Yi Joseph, Lee Wondong
Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea.
University of California, Irvine, CA USA.
Society. 2020;57(4):446-451. doi: 10.1007/s12115-020-00509-z. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
As in much of the world, the Coronovirus pandemic has dominated South Korean politics in 2020. Compared to other countries, Seoul's approach has been highly nationalist and politicized, as the ruling party lauded its pandemic response as the global standard and linked it to a larger, leftist-nationalist agenda. This "pandemic-leftist" discourse peaked around the April 15 midterm elections, but subsided the following month, as domestic and foreign setbacks arose. To explain, firstly, a competitive-nationalist race to flatten the infection curve encouraged the government to infringe on the civil liberties of infected patients, and society to stigmatize them. Other countries contained Covid-19 without such rights violations and stigma. Secondly, critics distinguished between the government's relative success in pandemic response and its general failures in economic and foreign policies. Instead of asking other countries to learn from one's country, each country would do well to learn from the experiences of others and to continually improve its own policies.
与世界上许多地方一样,2020年新冠疫情主导了韩国政治。与其他国家相比,首尔的应对方式高度民族主义且政治化,执政党将其疫情应对举措赞誉为全球标准,并将其与更广泛的左翼民族主义议程联系起来。这种“疫情-左翼”话语在4月15日中期选举前后达到顶峰,但在次月随着国内外挫折的出现而消退。首先,为了在降低感染曲线方面进行竞争性的民族主义竞赛,政府侵犯了感染患者的公民自由,社会也对他们进行污名化。其他国家在没有此类侵犯权利和污名化行为的情况下控制住了新冠疫情。其次,批评者区分了政府在疫情应对方面的相对成功与其在经济和外交政策上的总体失败。各国不应要求其他国家向自己国家学习,而应借鉴其他国家的经验并不断改进自身政策。