• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国杭州实施新冠疫情城市封锁期间,城乡地区臭氧意外上升,农村地区二氧化硫上升:对空气质量的影响

Unexpected rise of ozone in urban and rural areas, and sulfur dioxide in rural areas during the coronavirus city lockdown in Hangzhou, China: implications for air quality.

作者信息

Wang Liqiang, Li Mengying, Yu Shaocai, Chen Xue, Li Zhen, Zhang Yibo, Jiang Linhui, Xia Yan, Li Jiali, Liu Weiping, Li Pengfei, Lichtfouse Eric, Rosenfeld Daniel, Seinfeld John H

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Environmental Remediation and Ecological Health, Ministry of Education; Research Center for Air Pollution and Health, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058 Zhejiang People's Republic of China.

Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA.

出版信息

Environ Chem Lett. 2020;18(5):1713-1723. doi: 10.1007/s10311-020-01028-3. Epub 2020 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1007/s10311-020-01028-3
PMID:32837481
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7292245/
Abstract

The outbreak of coronavirus named COVID-19, initially identified in Wuhan, China in December 2019, has spread rapidly at the global scale. Most countries have rapidly stopped almost all activities including industry, services and transportation of goods and people, thus decreasing air pollution in an unprecedented way, and providing a unique opportunity to study air pollutants. While satellite data have provided visual evidence for the global reduction in air pollution such as nitrogen dioxide (NO) worldwide, precise and quantitative information is missing at the local scale. Here we studied changes in particulate matter (PM, PM), carbon monoxide (CO), NO, sulfur dioxide (SO) and ozone (O) at 10 urban sites in Hangzhou, a city of 7.03 million inhabitants, and at 1 rural site, before city lockdown, January 1-23, during city lockdown, January 24-February 15, and during resumption, February 16-28, in 2020. Results show that city lockdown induced a sharp decrease in PM, PM, CO, and NO concentrations at both urban and rural sites. The NO decrease is explained by reduction in traffic emissions in the urban areas, and by lower regional transport in rural areas during lockdown, as expected. SO concentrations decreased from 6.3 to 5.3 μg m in the city, but increased surprisingly from 4.7 to 5.8 μg m at the rural site: this increase is attributed both to higher coal consumption for heating and emissions from traditional fireworks of the Spring Eve and Lantern Festivals during lockdown. Unexpectedly, O concentrations increased by 145% from 24.6 to 60.6 μg m in the urban area, and from 42.0 to 62.9 μg m in the rural area during the lockdown. This finding is explained by the weakening of chemical titration of O by NO due to reductions of NO fresh emissions during the non-photochemical reaction period from 20:00 PM to 9:00 AM (local time). During the lockdown, compared to the same period in 2019, the daily average concentrations in the city decreased by 42.7% for PM, 47.9% for PM, 28.6% for SO, 22.3% for CO and 58.4% for NO, which is obviously explained by the absence of city activities. Overall, we observed not only the expected reduction in some atmospheric pollutants (PM, SO, CO, NO), but also unexpected increases in SO in the rural areas and of ozone (O) in both urban and rural areas, the latter being paradoxically due to the reduction in nitrogen oxide levels. In other words, the city lockdown has improved air quality by reducing PM, PM, CO, and NO, but has also decreased air quality by augmenting O and SO.

