Suppr超能文献

退伍军人健康管理局中患有酒精使用障碍的患者在成瘾治疗的开始和参与方面的种族/族裔差异。

Racial/ethnic differences in initiation of and engagement with addictions treatment among patients with alcohol use disorders in the veterans health administration.

作者信息

Bensley Kara M, Harris Alex H S, Gupta Shalini, Rubinsky Anna D, Jones-Webb Rhonda, Glass Joseph E, Williams Emily C

机构信息

Department of Health Services, Magnuson Health Sciences Center, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Room H-680, Box 357660, Seattle, WA, 98195-7660, USA; Veterans Health Administration (VA), Denver Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered Value Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S. Columbian Way, Mailstop S-152, Seattle, WA 98108, USA.

Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Center for Innovation to Implementation, 795 Willow Road (152-MPD), Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.

出版信息

J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Feb;73:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Specialty addictions treatment can improve outcomes for patients with alcohol use disorders (AUD). Thus, initiation of and engagement with specialty addictions treatment are considered quality care for patients with AUD. Previous studies have demonstrated racial/ethnic differences in alcohol-related care but whether differences exist in initiation of and engagement with specialty addictions treatment among patients with clinically recognized alcohol use disorders is unknown. We investigated racial/ethnic variation in initiation of and engagement with specialty addictions treatment in a national sample of Black, Hispanic, and White patients with clinically recognized alcohol use disorders (AUD) from the US Veterans Health Administration (VA).

METHODS

National VA data were extracted for all Black, Hispanic, and White patients with a diagnosed AUD during fiscal year 2012. Mixed effects regression models estimated the odds of two measures of initiation (an initial visit within 180days of diagnosis; and initiation defined consistent with Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) as a documented visit ≤14days after index visit or inpatient admission), and three established measures of treatment engagement (≥3 visits within first month after initiation; ≥2 visits in each of the first 3months after initiation; and ≥2 visits within 30days of HEDIS initiation) for Black and Hispanic relative to White patients after adjustment for facility- and patient-level characteristics.

RESULTS

Among 302,406 patients with AUD, 30% (90,879) initiated treatment within 180days of diagnosis (38% Black, 32% Hispanic, and 27% White). Black patients were more likely to initiate treatment than Whites for both measures of initiation [odds ratio (OR) for initiation: 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-1.4; OR for HEDIS initiation: 1.1, 95% CI: 1.1-1.1]. Hispanic patients were more likely than White patients to initiate treatment within 180days (OR: 1.2, 95% CI 1.2-1.3) but HEDIS initiation did not differ between Hispanic and White patients. Engagement results varied depending on the measure but was more likely for Black patients relative to White for all measures (OR for engagement in first month: 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0-1.1; OR for engagement in first three months: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.2; OR for HEDIS measure: 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0-1.1), and did not differ between Hispanic and White patients.

CONCLUSIONS

After accounting for facility- and patient-level characteristics, Black and Hispanic patients with AUD were more likely than Whites to initiate specialty addictions treatment, and Black patients were more likely than Whites to engage. Research is needed to understand underlying mechanisms and whether differences in initiation of and engagement with care influence health outcomes.

摘要

目的

专科成瘾治疗可改善酒精使用障碍(AUD)患者的治疗效果。因此,启动并参与专科成瘾治疗被视为AUD患者的优质护理。既往研究已证实酒精相关护理存在种族/民族差异,但临床上已确诊酒精使用障碍的患者在启动并参与专科成瘾治疗方面是否存在差异尚不清楚。我们在美国退伍军人健康管理局(VA)的一个全国性样本中,调查了临床确诊为酒精使用障碍(AUD)的黑人、西班牙裔和白人患者在启动并参与专科成瘾治疗方面的种族/民族差异。

方法

提取了2012财年所有诊断为AUD的黑人、西班牙裔和白人患者的VA全国数据。混合效应回归模型估计了两种启动指标(诊断后180天内的首次就诊;以及按照医疗保健有效性数据和信息集(HEDIS)定义的启动,即索引就诊或住院入院后≤14天的有记录就诊)的比值比,以及三种既定的治疗参与指标(启动后第一个月内≥3次就诊;启动后前3个月内每月≥2次就诊;以及HEDIS启动后30天内≥2次就诊),在对机构和患者层面特征进行调整后,比较黑人和西班牙裔患者与白人患者的情况。

结果

在302,406例AUD患者中,30%(90,879例)在诊断后180天内启动治疗(黑人38%,西班牙裔32%,白人27%)。对于两种启动指标,黑人患者比白人患者更有可能启动治疗[启动的比值比(OR):1.4,95%置信区间(CI)1.4 - 1.4;HEDIS启动的OR:1.1,95% CI:1.1 - 1.1]。西班牙裔患者比白人患者更有可能在180天内启动治疗(OR:1.2,95% CI 1.2 - 1.3),但西班牙裔和白人患者在HEDIS启动方面没有差异。参与结果因指标而异,但所有指标中黑人患者相对于白人更有可能参与(第一个月参与的OR:1.1,95% CI:1.0 - 1.1;前三个月参与的OR:1.2,95% CI:1.1 - 1.2;HEDIS指标的OR:1.1,95% CI:1.0 - 1.1),西班牙裔和白人患者之间没有差异。

结论

在考虑机构和患者层面特征后,患有AUD的黑人和西班牙裔患者比白人患者更有可能启动专科成瘾治疗,且黑人患者比白人患者更有可能参与治疗。需要开展研究以了解潜在机制,以及治疗启动和参与方面的差异是否会影响健康结局。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验