Suppr超能文献

精神分裂症谱系障碍患者戒烟的药物干预:系统评价、荟萃分析和网状荟萃分析

Pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation among people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Siskind Dan J, Wu Brian T, Wong Tommy T, Firth Joseph, Kisely Steve

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;7(9):762-774. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30261-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

People with schizophrenia have higher rates of smoking than the general population, and lower quit rates. Several randomised controlled trials have investigated the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation over the past 20 years. We did a systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analysis of smoking abstinence to guide decision making in offering pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from inception to Sept 30, 2019, for randomised controlled trials of varenicline, bupropion, and nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders or psychotic disorders who were smokers at the time of study recruitment. Data were extracted from published studies on smoking abstinence outcomes and psychotic symptoms. We did pairwise and network meta-analyses for the primary outcome of smoking abstinence. Sensitivity analyses were done on study inclusion criteria, duration, quality, and location. This study is registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews PROSPERO, CRD42018102343.

FINDINGS

A total of 15 111 records were identified by the database searches, and 163 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. 145 articles were then excluded for several reasons including insufficient data, or abstracts published in later studies, and 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the pairwise meta-analyses, four studies with 394 participants assessed varenicline (RR 3·75, 95% CI 1·96-7·19, p<0·0001; I=0%), four studies with bupropion and 292 participants (RR 3·40, 95% CI 1·58-7·34, p=0·0002; I=0%), and three studies with 561 participants assessed nicotine replacement therapy (RR 4·27, 95% CI 1·71-10·65, p=0·0002; I=0%). All three treatments were deemed superior to placebo. In the network meta-analysis, varenicline was superior to bupropion (RR 2·02, 95% CI 1·04-3·93; p=0·038) but no significant difference was found between varenicline and nicotine replacement therapy, or bupropion and nicotine replacement therapy. No agents were associated with changes in psychiatric symptoms, but varenicline was associated with higher rates of nausea than was placebo.

INTERPRETATION

We found evidence to support use of pharmacological agents for smoking cessation for people with psychosis. Varenicline might be superior to bupropion; however, additional direct testing and combination trials of pharmacological agents for smoking cessation are required to inform clinical decision making for people with psychosis.

FUNDING

None.

摘要

背景

精神分裂症患者的吸烟率高于普通人群,戒烟率则较低。在过去20年中,多项随机对照试验探究了药物干预对戒烟的有效性。我们进行了一项系统评价以及成对和网状荟萃分析,以指导为精神分裂症谱系障碍患者提供戒烟药物干预的决策制定。

方法

我们系统检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、PsycINFO以及中国知网,检索时间跨度从建库至2019年9月30日,旨在查找有关伐尼克兰、安非他酮和尼古丁替代疗法用于精神分裂症谱系障碍或精神病性障碍吸烟者戒烟的随机对照试验。从已发表的研究中提取有关戒烟结果和精神病性症状的数据。我们对戒烟这一主要结局进行了成对和网状荟萃分析。对研究纳入标准、持续时间、质量和地点进行了敏感性分析。本研究已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42018102343。

结果

通过数据库检索共识别出15111条记录,对163篇全文文章进行了资格评估。随后,因数据不足或后期研究发表的摘要等多种原因排除了145篇文章,18项研究纳入荟萃分析。在成对荟萃分析中,四项研究共394名参与者评估了伐尼克兰(风险比3.75,95%置信区间1.96 - 7.19,p<0.0001;I² = 0%),四项研究共292名参与者评估了安非他酮(风险比3.40,95%置信区间1.58 - 7.34,p = 0.0002;I² = 0%),三项研究共561名参与者评估了尼古丁替代疗法(风险比4.27,95%置信区间1.71 - 10.65,p = 0.0002;I² = 0%)。所有三种治疗均被认为优于安慰剂。在网状荟萃分析中,伐尼克兰优于安非他酮(风险比2.02,95%置信区间1.04 - 3.93;p = 0.038),但伐尼克兰与尼古丁替代疗法之间、安非他酮与尼古丁替代疗法之间未发现显著差异。没有药物与精神症状变化相关,但伐尼克兰导致恶心的发生率高于安慰剂。

解读

我们发现有证据支持使用药物帮助精神病患者戒烟。伐尼克兰可能优于安非他酮;然而,需要进行更多关于戒烟药物的直接试验和联合试验,以为精神病患者的临床决策提供依据。

资金来源

无。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验