摘要

2019年12月在中国武汉首次发现的新型冠状病毒COVID-19疫情已在全球范围内迅速蔓延。大多数国家迅速停止了几乎所有活动,包括工业、服务业以及货物和人员运输,从而以前所未有的方式减少了空气污染,为研究空气污染物提供了独特的机会。虽然卫星数据为全球范围内二氧化氮(NO)等空气污染的减少提供了直观证据,但在地方层面却缺少精确的定量信息。在此,我们研究了拥有703万人口的杭州市10个城市站点和1个农村站点在2020年城市封锁前(1月1日至23日)、城市封锁期间(1月24日至2月15日)以及恢复期间(2月16日至28日)的颗粒物(PM、PM)、一氧化碳(CO)、NO、二氧化硫(SO)和臭氧(O)的变化情况。结果表明,城市封锁导致城市和农村站点的PM、PM、CO和NO浓度急剧下降。正如预期的那样,城市地区交通排放的减少以及农村地区在封锁期间区域传输的降低解释了NO的下降。城市中SO浓度从6.3微克/立方米降至5.3微克/立方米,但农村站点却意外地从4.7微克/立方米增至5.8微克/立方米:这种增加既归因于封锁期间取暖煤炭消耗的增加,也归因于春节和元宵节期间传统烟花的排放。出乎意料的是,封锁期间城市地区O浓度从24.6微克/立方米增至60.6微克/立方米,增幅达145%,农村地区从42.0微克/立方米增至62.9微克/立方米。这一发现可以解释为,在当地时间下午20:00至上午9:00的非光化学反应期间,由于NO新鲜排放的减少,O被NO进行化学滴定的作用减弱。与2019年同期相比,封锁期间城市中PM的日均浓度下降了42.7%,PM下降了47.9%,SO下降了28.6%,CO下降了22.3%,NO下降了58.4%,这显然是由于城市活动的停止所致。总体而言,我们不仅观察到了一些大气污染物(PM、SO、CO、NO)预期的减少,还观察到农村地区SO以及城市和农村地区臭氧(O)意外的增加,后者反常地归因于氮氧化物水平的降低。换句话说,城市封锁通过减少PM、PM、CO和NO改善了空气质量,但也通过增加O和SO降低了空气质量。

相似文献

1
Unexpected rise of ozone in urban and rural areas, and sulfur dioxide in rural areas during the coronavirus city lockdown in Hangzhou, China: implications for air quality.中国杭州实施新冠疫情城市封锁期间,城乡地区臭氧意外上升,农村地区二氧化硫上升:对空气质量的影响
Environ Chem Lett. 2020;18(5):1713-1723. doi: 10.1007/s10311-020-01028-3. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
2
A global observational analysis to understand changes in air quality during exceptionally low anthropogenic emission conditions.一项旨在了解人为排放异常低的情况下空气质量变化的全球观测分析。
Environ Int. 2021 Dec;157:106818. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106818. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
3
Effects of short-term exposure to air pollution on hospital admissions of young children for acute lower respiratory infections in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.越南胡志明市短期暴露于空气污染对幼儿急性下呼吸道感染住院率的影响。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012 Jun(169):5-72; discussion 73-83.
4
[Impacts of Emission and Meteorological Conditions on Air Pollutants at Various Sites Around the COVID-19 Lockdown in Wuhan].[排放与气象条件对武汉新冠疫情封控期间各站点空气污染物的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023 Feb 8;44(2):670-679. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202203269.
5
The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.拥堵收费计划对伦敦空气质量的影响。第1部分。排放建模与空气污染测量分析。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2011 Apr(155):5-71.
6
The London low emission zone baseline study.伦敦低排放区基线研究。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2011 Nov(163):3-79.
7
[Response of Air Quality to COVID-19 Lockdown in Xiamen Bay].[厦门湾空气质量对新冠疫情封锁措施的响应]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2021 Oct 8;42(10):4650-4659. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202103009.
8
Amplified ozone pollution in cities during the COVID-19 lockdown.城市中 COVID-19 封锁期间臭氧污染加剧。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Sep 15;735:139542. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139542. Epub 2020 May 20.
9
The effectiveness of traffic and production restrictions on urban air quality: A rare opportunity for investigation.交通和生产限制对城市空气质量的影响:一个难得的调查机会。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2023 Mar;73(3):225-239. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2022.2115161. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
10
Characteristics and sources of atmospheric pollutants in typical inland cities in arid regions of central Asia: A case study of Urumqi city.中亚干旱地区典型内陆城市大气污染物特征及来源分析——以乌鲁木齐市为例。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 20;16(4):e0249563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249563. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Ambient air quality of a less industrialized region of India (Kerala) during the COVID-19 lockdown.新冠疫情封锁期间印度一个工业化程度较低地区(喀拉拉邦)的环境空气质量。
Anthropocene. 2020 Dec;32:100270. doi: 10.1016/j.ancene.2020.100270. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
2
Response of surface ozone concentration to emission reduction and meteorology during the COVID-19 lockdown in Europe.欧洲新冠疫情封锁期间地表臭氧浓度对减排及气象条件的响应
Meteorol Appl. 2021 May-Jun;28(3):e1990. doi: 10.1002/met.1990. Epub 2021 May 7.
3
Ground ozone rise during the 2022 Shanghai lockdown caused by the unfavorable emission reduction ratio of nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds.

