Iravani Maryam, Shamszadeh Sayna, Panahandeh Narges, Sheikh-Al-Eslamian Seyedeh Mahsa, Torabzadeh Hassan
Department of Restorative, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran, Iran.
Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Restor Dent Endod. 2020 Jul 16;45(3):e41. doi: 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e41. eCollection 2020 Aug.
This study aimed to evaluate the ability of lithium disilicate ceramics to reproduce the A2 shade and to mask A4 substrates.
Twenty-four discs (8 mm in diameter, shade A2) of high translucency (groups 1-3) and low translucency (groups 4-6) of IPS e.max ceramic with different thicknesses (0.5, 0.75, and 1 mm) were fabricated as monolithic structures. In addition, discs of medium opacity (group 7-8) with different core/veneer combinations (0.3 mm/0.7 mm and 0.5 mm/0.5 mm) were fabricated as bilayer structures. Specimens were superimposed on an A4 substrate (complex). The color changes of the complex were measured using a spectrophotometer on a black background, and the ΔE values of the complex were compared with either the A4 substrate or the A2 shade tab. One-way analysis of variance, the Tukey honest significant difference test, and the Fisher test were used to analyze the data ( < 0.05).
Significant between-group differences were found for comparisons to both the A4 substrate and the A2 shade ( < 0.05). When compared with the A4 substrate, the ΔE values in all groups were in the non-acceptable range. When compared with the A2 shade, the ΔE values in all groups, except groups 2 and 3, were in the clinically acceptable range.
All translucencies and thicknesses masked the underlying dark substrate. However, the low-translucency IPS e.max Press better reproduced the A2 shade.
本研究旨在评估二硅酸锂陶瓷再现A2色以及遮盖A4基底的能力。
制作了24个直径8mm、色号为A2的IPS e.max陶瓷圆盘,分为高透明度(1 - 3组)和低透明度(4 - 6组),厚度分别为0.5mm、0.75mm和1mm,作为整体结构。此外,制作了中等不透明度的圆盘(7 - 8组),采用不同的核/饰面组合(0.3mm/0.7mm和0.5mm/0.5mm)作为双层结构。将试样叠加在A4基底(复合体)上。在黑色背景下使用分光光度计测量复合体的颜色变化,并将复合体的ΔE值与A4基底或A2色板进行比较。采用单因素方差分析、Tukey诚实显著差异检验和Fisher检验对数据进行分析(<0.05)。
与A4基底和A2色相比,组间差异均有统计学意义(<0.05)。与A4基底相比,所有组的ΔE值均在不可接受范围内。与A2色相比,除2组和3组外,所有组的ΔE值均在临床可接受范围内。
所有透明度和厚度的材料均能遮盖下层深色基底。然而,低透明度的IPS e.max Press能更好地再现A2色。