Magura S, Casriel C, Goldsmith D S, Strug D L, Lipton D S
Narcotic and Drug Research, Inc., New York, NY 10027.
Addict Behav. 1988;13(1):113-8. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(88)90035-4.
The study assessed the effects of contingency contracting for medication take-home privileges on the polydrug use of methadone patients. Comparisons were made among 20 patients using cocaine, 13 using other illicit drugs, and seven exhibiting other noncompliant behavior. A within-subjects reversal design showed that there was no overall difference in the percentage of positive urines between the pre-contingency and contingency periods, nor between the pre- and post-contingency periods. During the first contingency month, however, one group of patients eliminated drug use, while the remaining had an increased percentage of positive urines. This increase may have been due to the heightened urinalysis regimen during the contingency period rather than to more actual drug use. During the first month, drug-related contracts not involving cocaine were more successful than those targeting cocaine, and non-drug-related contracts were more successful than drug-related ones. The study concluded that contracting had a favorable, though transient, effect primarily on non-cocaine-abusing methadone patients. Further research using stronger or multiple reinforcers is indicated.
该研究评估了针对美沙酮患者带回家服药特权的应急契约对其多种药物使用情况的影响。对20名使用可卡因的患者、13名使用其他非法药物的患者以及7名表现出其他不依从行为的患者进行了比较。一项受试者内反转设计表明,在应急前和应急期间,以及应急前和应急后期间,阳性尿液百分比没有总体差异。然而,在第一个应急月期间,一组患者停止了药物使用,而其余患者的阳性尿液百分比有所增加。这种增加可能是由于应急期间尿液分析方案的加强,而非实际药物使用的增加。在第一个月,不涉及可卡因的与药物相关的契约比针对可卡因的契约更成功,与非药物相关的契约比与药物相关的契约更成功。该研究得出结论,契约主要对不滥用可卡因的美沙酮患者有积极但短暂的影响。表明需要使用更强或多种强化物进行进一步研究。