本文引用的文献

1
Environmental chemistry is most relevant to study coronavirus pandemics.环境化学对于研究冠状病毒大流行最为相关。
Environ Chem Lett. 2020;18(4):993-996. doi: 10.1007/s10311-020-01017-6. Epub 2020 May 20.
2
An investigation of transmission control measures during the first 50 days of the COVID-19 epidemic in China.中国 COVID-19 疫情前 50 天的传播控制措施调查。
Science. 2020 May 8;368(6491):638-642. doi: 10.1126/science.abb6105. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
3
Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.《中国 2019 年冠状病毒病临床特征》
2022年上海封控期间地面臭氧浓度上升是由氮氧化物和挥发性有机化合物减排比例不理想所致。
Atmos Environ (1994). 2025 Jan 1;340. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120851.
4
Impacts of condensable particulate matter on atmospheric organic aerosols and fine particulate matter (PM) in China.中国可凝颗粒物对大气有机气溶胶和细颗粒物(PM)的影响。
Atmos Chem Phys. 2022 Sep 13;22(17):11845-11866. doi: 10.5194/acp-22-11845-2022.
5
Crop residue burning increased during the COVID-19 lockdown: A case study of rural India.在新冠疫情封锁期间,印度农村地区农作物秸秆焚烧现象有所增加:一项案例研究
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 9;10(6):e27910. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27910. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
6
Environmentally persistent free radicals in PM from a typical Chinese industrial city during COVID-19 lockdown: The unexpected contamination level variation.疫情封锁期间典型中国工业城市 PM 中持久性自由基:意外的污染水平变化。
J Environ Sci (China). 2024 Jan;135:424-432. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2022.08.024. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
7
How does COVID-19 lockdown affect air quality: Evidence from Lanzhou, a large city in Northwest China.新冠疫情封锁措施如何影响空气质量:来自中国西北大城市兰州的证据
Urban Clim. 2023 May;49:101533. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101533. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
8
Changes in air pollution due to COVID-19 lockdowns in 2020: Limited effect on NO, PM, and PM annual means compared to the new WHO Air Quality Guidelines.2020 年因 COVID-19 封锁而导致的空气污染变化:与新的世卫组织空气质量指南相比,对 NO、PM 和 PM 年平均值的影响有限。
J Glob Health. 2022 Nov 21;12:05043. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.05043.
9
The Long-Term Impact of COVID-19 Lockdowns in Istanbul.伊斯坦布尔新冠封锁的长期影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 31;19(21):14235. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114235.
10
COVID-19 and energy: Influence mechanisms and research methodologies.新冠病毒与能源:影响机制及研究方法
Sustain Prod Consum. 2021 Jul;27:2134-2152. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 May 19.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
4
Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.中国武汉地区 2019 年新型冠状病毒感染患者的临床特征。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
5
Drivers of improved PM air quality in China from 2013 to 2017.2013 年至 2017 年中国改善 PM 空气质量的驱动因素。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 3;116(49):24463-24469. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907956116. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
6
Relationships between Particulate Matter, Ozone, and Nitrogen Oxides during Urban Smoke Events in the Western US.美国西部城市烟雾事件中颗粒物、臭氧和氮氧化物之间的关系。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Nov 5;53(21):12519-12528. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05241. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
7
Aerosol-driven droplet concentrations dominate coverage and water of oceanic low-level clouds.气溶胶驱动的液滴浓度主导着海洋低空云的覆盖范围和含水量。
Science. 2019 Feb 8;363(6427). doi: 10.1126/science.aav0566. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
8
High reduction of ozone and particulate matter during the 2016 G-20 summit in Hangzhou by forced emission controls of industry and traffic.通过对工业和交通实施强制排放控制,2016年杭州二十国集团峰会期间臭氧和颗粒物大幅减少。
Environ Chem Lett. 2017 Dec;15(4):709-715. doi: 10.1007/s10311-017-0642-2.
9
Characteristics and emission-reduction measures evaluation of PM during the two major events: APEC and Parade.两大事件期间 PM 的特征和减排措施评估:APEC 和阅兵。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Oct 1;595:81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.231. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
10
A paradox for air pollution controlling in China revealed by "APEC Blue" and "Parade Blue".由“APEC蓝”和“阅兵蓝”揭示的中国空气污染控制中的一个悖论。
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 29;6:34408. doi: 10.1038/srep34408.