Sigelman Carol K, Glaser Sara E
George Washington University.
Cogn Dev. 2019 Oct-Dec;52. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.100809. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
To advance the study of children's knowledge and understanding of disease, we devised a methodology for assessing key features of intuitive theories laid out by Wellman and Gelman (1998). We then assessed a disease-relevant biological ontology, causal propositions involving unobservables, and coherence in explanations of influenza offered by children aged 8 to 13. Use of disease-relevant terms and mention of propositions in a biological theory of flu causality, although not coherence or connectedness of ideas, increased with age. Measures were moderately correlated with one another and with a traditional Piagetian measure of level of disease understanding, each contributing uniquely to the characterization of children's thinking. In multiple regression analyses, scores were highest for older children, Latino/minority children, and children of more educated parents with other factors controlled. Specific gaps in children's intuitive theories are identified to guide theory-based interventions aimed at helping children understand and protect themselves from infectious diseases.
为了推动对儿童疾病知识和理解的研究,我们设计了一种方法,用于评估韦尔曼和盖尔曼(1998年)提出的直觉理论的关键特征。然后,我们评估了与疾病相关的生物本体论、涉及不可观察事物的因果命题,以及8至13岁儿童对流感解释的连贯性。与疾病相关术语的使用以及在流感因果关系生物学理论中对命题的提及,虽然不是思想的连贯性或关联性,但随着年龄的增长而增加。各项测量之间以及与传统皮亚杰式疾病理解水平测量之间存在适度的相关性,每项测量都对儿童思维特征的刻画有独特贡献。在多元回归分析中,在控制其他因素的情况下,年龄较大的儿童、拉丁裔/少数族裔儿童以及父母受教育程度较高的儿童得分最高。确定了儿童直觉理论中的具体差距,以指导基于理论的干预措施,旨在帮助儿童理解并保护自己免受传染病侵害。