a three-category rural and urban commuting area (RUCA) classification linked to patient zip code. Logistic regression models with clustered standard errors-iteratively adjusted for hypothesized confounders-were used to estimate the likelihood and marginal probabilities of receiving care for patients living in small and large rural areas, relative to urban areas. Primary outcomes included HEDIS initiation (any visit within 14 days of initial AUD visit after a 60-day period of no treatment), HEDIS engagement (2 or more AUD visits within 30 days of HEDIS initiation visit) and having any filled prescription for AUD medications (naltrexone, disulfiram, acamprosate, or topiramate). For all outcomes, patients living in large and small rural areas had a lower likelihood of receiving evidence-based AUD treatment than patients living in urban areas (all -values < 0.05); differences in marginal probabilities across groups were relatively small. In this national sample of VA patients with AUD, those living in more rural areas were less likely to receive evidence-based treatment for AUD than those living in urban areas. Further research is needed to investigate strategies to increase receipt of specialty care and pharmacotherapy in more rural areas.
在美国,酒精使用障碍(AUD)很常见且代价高昂,但治疗严重不足。农村地区是影响获得循证酒精相关治疗的重要健康决定因素。在一个大型的、全国性的退伍军人健康管理局(VA)酒精使用障碍患者样本中,这些患者有记录的非西班牙裔黑人、西班牙裔或非西班牙裔白人种族/民族,我们研究了在接受过专门治疗酒精障碍的医疗保健效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)质量措施和接受过酒精使用障碍循证药物治疗的患者中,居住在城市、大农村和小农村地区的患者之间是否存在差异。VA 电子健康记录数据用于确定 2012 财政年度记录的所有 AUD 患者。农村地区使用与患者邮政编码相关的三类别农村和城市通勤区(RUCA)分类来衡量。使用具有聚类标准误差的逻辑回归模型-迭代调整假设的混杂因素-估计居住在小农村和大农村地区的患者接受治疗的可能性和边际概率,与城市地区相比。主要结局包括 HEDIS 开始(在初始 AUD 就诊后 60 天无治疗期间的任何 14 天内就诊)、HEDIS 参与(在 HEDIS 起始就诊后 30 天内进行 2 次或更多次 AUD 就诊)和有任何 AUD 药物处方(纳曲酮、双硫仑、阿坎酸或托吡酯)。对于所有结局,与居住在城市地区的患者相比,居住在大农村和小农村地区的患者接受循证 AUD 治疗的可能性较低(所有 -值<0.05);组间边际概率的差异相对较小。在这个全国性的 VA 酒精使用障碍患者样本中,居住在较农村地区的患者比居住在城市地区的患者接受循证 AUD 治疗的可能性较低。需要进一步研究以探讨在较农村地区增加获得专业护理和药物治疗的策略。