Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Evol Anthropol. 2020 Sep;29(5):237-244. doi: 10.1002/evan.21864. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
A sizeable dataset comprising millions of lithic artifacts sampling over two million years of early paleolithic tool technology from Africa and Eurasia is now available. The widespread presupposition of an exclusively cultural, that is, socially learned, nature of early stone tools from at least Acheulean times onwards has been challenged by researchers who hypothesize that these tools, a crucial element of early hominin survival strategies, may partly have been under genetic control, next to the effects of various other determinants. The discussion this hypothesis has sparked off in the present journal is here explored somewhat further, focusing on the Baldwin effect.
现在,有一个包含数百万石器工具的大型数据集,这些工具跨越了非洲和欧亚大陆的两百万年早期旧石器时代技术。从阿舍利时代起,研究人员就一直质疑一个广泛的假设,即这些工具(早期人类生存策略的关键要素)完全是文化的,也就是社会习得的,而不是遗传的。除了各种其他决定因素的影响外,这种工具可能部分受到遗传控制。本文在探讨这一假设时,还进一步探讨了鲍德温效应。