Kunc Michał, Popęda Marta, Niemira Magdalena, Szałkowska Anna, Bieńkowski Michał, Pęksa Rafał, Łacko Aleksandra, Radecka Barbara S, Braun Marcin, Pikiel Joanna, Litwiniuk Maria, Pogoda Katarzyna, Iżycka-Świeszewska Ewa, Krętowski Adam, Żaczek Anna J, Biernat Wojciech, Senkus-Konefka Elżbieta
Department of Pathomorphology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland.
Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Aug 20;10(9):617. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090617.
Estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptors and HER2 are crucial in the assessment of breast cancer specimens due to their prognostic and predictive significance. Single hormone receptor-positive breast cancers are less common and their clinical course is less favorable than ER(+)/PgR(+) tumors. Their molecular features, especially microRNA (miRNA) profiles, have not been investigated to date. Tumor specimens from 36 chemonaive breast cancer patients with known ER and PgR status (18 ER(+)/PgR(-) and 18 ER(-)/PgR(+) cases) were enrolled to the study. The expression of 829 miRNAs was evaluated with nCounter Human v3 miRNA expression Assay (NanoString). miRNAs differentiating between ER/PgR/HER2 phenotypes were selected based on fold change (FC) calculated for the mean normalized counts of each probe in compared groups. The differences were estimated with Student's -test or Two-Way ANOVA (considering also the HER2 status). The results were validated using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. Following quality control of raw data, fourcases were excluded due to low sample quality, leaving 14 ER(+)/PgR(-) and 18 ER(-)/PgR(+) cases. After correction for multiple comparisons, we did not find miRNA signature differentiating between ER(-)/PgR(+) and ER(+)/PgR(-) breast cancers. However, a trend for differing expression (-value ≤ 0.05; FDR > 0.2; ANOVA) in eight miRNAs was observed. The ER(+)/PgR(-) group demonstrated elevated levels of four miRNAs-miR-30a-5p, miR-29c-3p, miR-141-3p and miR-423-5p-while the ER(-)/PgR(+) tumors were enriched in another four miRNAs-miR-514b-5p, miR-424-5p, miR-495-3p, and miR-92a-3p. For one of the miRNAs-miR-29c-3p-the association with the ER(+)/PgR(-) phenotype was confirmed in the TCGA cohort (-value = 0.024; -test). HER2 amplification/overexpression in the NanoString cohort was related to significant differences observed in 33 miRNA expression levels (FDR ≤ 0.2; ANOVA). The association with HER2 status was confirmed in the TCGA cohort for four miRNAs (miR-1180-3p, miR-223-3p, miR-30d-5p, and miR-195-5p). The main differences in miRNA expression amongst single hormone receptor-positive tumors were identified according to their HER2 status. However, ER(+)/PgR(-) cases tended to express higher levels of miRNAs associated with ER-positivity (miR-30a-5p, miR-29c-3p, miR-141-3p), whereas ER(-)/PgR(+) cancers showed elevated levels of miRNAs characteristic for double- and triple-negative tumors (miR-92a-3p, miR-424-5p). Further studies are necessary to comprehensively analyze miRNA signatures characteristic of ER(-)/PgR(+) and ER(+)/PgR(-) tumors.
雌激素(ER)、孕激素(PgR)受体以及人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)因其预后和预测意义,在乳腺癌标本评估中至关重要。单激素受体阳性乳腺癌较为少见,其临床病程相较于ER(+)/PgR(+)肿瘤更不理想。迄今为止,尚未对其分子特征,尤其是微小RNA(miRNA)谱进行研究。本研究纳入了36例初治乳腺癌患者的肿瘤标本,这些患者的ER和PgR状态已知(18例ER(+)/PgR(-)和18例ER(-)/PgR(+)病例)。采用nCounter Human v3 miRNA表达分析(NanoString)评估829种miRNA的表达。根据比较组中每个探针的平均标准化计数计算的倍数变化(FC),选择能够区分ER/PgR/HER2表型的miRNA。差异通过学生t检验或双向方差分析进行估计(同时考虑HER2状态)。结果使用癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)数据集进行验证。在对原始数据进行质量控制后,由于样本质量低排除了4例,最终留下14例ER(+)/PgR(-)和18例ER(-)/PgR(+)病例。在进行多重比较校正后,我们未发现能够区分ER(-)/PgR(+)和ER(+)/PgR(-)乳腺癌的miRNA特征。然而,观察到8种miRNA存在表达差异趋势(P值≤0.05;FDR>0.2;方差分析)。ER(+)/PgR(-)组中4种miRNA(miR-30a-5p、miR-29c-3p、miR-141-3p和miR-423-5p)水平升高,而ER(-)/PgR(+)肿瘤中另外4种miRNA(miR-514b-5p、miR-424-5p、miR-495-3p和miR-92a-3p)富集。对于其中一种miRNA——miR-29c-3p,在TCGA队列中证实了其与ER(+)/PgR(-)表型的关联(P值 = 0.024;t检验)。NanoString队列中的HER2扩增/过表达与33种miRNA表达水平的显著差异相关(FDR≤0.2;方差分析)。在TCGA队列中,4种miRNA(miR-1180-3p、miR-223-3p、miR-30d-5p和miR-195-5p)与HER2状态的关联得到证实。单激素受体阳性肿瘤之间miRNA表达的主要差异根据其HER2状态确定。然而,ER(+)/PgR(-)病例倾向于表达更高水平与ER阳性相关的miRNA(miR-30a-5p、miR-29c-3p、miR-141-3p),而ER(-)/PgR(+)癌症中双阴性和三阴性肿瘤特征性的miRNA(miR-92a-3p、miR-424-5p)水平升高。有必要进一步研究以全面分析ER(-)/PgR(+)和ER(+)/PgR(-)肿瘤特征性的miRNA特征。